• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is representative democracy?

Extracts from this document...


1} What is representative democracy? A representative democracy is when more than one body acts in the people's interest during an election period. A representative stands for another person, group or entity. An elected politician represents their electors, district and parties. Also in a representative democracy, representatives sometimes hold the power to elect others such as the government in the UK, the prime minister and the president in other countries. 2} Outline the working of any 3 electoral systems used in the UK. The main electoral system used in the UK is FPTP which is used for the general elections. In the British electoral systems is properly titled as the single majority in single majorities. FPTP contains features such as each constituency returns one Member of Parliament. Each party may only nominate one candidate in each constituency. Voters have only one vote each. They choose the preferred candidate by means of the proverbial cross on the ballot paper. Whichever candidate wins the largest number of votes is declared elected. This is known as gaining a simple majority or plurality. It is not necessary for a candidate to achieve over 50 percent of the votes. Whichever candidate wins the largest number of votes is declared elected. This is known as gaining a simple majority or plurality. It is not necessary for a candidate to achieve over 50 percent of the votes. ...read more.


FPTP works in the way which who ever has the most votes in that specific constituency would be elected. It is not a majority vote system. The last time we ever saw a Majority vote was over 50 years ago. Even though no parties are able to get a majority vote I still think FPTP shall still be kept because we have been using the same electoral system for decades and it has worked fine. Compared to alternative electoral systems like AV; AV may require you to get a 50% vote but it doesn't concentrate on who the people want to represent them in their constituencies so I don't think it would be a healthy electoral systems. This may cause MP's to quit because they might not be able to get the backing/support they need from the citizens in the constituencies. I like the simplicity of FPTP with one candidate winning and being clearly identifiable as my MP, also constituencies to be equal of numerical size as far as practical. It's simple to understand and thus doesn't cost much to administer and doesn't alienate people who can't count. It doesn't take very long to count all the votes and work out who's won, meaning results can be declared a handful of hours after polls close. The voter can clearly express a view on which party they think should form the next government. ...read more.


Small constituencies also lead to a proliferation of safe seats, where the same party is all but guaranteed re-election at each election. This not only in effect disenfranchises a region's voters, but it leads to these areas being ignored when it comes to framing policy. If large areas of the country are electoral deserts for a particular party, not only is the area ignored by that party, but also ambitious politicians from the area have to move away from their homeland if they want to have influence within their party. FPTP rewards organised minorities, deals ineffectively with the most disliked parties, ignores (and thus fails to deal with) views that don't look like challenging at the polls and can make certain areas feel neglected by the big political parties. It is therefore the only electoral system in use in the UK to have elected representatives from extremist parties. A party can be despised by 49 per cent of an electorate and still win. Encouraging two-party politics can be an advantage, but in a multi-party culture, third parties with significant support can be greatly disadvantaged. In the 1983 general election, the Liberal SDP alliance won 25 of the vote, but gained only 3 per cent of the seats. Because FPTP restricts a constituency's choice of candidates, representation of minorities and women suffers from 'most broadly acceptable candidate syndrome', where the 'safest' looking candidate is the most likely to be offered a chance to stand for election ?? ?? ?? ?? Government & Politics Met´┐Ż Serdar Coban Assignment two 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Government & Politics Revision Notes

    Critics argue that two classes of representation are created, those who have to fight for re-election in their constituency and those whose re-election is ensured if they remain at the top of the party list. The List system This system involves multi-member constituencies.

  2. Electoral Systems.

    Research by Democratic Audit in 1997 showed that the results could actually be even more distorting than under First-Past-The-Post. * It also does very little to give a voice to those who have been traditionally under-represented in parliament. * There is no transfer of powers from party authority to the voters, and it does not produce a proportional parliament.

  1. Electoral Systems Assignment

    As I have alluded to previously, the introduction of a PR electoral system would typically raise the number of ethnic minority groups and women into government, as well as increasing the number of smaller party member within government. To many people, this is a very positive factor; it promotes the

  2. 'Britain is in desperate need of electoral reform. The FPTP system is undemocratic.' Discuss.

    whose support is spread thinly over a large area to gain a significant number of seats, for example the SDP, allied with the Liberal Democrats, won a quarter of the votes in 1983 and only 23 seats in Parliament. They were only 2.2% behind Labour and yet 186 seats behind them in The House of Commons.

  1. What is the main reason for the loss of faith and interest in our ...

    in general have lost faith in our political system because of the scandalous behaviour of the politicians. I've decided to use the pie chart technique again to display this data because I think it clearly shows the difference between the answers.

  2. Apart from referendums, explain three ways in which democracy in the UK could be ...

    Parties are then given extra MP?s to ?top up? their party in parliament until their number of seats is equal to the number of votes they received. The advantages of this system are that it maintains the MP ? constituency link and it is also proportional while doing this.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work