• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Why is it difficult to keep peace talks going in the Middle East?

Extracts from this document...


Why is it difficult to keep peace talks going in the Middle East? The inability to resolve the land dispute, which began in the late nineteenth century and intensified after the setting up of the Jewish state of Israel in 1948, lies at the heart of the Arab conflict. Reaching a peaceful solution is essentially difficult because the dispute is fraught with many disagreements and lack of trust between and within the Palestinian Arabs and Israeli fractions that remain locked in battle. The Arab basis of the claim is that they conquered the land in 600AD and have lived there ever since. However the Jewish viewpoint is Jews lived there first and that this is their biblical land. This was taken from Jews as a result of a war with the Romans causing Diaspora and they have simply reclaimed the land that was taken from them. Arabs feel if Israel continues to claim the entire land, extending its boundaries then the millions of Arabs in the country would be required to live under Israeli sovereignty but without basic democratic rights. However Israel argues that there has never been an independent State of Palestine. Israel feels that the majority of Palestinians reside today in Jordan on the eastern side of the Jordan River if a Palestinian state was declared on the Western side of Jordan than this would clearly be a second nation for Palestinians. Accordingly Israeli settlements in the West Bank and Gaza do not take away the sovereign rights of any other people. To illustrate loss of sovereign rights the Arabs have highlighted that initially the vast majority of Jews lived outside of Jerusalem but Israel now confers upon those who observe Judaism the right to enter the state as fully enfranchised nationals instantly over anyone else including non-Jews who have lived there for a long time. Jews do not trust the Palestinian political institutions accusing them of corruption and tacit support of terrorism. ...read more.


and also Britain did not want the oil fields to fall into hostile hands. Eager for an ally and support against Turkey they approached the Arabs through their High Commissioner in Cairo, Sir Henry McMahon. A letter written by McMahon on 24th October 1915 to the Sherif of Mecca, clearly stated " Great Britain is prepared to recognise and support the independence of the Arabs in all regions with the limits demanded by the Sherif of Mecca" In November 1917 Arthur Balfour, the British Foreign Minister sent a letter to Lord Rothschild a prominent supporter of Zionism. In the letter Balfour offered government support for "the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people" In fact by the time World War I ended Britain had made 2 different and contradictory proposals : 1) to help the Arabs set up their own states in the Middle East 2) To give Jews their own national home in Palestine. The effect of these proposals meant that neither Jews nor Arabs trusted Britain. Following the 1919 Peace Talks Britain was given the Mandate and hence responsibility for overseeing Palestine and bringing it to self-government. However the Jews fared well during the mandate since the British appointed a Jew Sir Herbert Samuel as High Commissioner of Palestine whose sympathies inevitably lay with the Jews. By the end of 1920 10,000 Jewish immigrants had arrived in Israel since the end of the World War I, they established their own force and the General Federation of Jewish Labour promoting further immigration and settlement. Perhaps by dividing Palestine into Arab and Jewish areas as soon as the mandate was established, Britain could have avoided this conflict. The British were an uncertain government of the Palestinian mandate between the wars and failed to control the violence between Jews and Arabs by the later 1930s which was approaching new heights of ferocity. ...read more.


Even after 1993 when progress was made the UN function's as a supporter and not an inititator. However the UN has won respect from all parties for its work caring for Palestinian refugees. It set ug the UN relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees. In my opinion International efforts today genuinely aim to reach peace but this was not always the case e.g. during the Cold War. Also they were initially not quick enough e.g. had the superpowers or the UN stepped in the moment the fighting started in 1948 decades of turmoil might have been avoided. Consequently it is International interactions (or lack of ) that have served to perpetuate the conflict making it the most enduring in Arab-Israeli history . seemed to have no policy towards Palestine other then trying to contain the violence. Therefore poor handling of the mandate by the British was a major cause of the future Arab-Jewish conflict. Alienated the arabs In the 1950s communist Soviet Union and the democratic capitalist United States were trying to outdo each other in attracting allies around the world. These superpowers were set against each other in the Middle East to deepen and intensify the Arab-Israeli conflict whilst fuelling hostility of the Cold War Arabs do not trust west feel they are supporting Israel and feel their prime interest is in Oil therefore wanting an ally in Israel rather then supporting Palestine. A few countries are biased in the argument. However it non-Muslims countries are now uncertain of Islam. Terrorist attacks have forced distant observers to choose to support. Nature of attacks have made it a religious war there have been over 18000 violent attacks on Israeli targes since September 2000, of which many have been carried out against sites which are holy to the Jewish people or taken place on communal religious occasions these attacks are therefore regarded as an attack on the heritage of the Jewish people- consequently brings religion into the argument. Sabrina Ul-Hasan 10R ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Middle east section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Middle east essays

  1. Explain why the UNO decided to partition Palestine in 1948?

    The Israelis were also driven by the fact that they had just managed to get back their holy land, and gain a national homeland, and were prepared to fight brave and hard to keep it, as they were proud and determined not to let the Arabs take back what they thought was rightfully theirs.

  2. The Arab-Israeli Conflict - Have powers from outside the Middle East helped or hindered ...

    The UN was called upon again and they passed Resolution 242 to try to solve the rising hatred felt between the Arabs and the Jews. I believe the Middle Eastern countries were becoming too reliant on foreign intervention to solve problems that they caused or they were apart of it.

  1. Terrorism. What is terrorism? 2. Why do terrorists ...

    The Palestinian Liberation Front was formed which aimed to return all occupied land back to the Palestinians. This is why there have been many terrorist attacks against Israel. An example is the Munich Massacre of 1972 which took place during the 1972 Olympics when Palestinian terrorists broke into the Israeli

  2. What are the main differences between the beliefs of Palestinian Arabs and Israeli Jews?The ...

    There have been other involvements of other countries and this is an ongoing problem. Another example of this is the Roadmap. This involved the USA, the UN, the EU and Russia. This was a peace plan which covered ongoing preventions of peace such as: extremists and the West Bank.

  1. History Coursework: The Arab-Israeli Conflict

    The conditions in these camps were awful. One British observer describes the conditions, "families huddled bleakly in overcrowded tents. They are without adequate food or sanitation". This was very true. Initially, large families were kept in small tents, and later small huts of concrete and mud were built.

  2. Nationalism in the Middle East

    On the other side, Arab countries felt the need for revenge, and wish to retrieve lost territory, which would mark their actions throughout the rest of the 20th century. Strong feelings of nationalism among the Palestinian residents of the West bank lead to the creation of Palestine whose borders were

  1. British policy towards Palestine in the creation of Israel, one must carefully analyze British ...

    Under the Sykes-Picot Agreement, Palestine was to be administrated by the British. Although it may seem, these "British policies" were not a significant factor in the creation of Israel, as they did not mention Jewish interests or a Jewish state, they were significant in the sense that they were the

  2. Why is there still so much fear, suspicion and hatred between the Israelis and ...

    There have also been certain individuals who have added to the suspicion and mistrust. Yasser Arafat, former leader of the Palestinian Liberation Organisation (PLO) and founder of Fatah, is now President of the Palestinian state. Because of his background many Israelis still regard him as a terrorist and believe that

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work