• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What problems faced the framers of the Constitution in 1787?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What problems faced the framers of the Constitution in 1787? The American constitution of 1787 was drawn up to replace the gap left behind following the end of British rule and allow the declaration of independence to be translated into a workable government. It sought to replace the articles of the confederation and perpetual union by creating a greater separation of powers and expressing the principles of democracy. The constitution attempted to balance the need for greater federal control and unity amongst the states whilst protecting individual state liberty and ensuring that no group would gain ascendancy. It provided the framework for a government strong enough to protect commerce and weak enough to prevent it from abusing its powers. However the problems that faced the framers of the constitution meant that the constitution would not be complete and further amendments would be needed. The framers of the constitution faced a wide variety of problems in 1787 mainly concentrated on the diversity between the states. Historically, the American culture was split following years of settlement from the British the French and the Spanish. ...read more.

Middle

However the framers also had to provide a government that was superior to the states. There was economic diversity between the states, from plantations in the south to the merchants in New England. The framers needed to protect the industries but also provide a united front to Europe. Slavery also split the states, and a civil war could have occurred earlier if the framers did not address the issue. There were also many radical state legislatures, which the framers needed to deal with, notably Rhode Island. The framers also had to deal with how to make the new government representative equally between the states. The diversity between the states meant that there was very little consensus and that framing a constitution around them would create a compromise. The framers had to provide the constitution to meet all these problems. One way it did this was by a separation of powers. The principle of separation of powers, the executive, the legislative and the judiciary, ensured that a system of checks and balances was enabled to protect the rights of the states and of the constitution whilst providing a government strong enough to guard against 'excessive democracy.' ...read more.

Conclusion

This appeased the south sufficiently to prevent them from rejecting the constitution, but the problem was still there. The constitution was able to gain popular support through providing elections and later by a Bill of Rights. The Marbury versus Madison case showed that the Supreme Court would uphold the constitution. The constitution gave those powers that were not enumerated, in the necessary and proper clause, to the states and thus appeased those people who wanted to protect their state rights and liberties. The Presidency had a four-year term and elected indirectly through an electoral college. If an amendment was needed for the constitution then it needed two-thirds approval in the Congress and three-fourths adoption by the states. Article six in the constitution made sure that national law was the supreme law of the land and could not be overruled by state law. There are a number of limits placed on the government. The habeas corpus act protected citizen's liberties. By applying the principles of federalism and a separation of powers, the framers of the constitution were able to create a balance of the problem facing them and the need for a united economic country. 1 Jack Gabb Page ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. To what extent has the Constitution protected civil liberties in America?

    The Supreme Court ruled that it was constitutional and in 1945 only paid for the train fair home. Eventually the court case Korematsu V's USA disagreed and in 1988, $1.6 billion pounds was given out as compensation. This shows that even the USA were willing to admit that what happened

  2. The 1820 Missouri Compromise.

    Southern representatives, however, saw it as an encroachment upon the sovereignty of individual states. There would no longer be a status quo on the matter of slavery. Slavery was allowed in Missouri, but abolitionists succeeded in drawing a line of demarcation were slavery would not be allowed, which was latitude thirty-six degrees, thirty minutes.

  1. Has the US Constituion Protected Individual Liberties?

    The Georgia Supreme Court explained that the Eighth Amendment was intended to prohibit barbarous punishments such as castration, burning at the stake, and quartering, and any other punishments that caused a lingering death. The Court also invalidated an Oklahoma law that compelled the state government to sterilize "feeble-minded" or "habitual"

  2. Doctrine of the separation of powers.

    Sovereign is the head of the executive but her role is more ceremonial. However contrary to the USA doctrine of separations ministers are by convention members of the legislature. While this is a breach of the doctrine it can rationalised by saying that it promotes the responsibility of ministers by

  1. The British Constitution

    The last time a Monarch became involved in political issues he was executed. King Charles ? believed in the divine right of kings, he was a deeply religious man favouring the High Anglican form of worship. He also spent a lot of the crowns money on works of art and painting collections.

  2. The paradox of power in the United States constitution.

    The Anti-Federalists foresaw that the impossibility of giving power to both the federal government and states as the Constitution had would inevitably lead to some sort of failure - the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions, the case of McCulloch v. Maryland, and the Webster-Hayne debate are only a few examples of

  1. How is Britain's constitution changing in the 21st century?

    Similarly I am not looking at the Northern Ireland Assembly, as its contemporary position is unresolved and would be too monopolising. Europe The European Union has predominant influence over Britain since the Single European Act 1973, when Westminster relinquished a part of its sovereignty.

  2. American Government Term Paper #1. Discuss the theory of Checks and Balances as outlined ...

    âThe Framers wanted to be certain that the government they created did not pose even more of a threat to its citizensâ liberties and property rights than did the radical state legislatures they feared and despisedâ (We the People). The legislative branch was designed to be the most powerful.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work