• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Who benefits and who loses when a common market for labour is extended to more countries? Explain your answer with reference to economic theory and to EU experience. Comment also on the future implications of the 2004 enlargement.

Extracts from this document...


Who benefits and who loses when a common market for labour is extended to more countries? Explain your answer with reference to economic theory and to EU experience. Comment also on the future implications of the 2004 enlargement. Many people talk about the 'common market', by which they meant the European Economic Community in its early decades. Ths is a group of geographically close European nations among which there is free trade and a common external tariff with free movement of capital, labour and enterprise as well as goods. Under the Treaty of Rome (1957) the member states agreed not only to form a customs union but also to form a common market. It had envisaged that there would be a fully free common market in the EEC within 12 years, but intra EEC economic activity evolved in a highly imperfect way with significant trade barriers remaining in many sectors. Policy makers were fustrated for it was often difficult to put European market policy high on the agenda, and it was not untill the mid 1980s that the issue of the creation of the Single European Market became the central concern. ...read more.


So basically forming a common market would result in migration of workers from Poland to Germany with the convergence of productivity of workers and convergence of wage rates creating higher output in the common market. Income redistribution within the countries would also take place, where in Germany from workers to capital and vice versa in Poland. So in this situation Germany loses from creating a common market and Poland gains. However these effects depend on economic assumptions made such as full employment and wage flexibility. Also wage differentials arise from differences in the capital-labour ratio and not differences in skills. There is no need for migration to get equal wages, 'free trade' (as in the CU) could bring this about under certain conditions. If Poland specialises in exporting goods which require much labour in their production this increases the demand or labour in Poland and wages increase. There would be the opposite trend in Germany which specialises in goods which need little labour. The free movement of capital without free movement of labour could also equalise wage rates. This would all result in firms relocating from areas with high wage rates to areas with low wage rates. ...read more.


may be at the expense of stronger integration between members (deepening of the EU). Deepening might be the issue which attracts new members (prospect of more help) while widening may be an incentive for some major reforms (e.g. CAP) because of future unacceptable cost burdens. In terms of cost and CAP, one scenario estimate is an extra 2bn ECU needed to subsidise farmers facing lower prices from the CEEC economies. Another scenario is if financial support was not given to maintain prices then farmers would lose 3.7bn ECU. Both taxpayers and consumers could benefit. There will also be a large increase in spending on structural and cohesion funds which include various funds such as Regional and Social Funds. This could raise by an extra 42bn ECU. However many believe this figure is too high because these countries would not be able to absorb such high levels of spending. All-in-all, Baldwin places the net cost of enlargement at 19bn ECU (per year) or about 20% of the EU budget. However, the Agenda 2000 proposals are less generous stating 11bn (per year). Gradualism is the key theme and it is very difficult to quantify long term impacts. Overall the EU enlaregment has occured and only time will tell if it was a wise and successull move for all involved. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. The Common Agricultural Policy.

    Therefore the CAP, encouraged the use of intensive crop and livestock production technique, which resulted in the removal of hedgerows, walls and ditches, and also the use of agri-chemicals. This resulted in several consequences: * Firstly there is a dynamic effect.

  2. In 1957 the Common

    (EL Agrai, Ali. M. 2001) The area of support within the EAGGF ensures that farmers have a market for their goods setting prices which allows farmers to have a standard of living equal to that of those working within other sectors of the economy.

  1. Austria - An economic and political overview.

    Economic Situation Austria depends heavily on foreign trade, which is not surprising for a small European country. Its central location in Europe reinforces that dependency and gives Austria a wide range of trading partners in both Eastern Europe and Western Europe.

  2. EU enlargement essay.

    that they are relatively poorer compared to the current countries. Poland is the most extreme country that will join the EU, it has the largest land mass of over 120 000 square miles (1/10 the total size of the EU)

  1. Why did many British colonies demand independence from Britain in the years immediately after ...

    In this question, I want to describe how Britain's relationship with the EEC changed between 1953-73. I will look at the issues around Britain and the EEC, and how the EEC perceived Britain and Britain perceiving the EEC. I would be talking about how the leading figures took action within the EEC and Britain.

  2. An assessement of the impact of the lawyers' establishment directive.

    field of recognition of qualifications on the basis of mutual trust between Member States ...."40. This progress and accord amongst the Member States might underscore the true and veritable impact of the Lawyers' Establishment Directive on the market for legal services in the European Union, and indeed, may have proven

  1. Is there a democratic deficit in the EU? What are its implications and how ...

    voters generally have a very low knowledge about the European Union and little interest in it. Election turnout for the Union as a whole has dropped to around 45%, hardly enough to claim full democratic legitimacy and turnout, unless compulsory such as in countries like Luxemburg, is lower than at general elections, especially in the UK.

  2. The Importance of the Cyprus Issue in terms of the Accomplishment of the ESDP

    the water even more.2 However, such an attitude may not be able to bring an everlasting solution to the problem as the Greek Cypriots may not feel the necessity to sit on the table for negotiation given that it has the ability to reach its aims on the grounds of the EU.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work