• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

When The Arguments For and Against Have Been Taken Into Account, It Is Clear That Incresingly, Pluralistic Society Pressure Groups are A Supplement To Democracy. How True Is This?

Extracts from this document...


When The Arguments For and Against Have Been Taken Into Account, It Is Clear That Incresingly, Pluralistic Society Pressure Groups are A Supplement To Democracy. How True Is This? This essay will consider the main arguments both for and against pressure groups being a supplement to democracy and assess the extent to which they do serve as a supplement to democracy in today's increasing pluralistic society. The government has always had to deal with groups in society but over the last two centuries pressure groups have become an indispensable feature of the British political system, as these groupings have more effectively organized themselves in response to society's increasing complexity and the increasing government intervention in more areas of life. E.g. the committee for effecting the Abolition of the Slave Trade was formed in 1787. Society has also generally become more pluralistic and more aware of rights, which altogether, has served as a stimulus for the increasing relative importance of pressure groups. Far more citizens of the UK are now members of pressure groups than political parties. Broadly speaking, a pressure group may be defined as an organisation that seeks to influence, counteract or reverse government policy, without itself seeking to govern. "Pressure groups exist as conduits of political activity and serve the function of organizing and transmitting political pressure from the pluralistic mass of society into the process of central government." ...read more.


Governments can't effectively deal with all issues. Due to the increasing complexity and growth of government areas, it is just short of impossible to expect the government to have expertise in all the areas they work in. Pressure groups supplement democracy through relations with political parties in that they provide a source of specialist knowledge/advise to the government as pressure groups are usually concerned with a single issue or a narrow policy area so have the ability to develop expert knowledge of that issue/area. The argument for the existence of a democratic deficit is also due to the fact that currently, the elected representatives may not support the views of minorities. Pressure groups fill this void as they ensure that decision makers hear a group's view - that is pressure groups strive to defend the interests of minorities, particularly those connected with parties not in government. This is a particularly important function of pressure groups as a supplement to democracy because it is the view of the majority, which has a tendency to prevail. This so called 'tyranny of the majority' means that without a system including pressure groups as a supplement to democracy, it would be difficult for the rights of the minority to be protected. Pressure groups aid the dispersal of power away from the centralized legislative and executive institutions towards the people who are actually affected by the decisions. ...read more.


I believe that pressure groups are a permanent, vital part of the political process and partially contribute to overcoming the immense democratic deficit. Despite the fact that some pressure groups are labelled largely oligarchic in practice, in most organisations, I believe that this is a natural outcome of the increasing size and complexity. E.g. I deem it extremely impractical - if not virtually impossible for the elected officials of a professional body such as the Law Society to effectively speak or act on behalf of all of its thousands and thousands of members as there are bound to be conflicting opinions of the members of an organization of such a large scale. Also with respect to the argument that pressure groups limit parliamentary activities I do agree that it contributes, but hasten re-state that parliamentary sovereignty the UK has been suffering constant erosions, from the impact of the EU to the huge parliamentary majorities being gained (effectively allowing the government to ignore even sizeable rebellions in parliament) meaning that in reality parliaments role as the supreme legislative body has and will continue to diminish with or without the existence of pressure groups. In accordance with the arguments put across earlier in this essay, I think that pressure groups are an indispensable supplement to democracy as although there are arguments to the contrary, there are more and weightier arguments for. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Pressure Groups section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Pressure Groups essays

  1. Pressure groups revision - short questions and answers.

    already been moved out from the "corridors of power" and onto the street * Their demands and wishes have already been ignored/heard * Nowadays, many view political protests as a waste of time, pointless and a waste of tax payer's money in order to police them. * Civil disobedience, e.g.

  2. Assess the contribution of interest groups to democratic government

    government regarding matters to do with the health sector listens to the British Medical Association. Furthermore, in America, many people see Congressmen to be working for these interest groups anyway and therefore supporting these interest groups is the best way influence government.

  1. Revision notes on pressure groups

    E.g. Shami Chakrabati, Liberty * Popular support - the more people, greater the political influence generally. However, Stop The War campaign marches in 2003 failed. Governments measure by how much electoral damage caused by NOT acceding to demands * Effectiveness of opposition - groups invariably clash with others, e.g.

  2. The existence of pressure group makes government more democratic; the activities of pressure groups ...

    Groups attain insider status because they posses expertise that cannot be readily obtained elsewhere; and they have to represent an important faction of society. Groups such as the British Medical Association and the Confederation of British Industry have all been granted insider status as they have on many occasions provided essential information and have a reliable track record.

  1. The wealthier and the closer the pressure group is to the government, the more ...

    It is highly likely, that outsider groups will require the most assistance from the media, regardless of their wealth. Outsider groups such as the SSCS will rely heavily upon the media. This is due to the limitations of their influence on the government and for that reason, they must seek

  2. 'The existence of pressure groups makes government more democratic; the activities of pressure groups ...

    High turnouts regarding voters during elections are seen as consequences of effective government. In effect this is achieved in part due to the existence of pressure groups. The existence of some pressure groups has a negative effect on government, in turn making it seem far less democratic.

  1. Discuss why pressure groups are sometimes criticised.

    Moreover these methods are not always very effective. The student riots did nothing to reduce the impact of tuition fees being introduced. For many, the main reason that they criticise pressure groups for using things such as direct action is that it wastes police time a resources, time and resources

  2. How has Pressure Groups contributed to Democracy?

    A good example of how pressure groups have influenced law reform is that of fox hunting. The Political Animal Lobby, amongst other groups strove to change the law on fox hunting. At the same time the Countryside Alliance opposed the law change on fox hunting and fought to keep fox hunting legal.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work