• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Where Power Lies in Congress

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

WHERE POWER LIES IN CONGRESS SAMUEL COVE Each chamber of Congress has a different focus of power. The reasons for this are partly because of the Constitution. With the Senate, it gives the power to ratify or reject treaties (such as the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty) and confirm executive (often ambassadorial) appointments. Further, Senators are appointed per state rather than per district, this contributes to giving them a more national (and international) outlook, rather than for the 'folks back home'. These factors increase the Senate's influence over foreign affairs. Although it could be argued that this 'power' in the Senate is only in theory. With Presidential Executive Agreements used in place of treaties more often, and EXOP officials having much power, thus reducing the importance of executive confirmations. These factors undermine the Senate's power. The Senate also has the power to confirm (e.g. Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Samuel Alito) or reject (e.g. Harriet Myers, forced to withdraw after conservative pressure) Supreme Court appointments; a potentially long-reaching power that far outstrips the individual term of any congressmen (6 and 2 years for the Senate and House respectively) - although it should be noted that the high rate of incumbency makes this effect slightly lessened. Individual Senators are often seen as having a higher prestige than members of the House - perhaps because of each of the ...read more.

Middle

Also, the House Rules Committee, the most powerful committee in the House (because it can scrap any piece of legislation regardless of its relevant area, and also because it timetables the House floor) was dominated by Gingrich whom alone had 5 votes on the committee and thus, with his other Republican members, he effectively held an iron grip over it and subsequently over much of the legislative agenda. Gingrich also put limits on the chair terms and the number of committees and subcommittees a Congressman could serve on. This allowed him to remove senior members, and be more able to influence who became the new chairs. This practice was continued even after Gingrich left office, for example even popular chairs being removed due to the influence held by Majority Leader Tom Daley in 2000-1. Each of these factors has substantially shifted Congressional power from the committees to the party leadership. Since January 2007, and the Democrat-controlled 110th Congress, this balance of power has shifted some-what back to the committees. Nancy Pelosi, the House Speaker, has been much less publicised for using Task Forces, for example. However, she has continued the practice of limiting committee chair terms, so party leadership has been controlling power in that respect. It should also be noted that this leadership power is by no means constant, with it largely depending on the personality and goals of the individual. ...read more.

Conclusion

During the Republican Congress - Clinton years, little legislation was signed and Congress' approval ratings dropped sharply, subsequently. Conversely from 2001-2007 (excluding the Democrat Senate of Summer 2001-2002), the Republican Congress were highly successful at getting legislation through with their Republican President - for example the use of only one veto by the president, in comparison to the 7-8 vetoes used after the Democrats gained control, in only one year of 2007-2008. But whether or not this is Congressional power or not is subjective. The 2001-2007 Republican Congress was mocked as 'Do Nothing' and 'Bush's Lieutenants' - so perhaps this isn't an exercise of their own power, but that of the presidents - Bush was able to get through legislation that his supporters in Congress nominated, such as multiple tax cuts, NCLB and the Patriot Act - but was this their success or just that of his platform? More so his, it would seem. But either way, the Speaker getting on well with the President is an important factor in differentiating the Gingrich from the Hastert. Power in recent times has definitely shifted towards party leaders then, it would seem. And although it fluctuates, the overall trend - Gingrich, Daley and Pelosi for example - do seem to show a definitive increase in recent times, matching that of the greater partisanship. Seniority? Expertise? Why bother with that, when you can have order and control! ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. presidential power how far does it go

    The Justice Department must provide proof that the target is "agent of a foreign power". When expediency is important wiretapping may begin 72 hours before a warrant is physically obtained. During wartime, 15 days is allowed. If neither Congress nor the court is consulted, the wiretap must be withdrawn and all evidence destroyed.

  2. Assess the power and significance of congress.

    The House has a few exclusive powers that the Senate does not. The House is the only one of the two that can initiate money bills. The president himself nor EXOP can do such a thing. This offers the House of Representatives a large scope of power in financial issues abroad and domestically.

  1. "An admirable and enlightened example of international co-operation.' Does the congress System (1815-25) deserve ...

    The fatal cause was not caused by the Congress of Vienna. Some people said that, "The Congress System led to some clashes between the powers." That wasn't true. The best example was the discussion about the Greek revolutions by the powers in the Congress of Verona.

  2. Overpaid and Underworked: Plight of the Canadian Senate

    a reminder, rather than a branch of government with the power to veto. Elected By stating the effectiveness of our Senate, or lack there of, one could easily conclude that our Senators are much like overpaid and under worked figureheads.

  1. A Trend of Decentralization

    There was an explosion of subcommittees which aided the dispersion of power within Congress. "The dispersion of committees maximizes the opportunities of committee chairs to use their power to distribute benefits directly to their districts and states and to take positions on issues that will be appealing to their constituents."2

  2. Theodor Herzl's Influence on the First Zionist Congress.

    Later, during his stay in Paris as a journalist, he was brought face-to-face with the problem. At the time, he considered the Jewish problem as being just a social issue. However, his whole view on the Jews would soon change.

  1. The power of the President is limited to the power to persuade. Discuss.

    For instance, when the Republicans controlled Congress for the first part of Bush?s presidency, he used no vetoes at all. When the Democrats gained control in 2006, he issued the regular veto six times in one year. Regardless of how extensive a President?s powers of persuasion are, he is unlikely

  2. The Separation of Church and State in America.

    In the similar Washington bill there was no provision to allow religious employers the ability to deny their employees contraceptive coverage. Pro-life entities campaigned against the bill, claiming that their right to freedom of religion was being violated, when it is not.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work