• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What problems faced the framers of the Constitution in 1787?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What problems faced the framers of the Constitution in 1787? The American constitution of 1787 was drawn up to replace the gap left behind following the end of British rule and allow the declaration of independence to be translated into a workable government. It sought to replace the articles of the confederation and perpetual union by creating a greater separation of powers and expressing the principles of democracy. The constitution attempted to balance the need for greater federal control and unity amongst the states whilst protecting individual state liberty and ensuring that no group would gain ascendancy. It provided the framework for a government strong enough to protect commerce and weak enough to prevent it from abusing its powers. However the problems that faced the framers of the constitution meant that the constitution would not be complete and further amendments would be needed. The framers of the constitution faced a wide variety of problems in 1787 mainly concentrated on the diversity between the states. Historically, the American culture was split following years of settlement from the British the French and the Spanish. ...read more.

Middle

However the framers also had to provide a government that was superior to the states. There was economic diversity between the states, from plantations in the south to the merchants in New England. The framers needed to protect the industries but also provide a united front to Europe. Slavery also split the states, and a civil war could have occurred earlier if the framers did not address the issue. There were also many radical state legislatures, which the framers needed to deal with, notably Rhode Island. The framers also had to deal with how to make the new government representative equally between the states. The diversity between the states meant that there was very little consensus and that framing a constitution around them would create a compromise. The framers had to provide the constitution to meet all these problems. One way it did this was by a separation of powers. The principle of separation of powers, the executive, the legislative and the judiciary, ensured that a system of checks and balances was enabled to protect the rights of the states and of the constitution whilst providing a government strong enough to guard against 'excessive democracy.' ...read more.

Conclusion

This appeased the south sufficiently to prevent them from rejecting the constitution, but the problem was still there. The constitution was able to gain popular support through providing elections and later by a Bill of Rights. The Marbury versus Madison case showed that the Supreme Court would uphold the constitution. The constitution gave those powers that were not enumerated, in the necessary and proper clause, to the states and thus appeased those people who wanted to protect their state rights and liberties. The Presidency had a four-year term and elected indirectly through an electoral college. If an amendment was needed for the constitution then it needed two-thirds approval in the Congress and three-fourths adoption by the states. Article six in the constitution made sure that national law was the supreme law of the land and could not be overruled by state law. There are a number of limits placed on the government. The habeas corpus act protected citizen's liberties. By applying the principles of federalism and a separation of powers, the framers of the constitution were able to create a balance of the problem facing them and the need for a united economic country. 1 Jack Gabb Page ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. How is Britain's constitution changing in the 21st century?

    If Britain does become part of a federal Europe, no longer will it be part of a unitary system. Similarly the constitution will be codified in one document. Covering such a mass of nation states undoubtedly a European constitution would be quite rigid, with no nation state having supremacy over the others.

  2. To what extent has the Constitution protected civil liberties in America?

    It was said that "any or all persons maybe excluded" and were locked up without trial and the government temporarily removed their rights in states such as California and Oregon. This was a violation of amendment 5 as there was no "due process cause".

  1. The 1820 Missouri Compromise.

    Southern representatives, however, saw it as an encroachment upon the sovereignty of individual states. There would no longer be a status quo on the matter of slavery. Slavery was allowed in Missouri, but abolitionists succeeded in drawing a line of demarcation were slavery would not be allowed, which was latitude thirty-six degrees, thirty minutes.

  2. Has the US Constituion Protected Individual Liberties?

    The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that criminal sentences that are inhuman, outrageous, or shocking to the social conscience are cruel and unusual. Although the Court has never provided meaningful definitions for these characteristics, it is clear that they have been applied in some cases.

  1. The British Constitution

    Steadily day-to-day power came to be exercised by ministers in cabinet. 'Queen in Parliament' is the formal title of the British Legislature, Which consists of The Sovereign, the House of Lords and the House of Commons. It is a Bicameral legislature, consisting of the two chambers the House of Lords and the House of Commons.

  2. Doctrine of the separation of powers.

    Sovereign is the head of the executive but her role is more ceremonial. However contrary to the USA doctrine of separations ministers are by convention members of the legislature. While this is a breach of the doctrine it can rationalised by saying that it promotes the responsibility of ministers by

  1. The Religious Right

    The group has also, in a joint effort with 13 other groups, the CWA released an advertisement stating "The DOJ and FBI should immediately investigate whether 'adult' videos being sold in hotels by OnCommand and LodgeNet violate long-established Federal and State laws regarding distribution of obscene material.

  2. American Government Term Paper #1. Discuss the theory of Checks and Balances as outlined ...

    The Framers idea when creating the checks and balances system was to keep a balance between the different branches of government, or separationâ (We the People). They did not want the president to have too much control, so the legislative branch looks over the executive branch and also has some say in the actions of the executive branch.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work