• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why has the Common Agricultural Policy proved so controversial?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

European Union - Coursework William Wilson Q. Why has the Common Agricultural Policy proved so controversial? The Treaty of Rome in 1957 outlined a general belief on the part of the six signatories that agricultural policy should be subject to heavy integration. This was due to various reasons and these were outlined in the Rome Treaty. These reasons centered on the establishment of self-sufficiency in agriculture across Europe by creating a minimum level of supply and a stable market which would allow farmers to enjoy relatively good living standards whilst ensuring that prices did not become too high for consumers. European leaders believed that agriculture was a "special case" that could not be left open to the vagaries of the market. Indeed, Robert Jones points out that "the volatility of agricultural markets and the need for security of food supplies has provided a plausible cause for government intervention in the sector" (Jones, 2001, pg210). The final provisions of a common policy were agreed in 1962 and fully implemented by 1968 and the policy quickly became, and remains, the most integrated of all European Union policy areas. As far as agricultural production is concerned, the CAP has been a success as Europe is now completely self-sufficient in food production. ...read more.

Middle

Others complain that such stockpiles are costly. This argument may carry some weight as it must be remembered that costs will include paying for storage facilities as well as the means to transport surplus goods to warehouses. The costs of purchasing the food surpluses are also an issue. One of the most prominent goals of CAP was to ensure low prices for consumers. However, it is debatable whether this has been achieved. The CAP costs around fifty billion euros (or roughly about thirty five billion pounds). This money is taken from the EU budget, and as we already know, accounts for around half of it. Since the EU budget results from taxation on member state's citizens it may be fair to suggest that consumers are paying more indirectly for their food. Furthermore, it is difficult to suggest that food prices in Europe are low on a global level. Only once since the establishment of the CAP have average food prices in the rest of the world been lower than in the EU, in 1974 (Jones, 2001, pg218). Admittedly, however, EU households spend just fifteen per cent of household income on food as opposed to fifty eight per cent in Romania or fifty four per cent in Bulgaria (Wallace and Wallace, 2000, pg201). ...read more.

Conclusion

Direct income support for farmers in place of price support mechanisms became more favoured. Farmers would also be rewarded for not growing crops on some parts of their land. This would reduce surpluses by bringing down supply. Although, the EU has made attempts to stand up to criticisms of the CAP it is still viewed with suspicion by many and this criticism is only likely to increase in the next few years. An influx of new members form Eastern Europe which have major agricultural sectors (far and above anything possessed by the existing members) will require more finance which may be unsustainable if the current system remains in place. It is clear that the Common Agricultural Policy is a highly controversial matter for various reasons. The fact that it benefits some states more than others, its lack of relevance to the modern world, the high costs of its operation, the inability to secure low food prices, inequalities in the farming community, international conflicts, fraud, the negative effect on the environment and the likely cost of European expansion have all meant that it is seen by many as a waste of time and resources. It has been that way throughout its existence, despite efforts at reform. We can be certain that CAP will remain controversial in future as it faces up to new problems but it must avoid trying to deal with these with old solutions. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. A clear explanation of key underpinning economic theories relevant to the EU.

    Tariffs, These are taxes on imports of goods and services and this rises the price. By doing this the product or service becomes un-competitive as its costs are high. There is no tariff in the single market that encourages trade and lower prices.

  2. Common Agricultural Policy.

    These post-war developments have led to a change in the relative geographical distribution of FDI: as a result the relative share of FDI going into developing countries fell from around 60 per cent before World War II to around 25 per cent in the 1970s and 1980s.

  1. The Institution of the European Union and Theories.

    The market is very competitive and not balanced, Boots has to decide how they would increase sales in the EU and what type of marketing techniques to use. Evidence of the EU cosmetics market, there are many firms in the EU competing for the cosmetics market and some of these are, Sainsbury, Douglas, Revlon Europe, and Wella.

  2. EU functions

    A "rapid reaction force" has been created by the council so that any major issues and crises that arise they can deal with them immediately and effectively. The final of the 6 tasks council holds is to ensure that EU citizens are free to work and live where they wish through out the EU.

  1. EU actorness in relation to Environment policy and Development policy: An evaluation.

    Presence This is the effects and the ability to influence the behaviour of others that the European Union can have by merely existing. This effect is not intended but is born out of reputation. An example of this is the demand for Union membership from Eastern Europe.

  2. Economic and political integration between the member states of the European Union means that ...

    and customs checks were abolished at most of the EU's internal borders. Free trade means: No barriers (free trade movement), No Quota (No limits on the goods set), No Tariff (No taxes set for the goods), No Exchange Controls (Limiting the liability of the foreign currency).

  1. International Economics

    Pain, N and Young, G., Continent Cut Off? The Macroeconomic Impact of British Withdrawal from the EU, NIESR, February 2000. Republished as, "The macroeconomic impact of UK Withdrawal from the EU", Economic Modelling, 21 (2004), pp. 387-408. They concluded that there was, "no reason to suppose that unemployment would rise significantly if the UK were to withdraw from the EU".

  2. Common Agricultural Policy

    These are set at a level to raise the World market price up to the EU target price. * An internal intervention price is set. If the internal market price falls below the intervention level then the EU will buy up goods to raise the price to the intervention level.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work