• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Which changes in the franchise and electoral methods in the period 1868 and 1992 did most to make Britainmore democratic?

Extracts from this document...


Which changes in the franchise and electoral methods in the period 1868 and 1992 did most to make Britain more democratic? There are many countries that claim to democratic, and the United Kingdom is one of these. We elect our government, which is the key feature of a representative democracy; however this is not necessarily enough to make our country a democracy. Other features of a representative democracy are: - a choice of political parties, free and fair elections and civil and political rights. Britain has all of these features, but to different degrees. Since 1868 many changes have been made to the British franchise and electoral methods, which have created a more democratic country for British citizens, the most important of these changes will be explored in this essay. One very important aspect of democracy is fair elections; in Britain up until 1872 there was much patronage as votes were held in public. Gladstone was Liberal Prime Minister from 1868-1874 and he was responsible for a major series of reforms. ...read more.


In 1885 the Redistribution of Seats Act was passed, this redistributed the constituencies fairly, making the power of each vote, in theory, equal. For a election to be fair people should also have the same number of votes, as if some people have two votes this is the equivalent of having twice the voting power of other people. But in Britain, up until 1948, people who had houses or businesses in more than one seat had more than one vote; plural voting. Changing this system of plural voting and creating equal constituencies helped to make Britain more democratic because it created fairer elections, where every member of society has an equal power to elect the government. Democracy is when the majority of people in a country have the power to have some say in how the country is run and in the decisions that are made. It is also important I a democracy that the restrictions on voting are equal for everybody. ...read more.


still be viewed as being undemocratic in 1918 because the franchise was not equal for all of the population or for men and women. So when in 1928 the franchise was again modified so that almost everyone over 21 could vote, and women became equal to men in voting rights. The Acts of 1884, 1918 and 1928 were all important changes in the franchise because they were all vital steps towards British democracy. Changes in electoral methods and franchise since 1868 have helped to make Britain more democratic. Britain can now say that it's franchise is completely democratic; equal opportunities for all. However the although the electoral methods have been improved since 1868 they are still not the completely democratic, as Britain still retains the 'first-past-the-post' electoral system which means that a party can gain power without 50% of the votes. Thus said though Britain is one of the fairest and most democratic countries in the world and this is largely due to the changes mentioned in this essay. Jennie Seager 125/9/2007 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Can the use of the First Past the Post electoral system be justified in ...

    5 star(s)

    Further, as seen in the UK in 2010, the Liberal Democrats, whilst only gaining 23% compared to Labour's 29% and the Conservatives 36%, had huge power - it was essentially them who decided the government as whoever they decided to join with would hold office.

  2. How democratic was Britain by 1918

    A country is not democratic if working class were not properly represented in the House of Commons. This was changed when the property qualification for MP's was abolished in 1858.

  1. The Parliamentary Reform and Redistribution Act of 1884 - 1885.

    The 1884 Reform Act sought to enfranchise the morally worthy and industrious. Athough the size of the electorate was widened considerably, 40% of adult males were still without the vote at the time. Source-http://www.wordiq.com/definition/Representation_of_the_People_Act_1884 The Redistribution Act 1885 William Gladstone with his Liberal Government followed up the 1884 Third Reform

  2. Iran Country Study

    Ali * Jihad - holy war * Mojtahed - one who exercises ejtehad * Mullah - a low-ranking cleric trained in traditional law * Shah - king, the undisputed leader * Ulema - the collective term for religious leaders * Umma - the Islamic community Section V: Comparative Analysis Iran

  1. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    Finally, partisan attachment is based on a rational assessment of which party best represents their own interests and ideology. Proponents of the view that a stable party system is manifesting in Russia point out that four parties from the 1999 elections represent the core of a stabilizing party system (McFaul 2000b, 2000c, 2000d).

  2. Accounts for the changes in voting behaviour in the last 30 years in UK ...

    The BES (The British Election Panel) or the BESP (The British Election Study Panel) conducted surveys to determine the extent to which individual voters change their party identification over time. The areas that they paid most attention to were the political preferences and values of the electorate, along with economic perceptions and their social attitudes.

  1. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    Potential learning that would upset this balance of forces finds very rough sledding. The treatment of whistle-blowers, who sometimes go public with revelations of misguided or distorted policies or of bad methods used in their administration, is eloquent evidence of this problem.

  2. How Democratic is Britain?

    The problem with this is that most of the people who work for the state are middle and upper class and all seem to share the same views about the way society should be run. This means that not all views are being represented their views are elitism.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work