• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why did Stalin make the "Great Turn"?

Extracts from this document...


Why did Stalin make the "Great Turn"? Many Communists saw the NEP as a retreat from Communist Ideology. It was seen as a promotion of private ownership, trade and profit, as well as being responsible for the rise in new "petty bourgeoisie" classes such as NEP men and Kulaks. It was seen as a policy that promoted the interests of the peasantry, a group that were seen as generally capitalist and potentially threatening to the pace of revolution. Thus a policy of increased state control of industry and commerce would rid the state of these contradictory classes. It would push Russia further onwards in terms of a state free from private trade and ownership. However ideology is often seen as Stalin's weak point however, since he is often thought of as frequently changing policies to further his political aspirations. ...read more.


The problems in ideology could be seen to link to the problems with agriculture as it was the Kulak class that Stalin held responsible for hoarding the grain and demanding higher prices for it, thus if the ideology changed to rid Soviet society of such elements, then haste could be seen to be of importance. However this was not the only problem with Russian agriculture. Farming methods were fundamentally backwards and unproductive, to the extent that parts of Russia were up to 500 years behind Britain. Furthermore the peasantry, who had little notion of communist ideology, could hold the government to ransom under the conditions of the NEP, since they controlled agricultural production. This situation was undesirable in a country so reliant on agriculture for its industry, since grain needed to be procured to provide capital investment to fund industry, and also to feed the urban workforce. ...read more.


Britain and Poland had broken off diplomatic relations with Stalin, as well as Chinese Nationalists attacking Communists. These were combined with existing fears that the West were set on destroying Communism, after they gave the Whites assistance during the Civil War. On encountering the choice between speeding up modernisation, thereby increasing military strength, and remaining vulnerable and at the mercy of the peasantry (as the Tsar found himself in 1916 after grain shortfalls). If this situation was, as some historians argue, the case then Stalin stood up to the challenge and took decisive action, thereby initiating his "Great Turn" more quickly to deal with a hostile political climate. Therefore I conclude, that the need for security from invasion acted as a catalyst, in initiating Soviet reform of agriculture and ideology, although without the distinct inefficiency of Soviet agriculture or the mass discontent at the NEP, then this would not have been the case. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    Whether based on the formal distribution of power and authority or on the definition of roles expectations about these interactions may cause one to miss the point completely. As one leading American political scientist observed, the essence of leadership in politics is to bring about group cohesion directed toward

  2. The study of international or rather global politics, seeks to provide an account of ...

    In this context, international relations is governed by the contracts between sovereign authorities and these contracts are dependent on the arbitrary will of autonomous participants. According to the realist perspective, anarchy is a defining characteristic of international politics because without a Leviathan, hegemon or world state, states as unitary, sovereign

  1. Breaking down the Walls: A Discourse of Ideology and "Otherness"

    born with these same racial attitudes and lifestyle based solely on skin color. Wright's critique of ideology develops because he could see that people of all races were merely performing a role. That is, they acted just like society said they should or should not.

  2. To what extent was the Tsar a Liberator?

    This in itself is a monumentous achievement, and if we think in this vein, then yes, Alexander should be deemed the Tsar Liberator. The argument is even more compelling when we think of the freedom they gained from the brutal, oppressive landlords.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work