• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Who benefits and who loses when a common market for labour is extended to more countries? Explain your answer with reference to economic theory and to EU experience. Comment also on the future implications of the 2004 enlargement.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Who benefits and who loses when a common market for labour is extended to more countries? Explain your answer with reference to economic theory and to EU experience. Comment also on the future implications of the 2004 enlargement. Many people talk about the 'common market', by which they meant the European Economic Community in its early decades. Ths is a group of geographically close European nations among which there is free trade and a common external tariff with free movement of capital, labour and enterprise as well as goods. Under the Treaty of Rome (1957) the member states agreed not only to form a customs union but also to form a common market. It had envisaged that there would be a fully free common market in the EEC within 12 years, but intra EEC economic activity evolved in a highly imperfect way with significant trade barriers remaining in many sectors. Policy makers were fustrated for it was often difficult to put European market policy high on the agenda, and it was not untill the mid 1980s that the issue of the creation of the Single European Market became the central concern. ...read more.

Middle

So basically forming a common market would result in migration of workers from Poland to Germany with the convergence of productivity of workers and convergence of wage rates creating higher output in the common market. Income redistribution within the countries would also take place, where in Germany from workers to capital and vice versa in Poland. So in this situation Germany loses from creating a common market and Poland gains. However these effects depend on economic assumptions made such as full employment and wage flexibility. Also wage differentials arise from differences in the capital-labour ratio and not differences in skills. There is no need for migration to get equal wages, 'free trade' (as in the CU) could bring this about under certain conditions. If Poland specialises in exporting goods which require much labour in their production this increases the demand or labour in Poland and wages increase. There would be the opposite trend in Germany which specialises in goods which need little labour. The free movement of capital without free movement of labour could also equalise wage rates. This would all result in firms relocating from areas with high wage rates to areas with low wage rates. ...read more.

Conclusion

may be at the expense of stronger integration between members (deepening of the EU). Deepening might be the issue which attracts new members (prospect of more help) while widening may be an incentive for some major reforms (e.g. CAP) because of future unacceptable cost burdens. In terms of cost and CAP, one scenario estimate is an extra 2bn ECU needed to subsidise farmers facing lower prices from the CEEC economies. Another scenario is if financial support was not given to maintain prices then farmers would lose 3.7bn ECU. Both taxpayers and consumers could benefit. There will also be a large increase in spending on structural and cohesion funds which include various funds such as Regional and Social Funds. This could raise by an extra 42bn ECU. However many believe this figure is too high because these countries would not be able to absorb such high levels of spending. All-in-all, Baldwin places the net cost of enlargement at 19bn ECU (per year) or about 20% of the EU budget. However, the Agenda 2000 proposals are less generous stating 11bn (per year). Gradualism is the key theme and it is very difficult to quantify long term impacts. Overall the EU enlaregment has occured and only time will tell if it was a wise and successull move for all involved. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. To what extent does the experience of European integration confirm the conclusions of theory ...

    but in which the countries set tariffs against the outside world independently. Alternatively they can establish a customs union, in which a group of countries agree to eliminate tariffs between themselves and set a common external tariff on imports from the rest of the world.

  2. Is there a democratic deficit in the EU? What are its implications and how ...

    The use of Qualified Majority Voting in the Council entails weighted votes. Larger countries such as the UK, Germany and France all have a lot more votes over countries such as Luxembourg and most of the new members for example Estonia.

  1. The Importance of the Cyprus Issue in terms of the Accomplishment of the ESDP

    On 4 July 1990, the government of the Republic of Cyprus applied for membership in the European Union. Since then, substantial legislative and economic reforms have been undertaken in Southern Cyprus to conform more closely to the requirements of the Union.

  2. The EU automotive industry currently faces a number of issues. It lags behind the ...

    It still operates under communist rule, but has since developed even more rapidly than its Eastern Europe counterpart in the past few years and is continuing at a higher level of growth. It also has low production costs and an even greater labour force, which means that China is more capable of higher productivity.

  1. Economic and political integration between the member states of the European Union means that ...

    The talks on Economic and Monetary Union were resumed after 1985, when EMU progressively started to be considered a necessary complement to the single market. In 1988 Jacques Delors who was the President of the European Commission was asked to study the creation of the EMU.

  2. International Economics

    to the bigger, better off places causing more competition for jobs in these areas which will in effect lead to high unemployment figures. Another major factor would be that the EU would dictate the amount of government spending each country can do, is that really what we want to live

  1. Critically discuss how global economic trend may impact upon the future policies of the ...

    Even though the Treaty of Rome decrees fundamental mobility of workers, free movement of people was significantly initiated through FSM and Social Character at European Trade Union Confederation. EU citizens are eligible to work within Member States of one's choice with certain social rights and protections(Nicoll and Salmon, 2001).

  2. What are the advantages and disadvantages of EU enlargement?

    The European union will also now have a stronger role in world affairs, which is strengthened dramatically every time a new member joins. Such areas will include foreign policy, trade policy and in other parts of global governance. The economy of each country will be boosted and latest research shows

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work