• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Which theorist is most applicable to understanding work today, Marx, Weber or Durkheim?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

2. Which theorist is most applicable to understanding work today, Marx, Weber or Durkheim? "We often associate the notion of work with drudgery - with a set of tasks that we want to minimize and if possible escape from altogether." (Giddens, 2001: 375) Many of today's working class would probably agree, however Karl Marx views work as the means through which individual creativity may be expressed and explored. Seeing as Marx felt so strongly about work, his theory of capitalism recognized and thus criticized the dehumanizing effects and exploitative nature of work in capitalist societies. His theory is generally applicable to the understanding of work today, however after having thoroughly studied and understood his theory, I felt that he overemphasized the effect of a society's economic structure on social life. Nevertheless Marx's theory on capitalism applies to many major aspects of work today and appreciates, more than other theorists, problems faced by today's society and its labour at work. The change in the occupational structure in society today is based on the phenomenon of the division of labour. Marx, unlike Durkheim, appreciates the negative as well as the positive aspects that the division of labour imposes on work. ...read more.

Middle

The theory states that 'all forms of wealth, created for purposes of exchange, get their value from the work put into producing them' (Kettle, 1963: 32). It distinguishes between use (or intrinsic)-value and exchange-value. In the past use-value was important. People simply exchanged objects or used money to exchange goods however, in capitalist societies, exchange value is prioritised. Capitalists aim to turn commodities into money. In other words, owners are generating wealth out of human labour. For example, production by labour is exchanged for an unequal exchange of wages. Capitalists made workers work more than they (the workers) received in return, in the form of wages. The needs of people are downgraded in favour of the desires of consumers and the desires of consumers are satisfied based on the amount of money the consumers are willing to pay. This is displayed in societies today where dominance lies with those with the most money. Hence Marx argues that exchange value is dangerous and increasingly, everything will become dominated by exchange value, even morality. Marx classified labour as a unique commodity that creates value, arguing that it should not be reduced to exchange value because we are purchasing an individual's time and generating use value out of it. ...read more.

Conclusion

Therefore in an industrial world, we lose sight of many humanitarian considerations. Finally, members of society also face alienation from our community, as a population. People's relationships revolve around money and the exchange involved between members of society. Our social community has very little importance in many of our lives. Eventually humans begin to behave like economic animals. Marx's theoretical interpretation of capitalism coincides well with the society and the work lives that we encounter today. In my opinion, his focus on the treatment of human labour is fundamental to understanding work today. Nevertheless, Marx's thought overemphasizes the economic structure of society and its influential role on social life. I agree that as a result of competition, innovation and several other capitalistic features in society, many have become increasingly economic-minded and work has had de-humanising effects on many of us, however, for some, work is still an expression of individual creativity. Despite that, I found that I agreed with most of Marx's theory and developed a better and a more realistic understanding of work today. Although I agree with Weber's theory of rationalisation and feel that his interpretation of capitalism is somewhat similar to Marx's, I feel as though Weber neglected to focus adequately on the issue of the exploitation of work today. Marx seemed to appreciate the most the essence of human labour. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. The Productivity of Colonial Power

    Once again, the hard-and-fast distinctions become blurred and the metropole's citizens are confronted by something more complex: the metropole becomes a cosmopole. It is worth noting that literature is a particularly fertile field for such transcultural activities, whereby colonised peoples seek to express themselves in the modes of the coloniser,

  2. Discuss the conflicts between Employee and Employer by Marxist

    The purchaser here is any capitalism or any factory owners. It continues 'one purchased, like any commodity... Labour power is owned therefore, like a machine, and is put to work' (Campbell 1981:38) As the labour power is a commodity, so once it is purchases by factory owner, the owner has

  1. What did Karl Marx mean by 'exploitation' in a capitalist economic system?

    Effectively all profit making organisations are actually exploiting their workforce, because the wealth should be spread evenly among the workers due to surplus value being taken. (Ballinger & Olsson, 1997) There are those who argue, that exploitation of the worker has been reduced in recent times, due to increases in wages and lifestyle.

  2. Socialist uses of workers' inquiry

    class with the movement of capital and claims that it is impossible to automatically trace a study of the working class back to the movement of capital. The working class requires a completely independent scientific treatment because it operates as a conflictual - hence capitalist - as well as an antagonistic - hence anti-capitalist - factor.

  1. Karl Marx.

    When the society met in London in 1847, Marx and Engels were both present. There they wrote the Communist Manifesto. Engels wrote a first draft which was rewritten by Marx. Soon after its publication, the February Revolution of 1848 broke out in France.

  2. Assess popper's treatment of the problem of induction

    science then he would also be able to impact upon that of the social sciences as well. The problem of induction is the OTU theory, stated above, in a simplistic form. Up until the workings of Popper the traditional scientist is thought of as making observations of the world around them, looking for regularities, patterns and consistencies or otherwise.

  1. Compare and contrast Marx and Engels with Mill regarding social and economic progress

    Mill lived through a period of time where great social change was occurring. In the C19th religious beliefs were eroding as no new faiths developed. Therefore a 'general source of ideas and maxims of morality and politics' (Routledge Philosophy Guidebook)

  2. The Search for independence, Macedonia

    There were two ethnic Albanian parties - the party for Democratic Prosperity (PDP) and the more radical National Democratic Party. There were the first signs that the Albanian minorities were becoming increasing radicals.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work