• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Which changes in the franchise and electoral methods in the period 1868 and 1992 did most to make Britainmore democratic?

Extracts from this document...


Which changes in the franchise and electoral methods in the period 1868 and 1992 did most to make Britain more democratic? There are many countries that claim to democratic, and the United Kingdom is one of these. We elect our government, which is the key feature of a representative democracy; however this is not necessarily enough to make our country a democracy. Other features of a representative democracy are: - a choice of political parties, free and fair elections and civil and political rights. Britain has all of these features, but to different degrees. Since 1868 many changes have been made to the British franchise and electoral methods, which have created a more democratic country for British citizens, the most important of these changes will be explored in this essay. One very important aspect of democracy is fair elections; in Britain up until 1872 there was much patronage as votes were held in public. Gladstone was Liberal Prime Minister from 1868-1874 and he was responsible for a major series of reforms. ...read more.


In 1885 the Redistribution of Seats Act was passed, this redistributed the constituencies fairly, making the power of each vote, in theory, equal. For a election to be fair people should also have the same number of votes, as if some people have two votes this is the equivalent of having twice the voting power of other people. But in Britain, up until 1948, people who had houses or businesses in more than one seat had more than one vote; plural voting. Changing this system of plural voting and creating equal constituencies helped to make Britain more democratic because it created fairer elections, where every member of society has an equal power to elect the government. Democracy is when the majority of people in a country have the power to have some say in how the country is run and in the decisions that are made. It is also important I a democracy that the restrictions on voting are equal for everybody. ...read more.


still be viewed as being undemocratic in 1918 because the franchise was not equal for all of the population or for men and women. So when in 1928 the franchise was again modified so that almost everyone over 21 could vote, and women became equal to men in voting rights. The Acts of 1884, 1918 and 1928 were all important changes in the franchise because they were all vital steps towards British democracy. Changes in electoral methods and franchise since 1868 have helped to make Britain more democratic. Britain can now say that it's franchise is completely democratic; equal opportunities for all. However the although the electoral methods have been improved since 1868 they are still not the completely democratic, as Britain still retains the 'first-past-the-post' electoral system which means that a party can gain power without 50% of the votes. Thus said though Britain is one of the fairest and most democratic countries in the world and this is largely due to the changes mentioned in this essay. Jennie Seager 125/9/2007 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Can the use of the First Past the Post electoral system be justified in ...

    5 star(s)

    The failures of the alternative systems are also important as to why FPTP is justified. There are unquestionable issues with any kind of proportional system and these mainly link to the viewed failures of coalition government. A proportional system such as that used in Germany, whilst providing greater representation to

  2. Accounts for the changes in voting behaviour in the last 30 years in UK ...

    The questions as to what can be held accountable for changes in voting behaviour in the last 30 years in UK elections, can be approached with a degree of understanding. Looking back to the mid 1970's there was clearly a change in the way people were voting with the two-party

  1. Evolution of Democracy and the Athenian Constitution

    He then left them for good. It cannot be proven that he was indispensable but the fact is that soon afterwards the Athenian fleet was captured and Athens lost the Peloponnesian War (404 B.C.). Democracy was abolished and the Spartans set up and oligarchy in Athens (Trumbach).

  2. Communism VS Democracy

    One critical distinction must be made regarding Berger&rsquos understanding of the term, and that is that the term democracy does not include all the civil and human rights associated with liberal democracy(Daniels) Similarly, by capitalism, this work will not use any other connotation of the term other than describing the

  1. How democratic was Britain by 1918

    Now large working class cities had at least some form of representation. A Corrupt and Illegal practices Act was also passed so that people could vote for who they liked and so the government would be by the people. However, this could not be because working class people could still

  2. The Parliamentary Reform and Redistribution Act of 1884 - 1885.

    The 1884 Reform Act sought to enfranchise the morally worthy and industrious. Athough the size of the electorate was widened considerably, 40% of adult males were still without the vote at the time. Source-http://www.wordiq.com/definition/Representation_of_the_People_Act_1884 The Redistribution Act 1885 William Gladstone with his Liberal Government followed up the 1884 Third Reform

  1. How democratic was Britain by 1918?

    A system had been established. The number of uncontested elections had diminishes dramatically. In 1865 the were 194 uncontested elections. By 1880 there were only 67. This decrease showed that more equality was present in the system. When there is only one candidate the people have no choice or say.

  2. Is consociational democracy democratic?

    may be taken on very small popular majorities?22 Furthermore, since accommodating strategies are not always effective, they are more easily gridlocked23 and potentially unstable24. Consequently, it seems that elite accommodation does not fulfil its proposed stabilising function and thus does not conform to the ultimate proposition of democratic stability.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work