• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Who benefits and who loses when a common market for labour is extended to more countries? Explain your answer with reference to economic theory and to EU experience. Comment also on the future implications of the 2004 enlargement.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Who benefits and who loses when a common market for labour is extended to more countries? Explain your answer with reference to economic theory and to EU experience. Comment also on the future implications of the 2004 enlargement. Many people talk about the 'common market', by which they meant the European Economic Community in its early decades. Ths is a group of geographically close European nations among which there is free trade and a common external tariff with free movement of capital, labour and enterprise as well as goods. Under the Treaty of Rome (1957) the member states agreed not only to form a customs union but also to form a common market. It had envisaged that there would be a fully free common market in the EEC within 12 years, but intra EEC economic activity evolved in a highly imperfect way with significant trade barriers remaining in many sectors. Policy makers were fustrated for it was often difficult to put European market policy high on the agenda, and it was not untill the mid 1980s that the issue of the creation of the Single European Market became the central concern. ...read more.

Middle

So basically forming a common market would result in migration of workers from Poland to Germany with the convergence of productivity of workers and convergence of wage rates creating higher output in the common market. Income redistribution within the countries would also take place, where in Germany from workers to capital and vice versa in Poland. So in this situation Germany loses from creating a common market and Poland gains. However these effects depend on economic assumptions made such as full employment and wage flexibility. Also wage differentials arise from differences in the capital-labour ratio and not differences in skills. There is no need for migration to get equal wages, 'free trade' (as in the CU) could bring this about under certain conditions. If Poland specialises in exporting goods which require much labour in their production this increases the demand or labour in Poland and wages increase. There would be the opposite trend in Germany which specialises in goods which need little labour. The free movement of capital without free movement of labour could also equalise wage rates. This would all result in firms relocating from areas with high wage rates to areas with low wage rates. ...read more.

Conclusion

may be at the expense of stronger integration between members (deepening of the EU). Deepening might be the issue which attracts new members (prospect of more help) while widening may be an incentive for some major reforms (e.g. CAP) because of future unacceptable cost burdens. In terms of cost and CAP, one scenario estimate is an extra 2bn ECU needed to subsidise farmers facing lower prices from the CEEC economies. Another scenario is if financial support was not given to maintain prices then farmers would lose 3.7bn ECU. Both taxpayers and consumers could benefit. There will also be a large increase in spending on structural and cohesion funds which include various funds such as Regional and Social Funds. This could raise by an extra 42bn ECU. However many believe this figure is too high because these countries would not be able to absorb such high levels of spending. All-in-all, Baldwin places the net cost of enlargement at 19bn ECU (per year) or about 20% of the EU budget. However, the Agenda 2000 proposals are less generous stating 11bn (per year). Gradualism is the key theme and it is very difficult to quantify long term impacts. Overall the EU enlaregment has occured and only time will tell if it was a wise and successull move for all involved. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. Economic and political integration between the member states of the European Union means that ...

    last movement of Ludwig van Beethoven's Ninth Symphony, was recognised by the European Council in Milan on 28-29 June 1985, as the anthem of the European Union. In this context, it also is an ode to freedom, to a sense of community and to peace among the citizens of the

  2. "Analyse and compare the gains predicted by economic theory from theremoval of (a) tariff ...

    The move to establish a Single European Market (SEM) was simply a programme to enable the EU to create a single market. As said before the EU has been committed to establishing the common market since the treaty of Rome was signed in 1957. Before agreement was reached to establish the market by the end of 1992, there had been little progress in creating this.

  1. European integration is motivated by Political, Economic and Security consideration and it is the ...

    reasons: > Lower input costs > Responsiveness to profit through utilisation of production capacity and the use of best practice production techniques > Removal of non-tariff barriers > Cross-frontier research & development The industrial sectors, which are most likely to be affected and stand to win, is: * Telecommunications and

  2. To what extent does the experience of European integration confirm the conclusions of theory ...

    NFATA), customs union, common market, economic union, total integration. Customs union is a typical form of economic integration. With the exception of a FTA, other forms of economic integration are gradually formed based on customs union by expanding its field or content.

  1. Is there a democratic deficit in the EU? What are its implications and how ...

    new member states who had joined only weeks before the 2004 elections. Furthermore being democratic is about representation for these delegates but at the Parliament there is a debate as to who the MEPs are actually representing. Most voters seem to take the opportunity to give the incumbent national government

  2. The Importance of the Cyprus Issue in terms of the Accomplishment of the ESDP

    actions, and, justification for its projection of its own security understanding to its peripheries. Although the EU has always stood with the claim that it would accomodate any sort of settlement the parties reach without making any preference for the sake of any of the parties, the way it has acted has the potential of complicating the issue further.

  1. The EU automotive industry currently faces a number of issues. It lags behind the ...

    May 2004 saw ten more countries join the European Union, eight of which are Central and Eastern European countries. EU membership has brought a number of benefits to these countries, including structural reforms, setting standards for wages, training and technology transfers.

  2. International Economics

    If that was to happen to the UK and we were left in a bad recession and we had handed over the power of interest rates and certain polices to the European central bank in Brussels then we lose a lot of the power over our decision making and if

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work