• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why does Marx believe that capitalism will inevitably give way to socialism?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Why does Marx believe that capitalism will inevitably give way to socialism? Why did Karl Marx remain steadfast in his opinion regarding capitalism? He believed that socialism would be an inescapable consequence of the structure he was so critical of. What were the reasons for this belief? This essay sets out to answer this question. The topics of capitalism and socialism will be looked at in detail, as well as the explanation of why Marx is so influential in these areas. This essay will also discuss whether Marx's utopian vision has come to fruit as he envisaged, or has it remained to be just a theory. Karl Marx (1818- 83), a German economic critic, political activist and philosopher, is viewed as one of the founding fathers of sociology. His writings and theories have influenced many and he remains to be a much talked about figure in academia, sociological circles and beyond. A theoretical school of sociology has its roots in Marx's philosophies. It is believed that until recently, one -third of the world's population lived under governmental regimes inspired by Marx's ideas (Marshall, 1998, p393), the Soviet Union being an example. The essence of Marx's work was on the formation and the nature of modern society, and how capitalism and the class struggle played its part in this. His most famous work, Das Kapital (1867 - 95) contained his hope for the social revolution, which would eventually overthrow capitalism, as the essay question refers to. Marx began his theories by drawing from the basic knowledge, that in order to survive, humans have to produce the food and material objects, which will aid their subsistence. ...read more.

Middle

This surplus product gives the owner extra profit, therefore acting as surplus value. Marx argued that this surplus value originated from the exploitation of the labourer by the capitalist, an argument that can now be expanded. As has been explained: under the capitalist system a labourer produces a value for the capitalist that is in excess of the value of their wage. This quite clearly, is an exploitative relationship. The labourer fails to see this however due to the hourly wage system put in place. The capitalist ideology also masks the exploitative nature of this system. It is sold to society as a social order based on individual freedom, equality and justice when it is clearly not, as the labourer has little control over their labour while the capitalist appropriates the product of the workers labour (Giddens, 2001, p12). Citizenship is also a supposed right in this free and equal state, yet the majority were denied voting rights due to the property qualifications issue. (Giddens, 1986, p37). This particular situation sees a society ripe for conflict as Marx theorised. Class conflict was already in place, due to the owners of capital exploiting the workers who were forced to sell their labour power. Marx referred to these new workers as the proletariat. This was a new class, which had risen alongside the Industrial Revolution and could be said to be the working class of the Nineteenth Century. Alongside the formation of the proletariat was the development of the bourgeoisie. The bourgeoisie took over from the feudal lords and installed themselves into the new epoch as capitalists. ...read more.

Conclusion

The 'dictatorship of the proletariat' (Tignor et.al. 2001, p257) would not take their place in society as the ruling class, like the capitalists before them. They would act in the interests of all humanity. At the time of Marx's writing the German Social Democratic Party were in power and the number of proletariat were increasing, so it seemed, that this prophecy was feasible. As history shows, Marx's ideas had an impact on the world, although only after his death. Socialism did not become a universal epoch as he had predicted although a certain political party would like this not to be the case (Scottish Socialist Party). Many of his expectations about the future course of the revolutionary movement have, so far, failed to materialise, as he did not envisage the divisions, which would occur within the working class. However, his stress on the economic factor in society and his analysis of the class structure in class conflict does have accuracy and truth. The process of contemporary globalisation could be said to be proletarising the entire globe as Marx predicted capitalism would do. In conclusion, this essay has shown the reasons why Marx believed socialism was an inevitable consequence to capitalism. While Marx's arguments were compelling and could be applied to certain issues of the 21st Century his vision of socialism did not occur as his theory suggested, particular parts of the world took up his ideas but these were not typical capitalist societies as Marx had described, i.e. the Soviet Union. He still is and will always remain to be an iconic figure to many. Marx and his ideas will not retreat into the background quietly. Social Theory, Modernity and the Industrial Age 0205866 SO202 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. What did Karl Marx mean by 'exploitation' in a capitalist economic system?

    agriculture increases, the application of machinery grows, peasant economy falls into the noose of money-capital, it declines and sinks into ruin, burdened by its backward technique. In agriculture, the decline of small-scale production assumes different forms, but the decline itself is an indisputable fact.

  2. 'Socialists have disagreed on both the means and ends of socialism' - Discuss

    counter-revolution by the dispossessed bourgeoisie has passed, at which time the state will wither away. The use of revolution tends to lead to fundamentalist ends. With the complete overthrow of the old order an entirely new system can be put in place, and in the past this has often led to dictatorship and repression for several reasons.

  1. The rise of the Labour Party had more to do with class consciousness than ...

    this time, and made the foundation of an independent working class party inevitable. Pressures were placed upon the labour force to compete with foreign markets by improved productivity, seeing an increase in use of technology and a decrease in craftsmanship, with the beauty of the finished product of much less importance.

  2. Why did Marx and Engels believe that history was on their side?

    The main point is that the state works exclusively for the interests of a certain elitist group - in capitalist society that group is the bourgeoisie. (Hall and Gieben, Page 113). That is the main backbone of Marx's argument, that, in Capitalist Society, the state works with the bourgeoisie and aids and exaggerates its exploitative relationship with the proletariat.

  1. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    Rather, one must search for compromise that will not involve lowest-common-denominator agreements or place at risk the organization's goals. These dangers complicate problem-solving, but they also can and do impel a search for the type of organizational learning that such complicated circumstances require (Kriesberg 1998; Wise 1994).

  2. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    second type of equality however, would entail the taking of resources from families that are financially well off and distributing it to other families to ensure that every member of the society starts out with the wealth as everyone else.

  1. "Ideology played relatively small role in the revolutions of 1848" Discuss.

    The opposition started to organise banquets, one of which, on the 22 of February, was banned. In spite of this, a crowd still gathered in the planned venue. Manifestation lasted till the next day until the government sent the military troops.

  2. This essay is aimed to distinguished between what Marx mean by Alienation in relation ...

    Now how is this possible? How can we, or our lives, be in opposition to or not in the proper relationship to our very nature? To clarify this we must little more closely at what our nature or species being is. Why is productive activity central to our nature?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work