• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why has the Common Agricultural Policy proved so controversial?

Extracts from this document...


European Union - Coursework William Wilson Q. Why has the Common Agricultural Policy proved so controversial? The Treaty of Rome in 1957 outlined a general belief on the part of the six signatories that agricultural policy should be subject to heavy integration. This was due to various reasons and these were outlined in the Rome Treaty. These reasons centered on the establishment of self-sufficiency in agriculture across Europe by creating a minimum level of supply and a stable market which would allow farmers to enjoy relatively good living standards whilst ensuring that prices did not become too high for consumers. European leaders believed that agriculture was a "special case" that could not be left open to the vagaries of the market. Indeed, Robert Jones points out that "the volatility of agricultural markets and the need for security of food supplies has provided a plausible cause for government intervention in the sector" (Jones, 2001, pg210). The final provisions of a common policy were agreed in 1962 and fully implemented by 1968 and the policy quickly became, and remains, the most integrated of all European Union policy areas. As far as agricultural production is concerned, the CAP has been a success as Europe is now completely self-sufficient in food production. ...read more.


Others complain that such stockpiles are costly. This argument may carry some weight as it must be remembered that costs will include paying for storage facilities as well as the means to transport surplus goods to warehouses. The costs of purchasing the food surpluses are also an issue. One of the most prominent goals of CAP was to ensure low prices for consumers. However, it is debatable whether this has been achieved. The CAP costs around fifty billion euros (or roughly about thirty five billion pounds). This money is taken from the EU budget, and as we already know, accounts for around half of it. Since the EU budget results from taxation on member state's citizens it may be fair to suggest that consumers are paying more indirectly for their food. Furthermore, it is difficult to suggest that food prices in Europe are low on a global level. Only once since the establishment of the CAP have average food prices in the rest of the world been lower than in the EU, in 1974 (Jones, 2001, pg218). Admittedly, however, EU households spend just fifteen per cent of household income on food as opposed to fifty eight per cent in Romania or fifty four per cent in Bulgaria (Wallace and Wallace, 2000, pg201). ...read more.


Direct income support for farmers in place of price support mechanisms became more favoured. Farmers would also be rewarded for not growing crops on some parts of their land. This would reduce surpluses by bringing down supply. Although, the EU has made attempts to stand up to criticisms of the CAP it is still viewed with suspicion by many and this criticism is only likely to increase in the next few years. An influx of new members form Eastern Europe which have major agricultural sectors (far and above anything possessed by the existing members) will require more finance which may be unsustainable if the current system remains in place. It is clear that the Common Agricultural Policy is a highly controversial matter for various reasons. The fact that it benefits some states more than others, its lack of relevance to the modern world, the high costs of its operation, the inability to secure low food prices, inequalities in the farming community, international conflicts, fraud, the negative effect on the environment and the likely cost of European expansion have all meant that it is seen by many as a waste of time and resources. It has been that way throughout its existence, despite efforts at reform. We can be certain that CAP will remain controversial in future as it faces up to new problems but it must avoid trying to deal with these with old solutions. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. A clear explanation of key underpinning economic theories relevant to the EU.

    Tariffs, These are taxes on imports of goods and services and this rises the price. By doing this the product or service becomes un-competitive as its costs are high. There is no tariff in the single market that encourages trade and lower prices.

  2. Regulation 2560/2001 on cross-border payments in Europe.

    Economic Policy 19(40), pp.523ff. Hammonds (2004). February Reporter. Retrieved October 18, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://www.hammonds.com/FileServer.aspx?oID=21109 Jansen, C. (1996). Cross-border trade in Europe. Secured Lender. Vol.52, iss.5 Kemppainen, K. (2003). Competition and regulation in European retail payment systems. Retrieved October 18, 2004 from the World Wide Web: http://econwpa.wustl.edu:8089/eps/mic/papers/0404/0404008.pdf Kohler-Koch, B (1999).

  1. The Common Agricultural Policy.

    Since the world prices of foodstuffs tend to be lower than those in the EU, this means a levy is placed on imports equal to the difference between world prices threshold prices. The system works as a form of protection for EU farmers.

  2. An assessement of the impact of the lawyers' establishment directive.

    It is also noteworthy that the perceived obstacles to lawyer migration are not necessarily universal, in that where regional similarities exist in language, culture, or law, statistical trends indicate a greater propensity toward cross-border movement. That is why Belgian and Luxembourg qualified lawyers have been the largest cross-border movers into

  1. International Economics

    Employment and Growth - whether it is good for employment. The Treasury states that this is the fundamental test. There are however three options available to us; 1. To join the single currency, which will mean abandoning the pound and using only the Euro 2.

  2. In 1957 the Common

    (EL Agrai, Ali. M. 2001) The area of support within the EAGGF ensures that farmers have a market for their goods setting prices which allows farmers to have a standard of living equal to that of those working within other sectors of the economy.

  1. Austria - An economic and political overview.

    next election, the EU will have to accept much of the blame. Once again, however, this is not to say that the EU could have done much better. The EU, with the sanctions, has sent out the right message. The problem is that this message was misunderstood, mishandled, and used against the EU by the far right.

  2. EU actorness in relation to Environment policy and Development policy: An evaluation.

    Presence This is the effects and the ability to influence the behaviour of others that the European Union can have by merely existing. This effect is not intended but is born out of reputation. An example of this is the demand for Union membership from Eastern Europe.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work