• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Will examine the effects membership of the European Union or EU has had on the British Constitution and Parliamentary Sovereignty and also the effect membership has had on policies and how the views of the two main political parties have changed

Extracts from this document...


In my essay I will examine the effects membership of the European Union or EU has had on the British Constitution and Parliamentary Sovereignty and also the effect membership has had on policies and how the views of the two main political parties have changed since its inception. The EU was set up as a consequence of the Second World War to establish co-operation and unity throughout Europe. The idea being that if the countries of Europe were more closely integrated, with a mutual dependence on each other, then the threat of war erupting would somehow lessen. Britain joined the EU in 1973. Perhaps the least obvious change membership of the EU has seen is that of the British Constitution. The Constitution is viewed as being flexible. It's unwritten and can be altered as and when required. It sets out a system of government that is unitary and where Parliament is sovereign or supreme to all other governmental institutions. For us to decide whether Parliamentary Sovereignty has been lost since joining the EU, if it indeed ever existed, we must first define what it is. Parliamentary Sovereignty can be divided into three parts:- 1. Parliament can make or unmake any law but only if it does not conflict with EU Regulations or Directives. ...read more.


Members are directly elected MPs or foreign ministers from their own country. (Budge, I, et al 2004, 214) The European Commission's role is to implement the decisions made by the Council of Ministers. The Commission have offices, called Representations in all of the member states of the European Union. In the UK there are offices in London, Edinburgh, Cardiff and Belfast. The European Parliament consists of MEPs directly elected by the people of Europe to represent their interests. Its role is to discuss policies and suggest amendments before finally rubber stamping any new laws. The Parliament also has the power to dismiss the European Commission. The decision-making system of the EU is often seen to be far removed from the people of Europe. The complex jargon and legislation and the fact that there appears to be little accountability creates what is termed a "democratic deficit". This can be countered by what is termed the "subsidiarity principle". This means that EU decisions are taken as close as possible to the citizen. The EU will not take action if it is more effective to do so at national, regional or even local level, except where EU action is solely responsible. In most European countries there is a Ministry for European Affairs that deals with all aspects of the EU. ...read more.


The democratic deficit could be managed better with clearer information concerning Europe filtering through to the man on the street and using the principle of subsidiarity seeing the EU giving more power back to national, regional and local governments in areas where it is not directly concerned. Today the political parties are still divided. The Labour government is taking small tentative steps toward deeper EU integration and sees it as a positive association. The Conservative Party is still sceptical but realise that a fair amount has been gained since joining. Their main concern is that Europe has too much influence over the UK and would like to see some of our sovereignty recouped. Policies are a little clearer but there are still considerable divisions both within and between the main parties. Our future is in Europe and an "ever closer union" with the EU is a good thing for us. We have gained far more than we have lost and I believe that the Labour government is taking tentative steps in the right direction. When the time is right we will join the Euro but only when there are clear economical advantages for us to do so. I believe the question of Parliamentary Sovereignty is a moot point. If indeed it ever existed in the first place, pooling our sovereignty with other member states places us in a stronger position globally. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    ‘The main democratic deficit in the European Union is psychological, not institutional.’ Discuss.

    4 star(s)

    In particular, this theory relates to the areas of monetary and foreign policy where secrecy prevails. In addition, proponents of this theory argue that there is a scarcity of mechanisms to ensure direct accountability to the citizens. The third theory Nugent identified is the organisational process model.

  2. Is there a democratic deficit in the EU? What are its implications and how ...

    In 2002 there was a report which lasted 18 months upon the Constitutional Convention, from which sprung the Treaty. The European Constitutional Treaty looks improve the democratic situation in the institutions and in doing so the EU. The Constitutional Treaty has proposed a new post of a President who will chair the council of ministers.

  1. In view of the limits on the powers of the European Parliament it isoften ...

    This would mean equal powers of co-decision with the council on all legislative matters within the EU. One argument against such a proposal is that although European Parliament speaks for the citizens, the Council speaks for the EU's member states.

  2. Transformation of the U.S. Hegemony in Europe through NATO after the Cold War

    Europe was becoming a way to exert power whereas the Alliance was the designated framework for it19. Another key difference was, related with the autonomous action capacity; the EU would need appropriate structure and assets of its own. U.S. Response to the Challenge and Washington Summit (1999)

  1. Analyse of the effects of price transparency in Europe, with particular reference to the ...

    That's already changing the way car dealerships operate. Car buyers routinely enter the showroom armed with the detailed breakdowns of wholesale auto prices that have been downloaded for free from any of a dozen Web sites. For manufacturers, price transparency means consumers will be better able to infer a product's manufacturing costs, making it much harder to impose large price premiums.

  2. Effectiveness and Democratic Legitimacy: An Investigation of the European Democratic Deficit

    The democratic quality of the EU will now have to be assessed more in terms of the outcomes that the EU produces instead of its democratic accountability. Input Legitimacy Revisited The implications of the previous section should under no

  1. Reasoning behind the European union being set up, and why the UK benefits from ...

    if Britain's voice is less influential in Paris or Bonn, it is likely to be less influential in Washington." Thousands of American firms have based themselves in Britain because we are a member of the EU and therefore a gateway to the European market.

  2. Discuss the view that there is little difference between the basic values of the ...

    Finally, the Conservatives pledge to make the NHS more efficient through managerial reforms. This shows a support for the NHS which is controlled by the government suggesting that the conservatives want to take control over the health sector.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work