• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why has it proved so difficult to find a solution to the Israeli-Palestine conflict?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Why has it proved so difficult to find a solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? Israeli-Palestinian conflict emerged after the Israel was formed. The reason was that Palestinian land was given to Israelis, by the UK, after the WW2 in order to create new state for Jews so they could prevent things like Holocaust happening to them in the future. There were conflicts in the Middle-East that time with Israel but real fight began only in 1980s. From the 1980s the Israel-Palestinian conflict became the main focus of attention in the Middle East. On December 9, 1987, an Israeli truck driver accidentally killed four pedestrians in the Gaza Strip. Palestinians soon took to the streets throwing stones and violently protesting Israel?s occupation of Gaza and the West Bank. No group was in charge of the intifada though the PLO as well as militant Islamic groups such as Islamic Jihad and Hamas quickly became involved. At root the PLO was nationalist group seeking an independent Palestinian state, whereas the Islamic militants wanted region ? wide Islamic state that would include present-day Israel. ...read more.

Middle

Disagreement over is difficult because there is no easy way ?to split the difference? or divide matters of symbolic importance. For example: very controversial settlements buildings. All the talks have been stopped just because Israel refused to stop building them, even though UN and USA recognize them as illegal. Non-Middle Eastern countries provide belligerents with foreign allies and make regional hostilities part of larger global tensions. During the Cold War, Soviet-US hostility was reflected in Soviet support for Egypt, Syria and Iraq versus US support for Israel and Saudi Arabia. Today, complicating factors include European-American differences, the War on Terrorism, and outsiders? problems in balancing their views on the Palestine question against their need for Middle Eastern oil and their fear of inciting hatred in the Muslim World. Both the Palestinians and Israelis have fragile political systems and are confronted by powerful extremists. Under Arafat the Palestinian Authority was corrupt, authoritarian and inept and was divided among factions. As a result in early 2006 Palestinians gave Hamas a massive electoral victory and a mandate to form a government that must work with Mahmoud Abbas. ...read more.

Conclusion

In some respects, the boundary between Israel and Palestine symbolizes the confrontation of the developed and less-developed worlds. The length of time that the problem has festered and the presence of inflexible leaders and groups make the players more rigid. Only time will tell whether and for how long the cycle of violence will persist. In the end, lasting peace in the region ma not prove possible until one or several major powers physically intervene to separate the foes. In conclusion it can be said that the conflict is very complex and uneasy. Worsened by many factors such as extremists on both sides and right wing governments. Also it is a historical and so long rooted conflict, which was fought by generations before as well as present ones. Finding a solution will be difficult because as one problem will be solved another will occur. This was seen on recent talks, which were so hard to establish, and which failed because of Israeli refusal to stop illegal, recognized as illegal by UN and USA, settlements in the Middle East. Thus it can be said, that there is still a lot of job to be done and no real solution is established. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Middle east section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Middle east essays

  1. Why has it been so difficult to bring peace in the Middle East?

    The invasion actually failed primarily because of the opposition from the United States of America, who decided not to support Britain and France, its reputed allies. Later on Israel was forced to renounce its gains in Gaza and Sinai. This meant that the European forces had to withdraw to Israeli territory.

  2. Can Terrorism Be Stopped?

    "Non-violent action is a generic term covering dozens of specific methods of protest, non-co operation, and intervention, in all of which activists conduct the conflict by doing or refusing to do certain things without using physical violence...It is not and inaction.

  1. The Lebanon Civil War: Syria’s Role in Lebanon

    However, the overall life in the country was disintegrated. Anarchy was ghosted. Political and economy life was out of the authoritie's control, Lebanon's Army too. Finally, as the only solution that was applicable here was deploying of Arabian Peace Corps.

  2. UN and Iraq: The Weakest Coalition

    Not only has UN and US intervention increased the turmoil felt by both religious groups in the country, but it has also had large implications to the region surrounding Iraq. The internal action in Iraq has created problems for other regions surrounding which is a concept known as negative externalities.

  1. Why is it difficult to keep peace talks going in the Middle East?

    However during Roman rule, which culminated in a failed uprising against their imperial masters in 67AD, dispersal or Diaspora occurred where most Jews left the historic homeland Israel and settled all over Europe and the middle East. Although living in widespread communities around the world Jews constantly yearned for the promised land.

  2. Arab-Israeli conflict

    America was the principal superpower that could stop the Israelis attacking the Arabs. The USA was the paymaster of Israel and moderate Arab State and therefore, both the Arabs and the Israelis heavily rely on America. If either side were to get on the wrong side of America, they take the risk of having funding and support taken away.

  1. 'The new Palestinian Revolt',

    use of lethal force by the Israel Defense Force (IDF), clearly suggest that civilians not posing life-threatening danger in the territories were being disproportionately shot at by IDF in a manner that violates the standards for the use of proportional force outlined in the Geneva Conventions."17 The circumstances of Palestinian

  2. Should the West intervene militarily in Syria?

    Additionally, military intervention risks making an already bad situation, worse. Matters are already very delicate with the lives of many at stake and all the talk of attacking Syria might tip-off Assad, resulting in him attacking back, therefore putting more lives on the line.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work