What options face the Commission on what to recommend about conventions, and which course of action would be preferable?
Public Law I Essay A
A (hypothetical) Constitutional Commission is considering how (if at all) constitutional conventions might be incorporated into the draft of a new constitution of the United Kingdom. What options face the Commission on what to recommend about conventions, and which course of action would be preferable?
In order to accurately assess the incorporation of Constitutional conventions into the draft of a new Constitution of the United Kingdom, one must firstly look at the definition and nature of constitutional conventions. A succinct definition is that a convention is a constitutional practice or way of behaving which is considered to be binding on those to whom it applies. An example of this is that the Queen can appoint anyone to be Prime Minister; by convention she appoints the leader of the majority party of the House of Commons. Constitutional conventions are considered to be an important part of the British Constitution but could possibly pose a problem if they are broken due to their ambiguous nature.