• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Wilted Socialist Rose?: Changing fortunes of the French Socialist Party

Extracts from this document...


Wilted Socialist Rose?: Changing fortunes of the French Socialist Party Introduction What's in a name? That which we call a rose By any other name would smell as sweet. - William Shakespeare Jacques Chirac once said that the politics of France would always remain "effervescent". Political volatility is a characteristic feature of French politics (Pierce 1992). That being said, many events that seemed grave and a turning-point for French political parties in the course of history actually turned out to have not such a major impact on their fates. The literature on the Socialist Party (Parti Socialiste or PS) over the years of elections is ripe with predictions of either tremendous success or grave failure. This essay will show that the PS has done well since its official founding, and the converging nature of politics now will result in a 'Third Way' in the policies of the Left and Right, leading to the eventual rise of the PS again. The PS is the biggest party in the left-wing coalition. It was last a majority party in parliament in 1997 under then Prime Minister (PM) Lionel Jospin, and both legislative and presidential powers are now in the hands of Nicolas Sarkozy's Popular Movement Union (Union Mouvement Populaire or UMP) after the April 2007 elections. This essay describes and explains the changing fortunes of the PS under the Fifth Republic in the form of trials faced before 1981, its rule in government from 1981 to 1992, and its gradual improvement after its defeat in 1993. We will look at how the changes in PS' ideologies, policies and alliances over this abovementioned time period affected its development. ...read more.


Mitterrand launched a campaign with the slogan "Changer la vie" in 1977 (RTL 2006) to promote his Socialist domestic program that included nationalization (industries and banks), lower unemployment (create jobs by implementing a 35-hour work week), more welfare (increase minimum wage and social security benefits), and greater redistribution of wealth (lower taxes for low-income groups and higher taxes for companies and the wealthy) (Wells 1981) through increased government spending. As for his foreign policy, Mitterrand realized he needed to embrace Gaullist policy2 in order to gain public support for his 1988 re-election. Luckily, the Gaullist theory of foreign policy where the president holds tight personal power over defense and foreign affairs was flexible and ambiguous enough to be adapted to the PS' political and ideological concerns (Harrison 1984). Mitterrand managed to pass off Socialist decisions as his own idiosyncratic leadership pattern, and fortunately, the PS seemed better representatives of Gaullist principles (Harrison 1984). Furthermore, the Socialists wanted to make world trade "more favorable to developing countries"; the French electorate agreed because they traditionally oppose "a world monetary system dominated by Washington" (Wells 1981). The infamous policy called the Devaquet Reform during the first cohabitation by Chirac's then-party Rally for the Republic (RPR) parliamentary majority in 1986. The reform proposed a restriction on the open access of universities, and an increase in fees to encourage competitiveness in education. This caused a student revolt, general strikes and the accidental death of a student by the police (Bryson 1987). This unpopular neoliberal policy helped to reinforce anti-Americanism, and the poor handling of the situation showed the perils of cohabitation. ...read more.


Lastly, fourth generation immigrants and older were offended at being told that their presence in regional government "risks driving away voters" (Goldhammer 07). The PS wants to capture this electorate but is reluctant to cede power. They need to change their strategies. However, there are still some problems in the PS like internal rivalry, an obsession with the left alliance, and a high abstention rate. They also need to address the problems that caused its defeat in 2002. Even though Hollande has been said to have "forged party unity in the notoriously fractious PS" (Crumley, 2004), in 2005 there were campaigns both for and against the European Treaty within the PS. Finally, the PS needs to replace the 'plural left' coalition with a new alliance strategy, and also needs to mobilize its supporters (Bell 2004). Some promising signs are the "stunning wins" in the regional and European elections, with the Socialist coalition coming in second with 218 out of 785 seats. Conclusion Like Shakespeare's rose, the PS has changed its approach but has remained true to its fundamental value of egalitarianism, a third of the core values of France, even while re-innovating and reconstructing itself. This is important since globalization is taking place at a rapid pace. The PS has already taken steps to embrace neoliberal economic policies. However, it needs to change its programme to be more rigorous and risk-taking in order to lift France out of its economic pit. It also has to change itself from within in order to win elections again; it cannot keep relying on the mistakes of the Right. The Left cannot just keep alternating governments like they have in the past; they have to provide an alternative. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Is Labour Still Socialist Party?

    This can be backed up with the terror legislation been brought in by brown to increase the days to hold someone without charge to 42 in 2008. "New labour" means Blair is trying to change the party and it appears that he is moving away from the old labour.

  2. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the system of choosing presidential candidates.

    Though this opening up the field is good in theory, many would contend experienced politicians are better placed to nominate a presidential candidate than the public. Those selected are not necessarily the best for the job, but merely the lowest common denominator.

  1. Accounts for the changes in voting behaviour in the last 30 years in UK ...

    vote slowly declining; one of the main reasons for this was class de-alignment. There're many factors that are involved with causing class de alignment, changes to the patterns of employment and to the social structure. Sections of the working class, particularly skilled workers in the southern half of the country, became more prosperous.

  2. Assess critically Marx's distinction between ideology and science

    the afternoon, rear cattle in the evening, criticise after dinner, just as I have a mind, without ever becoming hunter, fisherman, herdsman or critic."[17] The road towards such unprecedented liberation lies not through any ingenious ideas, as seen by the Young Hegelians, but through material abundance, impossible in any except the industrial age.

  1. Political Parties, Role and Ideology/Policies Qa (i) Ideology is the core fundamental beliefs ...

    14th and 15th of July, it is clear that lack of trust and confidence in the three main parties is evident. The figures speak for them selves, when questioned about keeping promises 49% of people believe none of them do and 21%, 17% and 18% believe Labour, Conservatives and Liberal Democrats keep their promises respectively.

  2. The rise of the Labour Party had more to do with class consciousness than ...

    There was a strong tendency toward the Liberal traditions of piecemeal reform and compromise within the existing political structure - neither of which indicated a particularly socialist intent. This can be explained in part by the fact that the trade unionists came from a background of negotiation and compromise, leading

  1. Natural Science

    B.C. Ptolemy described the system in detail. Of course, human beings were the centre of God's creation. A Ptolemaic model, a legacy of nearly 2000 years, was also very deeply entrenched in the thinking of the Christian Catholic church. 4. Crisis In his stage an accepted theory fails increasingly to explain anomalous findings - odd bits of

  2. The development of fascist doctrine.

    If this is true, Fascism's doctrine gravitated around a normic conception of man and society which Fascist theoreticians themselves variously charecterized as "organic", "solidaristic", or "communalistic" in order to distinguish it from the liberal coception to which Fascism was intransigently opposed.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work