• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Wilted Socialist Rose?: Changing fortunes of the French Socialist Party

Extracts from this document...


Wilted Socialist Rose?: Changing fortunes of the French Socialist Party Introduction What's in a name? That which we call a rose By any other name would smell as sweet. - William Shakespeare Jacques Chirac once said that the politics of France would always remain "effervescent". Political volatility is a characteristic feature of French politics (Pierce 1992). That being said, many events that seemed grave and a turning-point for French political parties in the course of history actually turned out to have not such a major impact on their fates. The literature on the Socialist Party (Parti Socialiste or PS) over the years of elections is ripe with predictions of either tremendous success or grave failure. This essay will show that the PS has done well since its official founding, and the converging nature of politics now will result in a 'Third Way' in the policies of the Left and Right, leading to the eventual rise of the PS again. The PS is the biggest party in the left-wing coalition. It was last a majority party in parliament in 1997 under then Prime Minister (PM) Lionel Jospin, and both legislative and presidential powers are now in the hands of Nicolas Sarkozy's Popular Movement Union (Union Mouvement Populaire or UMP) after the April 2007 elections. This essay describes and explains the changing fortunes of the PS under the Fifth Republic in the form of trials faced before 1981, its rule in government from 1981 to 1992, and its gradual improvement after its defeat in 1993. We will look at how the changes in PS' ideologies, policies and alliances over this abovementioned time period affected its development. ...read more.


Mitterrand launched a campaign with the slogan "Changer la vie" in 1977 (RTL 2006) to promote his Socialist domestic program that included nationalization (industries and banks), lower unemployment (create jobs by implementing a 35-hour work week), more welfare (increase minimum wage and social security benefits), and greater redistribution of wealth (lower taxes for low-income groups and higher taxes for companies and the wealthy) (Wells 1981) through increased government spending. As for his foreign policy, Mitterrand realized he needed to embrace Gaullist policy2 in order to gain public support for his 1988 re-election. Luckily, the Gaullist theory of foreign policy where the president holds tight personal power over defense and foreign affairs was flexible and ambiguous enough to be adapted to the PS' political and ideological concerns (Harrison 1984). Mitterrand managed to pass off Socialist decisions as his own idiosyncratic leadership pattern, and fortunately, the PS seemed better representatives of Gaullist principles (Harrison 1984). Furthermore, the Socialists wanted to make world trade "more favorable to developing countries"; the French electorate agreed because they traditionally oppose "a world monetary system dominated by Washington" (Wells 1981). The infamous policy called the Devaquet Reform during the first cohabitation by Chirac's then-party Rally for the Republic (RPR) parliamentary majority in 1986. The reform proposed a restriction on the open access of universities, and an increase in fees to encourage competitiveness in education. This caused a student revolt, general strikes and the accidental death of a student by the police (Bryson 1987). This unpopular neoliberal policy helped to reinforce anti-Americanism, and the poor handling of the situation showed the perils of cohabitation. ...read more.


Lastly, fourth generation immigrants and older were offended at being told that their presence in regional government "risks driving away voters" (Goldhammer 07). The PS wants to capture this electorate but is reluctant to cede power. They need to change their strategies. However, there are still some problems in the PS like internal rivalry, an obsession with the left alliance, and a high abstention rate. They also need to address the problems that caused its defeat in 2002. Even though Hollande has been said to have "forged party unity in the notoriously fractious PS" (Crumley, 2004), in 2005 there were campaigns both for and against the European Treaty within the PS. Finally, the PS needs to replace the 'plural left' coalition with a new alliance strategy, and also needs to mobilize its supporters (Bell 2004). Some promising signs are the "stunning wins" in the regional and European elections, with the Socialist coalition coming in second with 218 out of 785 seats. Conclusion Like Shakespeare's rose, the PS has changed its approach but has remained true to its fundamental value of egalitarianism, a third of the core values of France, even while re-innovating and reconstructing itself. This is important since globalization is taking place at a rapid pace. The PS has already taken steps to embrace neoliberal economic policies. However, it needs to change its programme to be more rigorous and risk-taking in order to lift France out of its economic pit. It also has to change itself from within in order to win elections again; it cannot keep relying on the mistakes of the Right. The Left cannot just keep alternating governments like they have in the past; they have to provide an alternative. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Accounts for the changes in voting behaviour in the last 30 years in UK ...

    There was a decline in those who identified with the working class, mirroring the decline in the 'traditional' working class, employed in the old 'staple' industries, such as coal, engineering, shipbuilding etc., with a parallel rise in the 'new' working class, employed in modern, high-tech and service industries.

  2. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    Central governments need regional or local governments. A single policy may require the coordination and collaboration of different governmental bodies, many of which are in competition or conflict with each other. And, as I noted earlier, successful goal achievement may in part also lie in the hands of political parties and interest groups.

  1. Political Parties, Role and Ideology/Policies Qa (i) Ideology is the core fundamental beliefs ...

    14th and 15th of July, it is clear that lack of trust and confidence in the three main parties is evident. The figures speak for them selves, when questioned about keeping promises 49% of people believe none of them do and 21%, 17% and 18% believe Labour, Conservatives and Liberal Democrats keep their promises respectively.

  2. Is Labour Still Socialist Party?

    This can be backed up with the terror legislation been brought in by brown to increase the days to hold someone without charge to 42 in 2008. "New labour" means Blair is trying to change the party and it appears that he is moving away from the old labour.

  1. How have political sociologist understood globalization? Globalization is perhaps the central concept of ...

    but it also tends to serve as a convenient ideological cloak for terrible wars waged by political blocs no less self-interested than the traditional nation state. For these critics, the fact that the recent Allied war against Iraq, conducted as a so-called "humanitarian intervention", probably resulted in at least several

  2. Why was the Dreyfus Affair so bitterly divisive in France? The Dreyfus Affair began ...

    The right were joined in one belief, that Dreyfus was guilty and deserved to be imprisoned. The opponents to this belief were Dreyfusards. This group was consisted mainly of Radicals, Republicans and Socialists. The Socialists, who had previously disagreed with the Republicans and Radicals, became unified with them.

  1. To what extent do recent elections in the UK and the USA support the ...

    The dealignment thesis will always suffer from being inconclusive based on only a portion of the available data. Though it is worth remembering that a major factor in falling turnout is the lack of any kind of identification with the candidates.

  2. The development of fascist doctrine.

    Gentilean idealists, nationalists, and national syndicalists all accepted a common core of doctrinal elements- and by 1921 Mussolini himself had introduced Gentile's conception of the stato etico into Fascist doctrine. The differences that obtained were the consequence of the evident sociological biases of nationalism and national syndicalism.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work