• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why is Britain hesitating about membership of EMU and what are the main issues?

Extracts from this document...


International Relations: Why is Britain hesitating about membership of EMU and what are the main issues? On Friday January 1st 1999, "European dreamers finally saw their cherished hope become reality at midnight when 11 countries signed away their sovereignty over monetary policy and the single currency was born".1 However, with the mass jubilation that followed the commencement of the final stage of Economic and Monetary Union within the European Union, there were still some sour notes amid the rhetoric. One included the argument from France that Wim Duisenberg (president of the European Central Bank) should step down in favour of a French president; the other major argument was the claim by Jacques Santer, European Commission president at the time, that Britain's membership of the single currency was inevitable. So why, 4 years later, has this "inevitability" not come into fruition? In order to answer such a question, one must derive first the meaning of EMU. Economic and Monetary Union has been a European ideal for many years. The end of the Second World War heralded the start of a new European surge towards integration. On the one hand, France, left in ruins by occupation from Germany, held a hereditary fear of any further European conflict. As the dust settled, Charles de Gaul emerged as the leader of the Provisional Government of the French Republic. De Gaul was determined to avoid the mistakes of Versailles, and to make sure that such a situation as that of 1939 could never come about again. On the other hand, Germany, overstretched and then destroyed during the Second World War, held out its proverbial hand for Europe to take and lead it out of turmoil. Germany was thus split into 4 provisional sections, each controlled by one of the victorious allied powers (Great Britain; France; USA and the USSR). The UK, under Winston Churchill, was stunned by the shear magnitude of the war, and the fact that for the first time in centuries, British soil had been invaded by an enemy power - the notion of Britain as an Island fortress was undermined. ...read more.


First off, in joining EMU, a state must relinquish its power of control over Monetary Policy. Monetary Policy refers to Supply Sided Economic policy whereby Interest Rates are set to regulate the cost of borrowing to consumers and firms. The Bank of England currently sets interest Rates through its Monetary Policy committee. The committee looks at figures from the previous 3 months, reviews the last 12 months, and examines projected figures for the future year, and thus sets a Rate of Interest that it believes will benefit the economic environment. The Interest Rate set then has two effects: 1) It regulates the cost of borrowing money to Commercial Banks, firms and individuals, thus directly affecting the availability of funds, and indirectly affecting levels of inwards investment and consumption in the economy; 2) It sets the interest incurred on savings, thus either encouraging or discouraging individuals to put money away into high interest accounts for future expenditure. Therefore, Interest Rates are seen as the main Government tool for curbing inflation, as they are used to slow down an over-heating economy, or fuel an economy in recession. Also, the Bank of England can regulate the money supply in the economy through Liquidity Ratios. All Commercial Banks and Building Societies have accounts with the Bank of England, which then sets a Liquidity Ratio, determining how much cash a commercial bank is allowed to make available for investment. Therefore, this again limits the circular flow of income in the economy, and as a direct result of a Keynesian Multiplier effect, can determine the extent of economic growth. The Bank of England also controls the money supply more directly. It decides based on reviews and prospected figures how many notes to print, and how many coins to mint, and thus controls directly the amount of money in the economy. Therefore, the Bank of England is understandably dubious about releasing its grip on monetary policy to a central bank in Brussels. ...read more.


The UK is currently Denmark's third largest supplier with nearly 10% of the market. UK exports to Denmark amounted to �2.7 billion in 2002 and is the UK's 13th most important export market.8 Sweden offers attractive opportunities for UK exporters. Trading links, which go back centuries, are strong and it is the UK's 9th largest and most important export market. The UK's trade in goods with Sweden was �4.19 billion in 2000, second only to Germany as its largest supplier9. Therefore, the fact that these two countries both said no to the proposal of EMU, suggests that the UK might be wise to stay out of it also for the time being. As well as this, since the Iraqi war, a strong link with the United States of America has been formed - more importantly a strong link between Tony Blair and George Bush. To march the UK into EMU at this current time, amidst the international political and social situation between these two countries, might be considered to be ill advised, as Britain tries to grow a prosperous relationship with her Atlantic cousins. In Paradise Lost, John Milton described Hell as containing a furnace, but "from those flames no light, but rather darkness visible". So far the flames of the European debate have shed a remarkable amount of gloom on the subject of the single European Currency, and the EMU. The positive approaches by Tony Blair and Eddie George (Governor of the Bank of England) have helped to dispel some of this fog and kick-start the real discussion. There is no doubt that the Government is in favour of further intervention in Europe, but a degree of hesitancy is understandable from Gordon Brown's position, as perhaps the people of Britain are not yet ready to accept a break with the past and Monetary Subservience to the omnipotent ECB. However, there is a growing fear amongst Economists that Britain should join as soon as possible, or not at all, as the substantial benefits of EMU are withering and eroding as British Politicians debate over the issue. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. Why was the accession of the UK to the EEC in 1972 so politically ...

    In this instance we can see that decisions taken and laws made in Europe supersede that of the British Parliament. For many, this was proof that Sovereignty had been given away to the EU. Every treaty passed by the EU will affect Britain in some way.

  2. The French Revolution

    The King had failed to introduce the potato as an important crop in France and this meant there was even less food in France than in other areas of Europe suffering a famine. Secondly, the previous king had fought many wars for France which cost them a lot of money, and led the country towards bankruptcy.

  1. Why are developing countries unhappy with the global arrangements under the Bretton Woods system?

    The next focus will be on the inequalities associated with the global trading system and the affects of protectionism and the imposition of subsidies on economic growth and development in the developing world. To end off, some ideas in which economic growth can be enticed and entrenched throughout the developing world will be examined.

  2. Why did Britain join the EEC in 1973 and not in 1957?

    Macmillan also had to begin to withdraw from the Commonwealth countries, granting them independence; he did this because the Commonwealth countries were beginning to drain money from Britain, they couldn't create enough trade. Trade with Western Europe increased between 1953-1960, exports to the Common Market rose by 29%, while only at 1% to Sterling countries.

  1. Why did many British colonies demand independence from Britain in the years immediately after ...

    3) The successful setting up of the ECSC led to discussions about further co-operations. The results in 1957 were that the European Economic Community (EEC) the six countries wanted Britain to become a member but the British refused. They still looked on themselves as a world power, rather a European one,

  2. In this essay i will be discussing why many British colonies demanded independence from ...

    By 1963, they realised that their economy was doing very badly compared to those in the EEC. Everyone thought that the EEC wouldn't be very successful but they were surprised when the EEC were economically better off than other countries, which is why Britain eventually joined in 1973.

  1. The Institutional Consequences of Domestic Politics on Africa's International Relations and Regional Cooperation.

    These institutions write Laporte are indispensable for implementing the large and increasing number of conclusions and recommendations formulated at regional levels. It against this background that one should examine the proposed African Union. In doing this, one would first of all be confronted with few basic questions.

  2. The Institution of the European Union and Theories.

    This is one of the major costs for Boots and language can not be standardised so this is one of the disadvantages of being in the market and having to meet different needs as they are costly. Product hair dryer, Boots has to consider many aspects such as plugs as

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work