• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why and how have liberals supported the fragmentation of political power? (15)

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Why and how have liberal supported the fragmentation of political power? (15) In the liberal view, power tends to corrupt human beings as they believe humans are essentially self-seeking and are therefore likely to use any position of power to pursue their own interests, probably at the expense of others. The greater the concentration of power, the greater the incentive people have to both benefit themselves and use others to this end. This is why absolute power plus egoism leads to corruption and one of the reasons why liberals have supported the fragmentation of political power. A quote by Lord Acton was that ?power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely? Liberals therefore fear arbitrary government and uphold the principle of limited government. Liberals believe government can be limited through the establishment of constitutional constraints and by democracy. Liberals believe in the fragmentation of political power as it has many advantages. It ensures that those who exercise power have only a limited ability to influence other citizens, thus preventing absolute power. ...read more.


Liberals have supported the fragmentation of political power by having a constitution. A constitution is a set of rules that govern the government itself and defines the extent of government power and limits its exercise. The power of government bodies and politicians can be limited by external and legal constraints. A codified constitution codifies the major powers and responsibilities of government institutions within a single authorative document. A codified constitution codifies higher law. The first codified constitution was the US constitution but now all liberal democracies have one except for the UK, Israel and New Zealand. Another way it supports the fragmentation of political power is through the bill of rights. This entrenches individual rights by providing a legal definition of the relationship between the individual and the state. This limits government power by limiting their control over the actions of the individual and protects individual liberty. Where there is no codified constitution or bill of rights liberals stress the importance of statute law in checking government power through the principle of the rule of law. ...read more.


The democratic solution to conflict is the application of the majority rule which liberals describe as tyranny of the majority. Majoritarianism would have a great effect on elections and referendums as governments could be elected that are in fact unwanted by many individuals and decisions in referendums could go against what many individuals want, thereby permitting government to do things that individuals do not want. Individual liberty and majority rights can be crushed in the name of the people. The best defence against majoritarianism is a network of checks and balances that would make government responsive to competing minorities. Democracy limits government through consent and the idea that citizens must have a means of protecting themselves from the encroachment of government. Utilitarian theorists developed the notion of democracy as a form of protection for the individual into a case for universal suffrage. Utilitarianism implies that individuals will vote so as to defend their interests as they define them. Therefore the government elected is most likely the one wanted by individuals, ensuring that they are still in control. Therefore we can now see how and why liberal have supported the fragmentation of power. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. The Productivity of Colonial Power

    In other areas and colonial situations, there was an opposite movement from 'self' to 'other': colonial élites, carrying with them the identity of the metropole, found themselves estranged from it in a foreign land. As the stereotypes became increasingly inadequate to deal with the complexity of the colonial experience, they

  2. "Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely" why do liberals believe this ...

    Classical liberals, such as Acton, did not believe in democracy because the majority could crush individual liberty and minority rights, de Tocqueville said that there is a danger of the "tyranny of the majority".

  1. Political Power

    First of all, since only the key decisions are studied, it raises the problem of how far we are capable of distinguishing key issues and routine issues which are often ignored.

  2. Explain why the Liberals were electorally so successful so often, 1868-85?

    freedom of the individual whilst conforming to free trade and cheap governance: the state would enable, but not provide; mediate, not dictate. This, Gladstone felt morally obliged to uphold, particularly following the death of Peel (his political mentor) in 1850.

  1. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    The most salient feature of these efforts is that all of them failed. On the right, Vladimir Zhirinovsky rebuffed the desire of several small nationalist parties to seek an alliance with his Liberal Democratic Party of Russia (LDPR). On the left, it was the more substantial Communist Party of the

  2. Notes on John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

    Further, Mill claims that there is good reason to believe that it is beneficial to society for the government to have a strict policy of never passing laws which restrict actions which do not involve harm to others. Brief statement of the Harm Principle: Mill formulates what is called the

  1. Why Do Liberals Place Such Importance On The Concept Of Liberty?

    Both were fighting for power as before this, the monarchy had supreme rights and in 1688 the Glorious Revolution took place, which resulted in James II stepping down as King after trying to force Catholicism on the nation. This is said to have been the groundings for Locke's work.

  2. Does J.S.Mill abandon Utilitarianism?

    two, you as the person must have experienced both of these pleasures to say which is more preferable to one. If you haven't experienced both pleasures then it is not possible for you to make a distinction, as you have nothing compare the one pleasure you have already consumed with.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work