• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why does Locke's political theory contain an account of property rights? Does this account succeed in serving his purpose?

Extracts from this document...


Why does Locke's political theory contain an account of property rights? Does this account succeed in serving his purpose? Locke, following Hobbes, based his second treatise on the state of nature. However for Locke the state of nature was a moral code whereas for Hobbes it was essentially behavioural. Locke, who with many of his time was deeply religious, based his politics on the moral obligation of man to God, by way of a set of duties owed to Him. Locke argued that self-preservation was important, as with this comes the freedom to continue to discharge ones duty to God. Locke spent the vast majority of his first treatise forming a critique of Robert Filmer's Patriarcha. Filmer argued that as God granted Adam the right to private property and that the monarchs of the world were descended from Adam, then all property within their dominion was their private property. However Locke argues that God gave the world to man in common and that 'every Man has a Property in his own Person'1. ...read more.


Locke doesn't not bring the concept of employed labour into his treatise in a formal way, although we can take it that he assumes it as he states that 'Thus the grass my horse has bit; the turfs my servant has cut; and the ore I have digged...become my property'2. This takes Locke's theory of property rights to another level as the economy moved from a very oversimplified view, arguably the type of economy that existed in biblical days of individuals and their families, to one of Locke's time, that of large land owners and paid employment. It is from this that Locke moves towards his introduction to labour theory of value, as he says that those without land can seek employment from those that have and that the labour they have will have a value to the employer, as he posses more land than he cultivate on his own and without that labour the land has a diminished, or indeed no, value. ...read more.


If his overriding aim was to offer a critique of Filmer, then it must be said that he puts forward a convincing alternative argument and although very controversial at the time it certainly rings truer today than Filmer's theory. Indeed if nothing else Locke's views on labour certainly laid the foundation for Ricardo's and Marx's work on his labour theory of value. However during his lifetime Locke's two treatise didn't incite the political change that he hoped they would and so if Locke hoped that his papers would change much in Britain he was to be sadly disappointed. However they had a profound effect much nearly a century later. It is often argued that Locke's philosophy was instrumental in the drafting of the US constitution. And in France, Voltaire was a supporter of Locke although the French never embraced his theory of property rights during their revolution. Overall I think it can be stated that Locke's account of property rights does fulfil its purpose to a certain extent although it didn't have the immediate effect that he hoped for. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    251), and the way to do it is through labor. He (1688) says that "every man has a property in his own person" (p. 251), and therefore the work of his hand belongs to him as well. So by adding labor to property we add something of our own to

  2. Deontology- a theory based purely on obligation or duty.

    The wrongs within the mind could be easily recognized due to a great reliance on rules and moral justice, not just the consequences or ending results of the situations. For example, the laws of each country are based on a consensus of moral and religious beliefs.

  1. Socialist uses of workers' inquiry

    The profit motive is not just the result of greed on behalf of individual capitalists. They do not have a choice about it. The need to make a profit is imposed on capitalists as a condition for not losing their investments and their position as capitalists.

  2. Evaluate Machiavelli's account of therelations between ethics and politics

    So a prince has of necessity to be so prudent that he know how to escape the evil reputation attached to those vices which could lose him his state, and how to avoid those vices which are not so dangerous, if he possibly can; but, if he cannot, he need

  1. Is political theory useful?

    'Men being, as has been said by nature all free, equal, and independent, no one can be put out of this estate, and subjected to the political power of another, without his own consent. Men can agree with other men and unite into a community.

  2. Explain Marx's account of the relationship between technological and political change

    Under capitalism, there was private ownership of external things, but not people. And in Marx's communist societies, neither persons nor productive resources were private owned. Thus the modes of production (in other words, the technological situation) or the economic structure is a set of property relations.

  1. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    Additionally, independents contested in every district, whereas parties contested in much fewer, ranging from the Communist Party contesting in 57 percent of the districts to the Movement in Support of the Army party contesting in 8 percent, with the average party contesting in only 32 percent.

  2. Compare Hobbes and Locke's views on the obligation to obey the law.

    understood as not being interfered with by other people or the state, the centrepiece of their political beliefs) this is the only way you can become obliged to obey another (the principle of self-imposition) because (in Locke?s case) humans have a natural right to liberty, and thus no-one has a

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work