• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Who benefits and who loses when a common market for labour is extended to more countries? Explain your answer with reference to economic theory and to EU experience. Comment also on the future implications of the 2004 enlargement.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Who benefits and who loses when a common market for labour is extended to more countries? Explain your answer with reference to economic theory and to EU experience. Comment also on the future implications of the 2004 enlargement. Many people talk about the 'common market', by which they meant the European Economic Community in its early decades. Ths is a group of geographically close European nations among which there is free trade and a common external tariff with free movement of capital, labour and enterprise as well as goods. Under the Treaty of Rome (1957) the member states agreed not only to form a customs union but also to form a common market. It had envisaged that there would be a fully free common market in the EEC within 12 years, but intra EEC economic activity evolved in a highly imperfect way with significant trade barriers remaining in many sectors. Policy makers were fustrated for it was often difficult to put European market policy high on the agenda, and it was not untill the mid 1980s that the issue of the creation of the Single European Market became the central concern. ...read more.

Middle

So basically forming a common market would result in migration of workers from Poland to Germany with the convergence of productivity of workers and convergence of wage rates creating higher output in the common market. Income redistribution within the countries would also take place, where in Germany from workers to capital and vice versa in Poland. So in this situation Germany loses from creating a common market and Poland gains. However these effects depend on economic assumptions made such as full employment and wage flexibility. Also wage differentials arise from differences in the capital-labour ratio and not differences in skills. There is no need for migration to get equal wages, 'free trade' (as in the CU) could bring this about under certain conditions. If Poland specialises in exporting goods which require much labour in their production this increases the demand or labour in Poland and wages increase. There would be the opposite trend in Germany which specialises in goods which need little labour. The free movement of capital without free movement of labour could also equalise wage rates. This would all result in firms relocating from areas with high wage rates to areas with low wage rates. ...read more.

Conclusion

may be at the expense of stronger integration between members (deepening of the EU). Deepening might be the issue which attracts new members (prospect of more help) while widening may be an incentive for some major reforms (e.g. CAP) because of future unacceptable cost burdens. In terms of cost and CAP, one scenario estimate is an extra 2bn ECU needed to subsidise farmers facing lower prices from the CEEC economies. Another scenario is if financial support was not given to maintain prices then farmers would lose 3.7bn ECU. Both taxpayers and consumers could benefit. There will also be a large increase in spending on structural and cohesion funds which include various funds such as Regional and Social Funds. This could raise by an extra 42bn ECU. However many believe this figure is too high because these countries would not be able to absorb such high levels of spending. All-in-all, Baldwin places the net cost of enlargement at 19bn ECU (per year) or about 20% of the EU budget. However, the Agenda 2000 proposals are less generous stating 11bn (per year). Gradualism is the key theme and it is very difficult to quantify long term impacts. Overall the EU enlaregment has occured and only time will tell if it was a wise and successull move for all involved. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. Why did many British colonies demand independence from Britain in the years immediately after ...

    This encouraged them to grow more and more. Then the EEC had built up huge stores of unwanted products- butter 'mountain' and wines 'lakes'. Also the EEC spent far more on this than anything else. So Britain was not happy that 65% of the money goes towards the CAP.

  2. Critically discuss how global economic trend may impact upon the future policies of the ...

    in terms of productivity and costs effectiveness, for instance: Hong Kong Shanghai Bank Corporation has re-allocated 4000 jobs from United Kingdom(UK) to Asia, mostly to India(http://us.rediff.com/money/2003/oct/17bpo.htm). With HSBC staff face the axe of job cuts, it shows a trend of sweeping western firms in tourism sector are shifting jobs to low-wage and low-welfare nations.

  1. On balance, is the EU's enlargement likely to have a positive or negative effecton ...

    Since then the Council and European Parliament have introduced more stringency and precision into the Commission's proposal in order to make it clearer and more concrete. The environmental action programme adopted includes objectives, timetables and programmes of measures, and will be more binding than previous environmental action programmes.

  2. The Institution of the European Union and Theories.

    To overcome some of the above a firm can move production to a cheaper labour country this will save the firm huge costs. E Justifications The above theories will help firms to compete more effectively as there is ground rules set and firms will have to follow them.

  1. Why has the Common Agricultural Policy proved so controversial?

    However, we now have a situation where European farmers are engaged in gross over-production. So much so that European stockpiles of surplus food are referred to as "butter mountains" and "wine lakes". This increase in agricultural production is not reflected in demand, and therefore creates surpluses which must later be

  2. To what extent does the experience of European integration confirm the conclusions of theory ...

    NFATA), customs union, common market, economic union, total integration. Customs union is a typical form of economic integration. With the exception of a FTA, other forms of economic integration are gradually formed based on customs union by expanding its field or content.

  1. Is there a democratic deficit in the EU? What are its implications and how ...

    Whilst in 2004 turnout did increase in the UK (39%), this was probably more to it being 'Super Thursday' than any real desire to engage in European politics and the E.P.'s inability to ignite flames of passion within its citizens can be seen in the appalling turnout in the 10

  2. The Importance of the Cyprus Issue in terms of the Accomplishment of the ESDP

    actions, and, justification for its projection of its own security understanding to its peripheries. Although the EU has always stood with the claim that it would accomodate any sort of settlement the parties reach without making any preference for the sake of any of the parties, the way it has acted has the potential of complicating the issue further.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work