• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12

A study investigating the effects of categorisation on recall

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

A study investigating the effects of categorisation on recall 1. Introduction Background research The cognitive approach to psychology studies the processes the mind uses to deal with information and looks at areas such as language, learning, perception and memory. Cognitive psychologists commonly use models to explain information flow. These models are abstract ways of representing how the mind deals with information rather than defining separate areas of the brain for each aspect of memory. The information processing model uses the analogy of a computer system - information is received and processed in various ways by the mind before being passed into memory. Within the study of memory, there are three main processes: Encoding > Storage > Retrieval Encoding is the process of perceiving and understanding input. Storage is the way in which we commit information to memory. Retrieval is the process used to access information that is not currently in conscious memory. William James, an early psychologist, identified two types of memory - "primary memory" and "secondary memory", which are now called "short term memory" and "long term memory". Atkinson and Shiffrin's "multi-store model of memory" This theory states that there are three distinct memory stores - sensory, short term and long term. The amount of attention paid and "rehearsal" of information affects likelihood of this information passing first into short term and then into long-term memory. Sensory memory has a very limited duration of around a second for visual store and 2 seconds for the acoustic store. Only information attended to is passed into short term memory - we would be swamped by sensory information otherwise. ...read more.

Middle

3. Results Table 1 - Summary table of results Categorised Uncategorised Total 248 165 Mean 12.4 8.25 Median 12 8.5 Mode 12 9 Range 7 4 Summary table commentary A significant difference was found between the total number of words recalled in the categorised and uncategorised conditions. The words recalled from the categorised list exceed those recalled from the uncategorised list by a ratio of 3:2. There is also a corresponding difference in the mean scores between the two conditions, although the mean is subject to influence by unusually high or low scores and can give a distorted picture of central tendency. The median is less likely to be affected by extremely high or low scores and presents a more accurate overview of the central tendency of participant's scores. However the two totals still have a ratio of 3:2. The mode is not a particularly useful measure in this study. In the categorised condition the most common value of recall is 12, which is significantly higher than the 9 in the uncategorised conditions. The range is greater for the categorised condition than the uncategorised condition. This is to be expected given the totals. Additional graphical description of results Fig 1. Mean number of words recalled Fig 2. Median number of words recalled Fig 3. Mode number of words recalled Descriptive statistics commentary Similar points to those made above can be made regarding figures 1/2/3. However the bar charts do show in a more obvious, dramatic fashion the extent of the differences in the scores between the two conditions. In all cases it may be seen that there is a significant increase in words recalled from the categorised word list compared to the uncategorised word list. ...read more.

Conclusion

The categorisation of the information gives the participant a cue to aid recall. Tulving and Pearlstone provided the category headings in one of the conditions of their study, which further increased recall. Category headings were not provided on the answer sheet in this study, but participants commented on the groups of words when recalling and it appears that the participants were using the category headings as cues to help recall. Semantic errors were made on the answer sheets such as putting "hifi" instead of "stereo". The participant knew the general form or function of the item they were trying to recall, but used the wrong name to label it. These errors support the Atkinson and Shiffrin model of memory and the theory that long term memory stores information in a semantic format. Generalisation of findings The findings of this study can only be generalised to the target population - in this case the friends and family of the experimenter. This is culture bound, biased and very narrow, so generalisation to people beyond those who took part is likely to be inaccurate as the target population is not representative of the wider population. Application of study to everyday life Using mnemonics to help remember otherwise unconnected information is a practical and effective use of Miller's "chunking" in day to day life. Creating a mnemonic such as "every good boy deserves fudge" to remember the musical notes EGBDF turns a collection of letters into a distinctive, easy to remember sentence. Organising information in a "mind map" or "spider diagram" is another effective way of increasing the quantity of information recalled. These diagrams involve the "chunking" of ideas and information into groups and hierarchies. This has applications in academic and work related situations where large amounts of data need to be recalled. 5. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To retain recall, which is more beneficial, rote rehearsal or imagery?

    4 star(s)

    This is where both the control group, and the experimental group receive their instructions in the same way. Participants The subjects taking part within this experiment are people within the residential area of Helston town (Cornwall); they are also representing a small equivalent of the population by taking part in this study.

  2. SHORT TERM MEMORY

    Same target population was used, and a small sample size of participants was used when conducting this experiment, so the experiment cannot be generalised. If the investigation was to be made better for a 2nd attempt it would be given some thought to how different distractions affect memory recall.

  1. Investigate the effects of Imagery on Memory recall: Visual Aid & Memory Recall

    The null hypothesis is there will be no difference in condition 1 (involving grid of random words supported by images) and condition 2 (only consisting of random words); this difference is due to chance factors alone. The level of significance for this study is 5% (0.05)

  2. Recall in Memory Using Mnemonics

    and some remembering the first 3 words (primacy effect). This experiment had an unrepresentative sample - only participants aged 16-18 were used and all were from similar educational backgrounds. The experiment could be improved by using a few different methods.

  1. Memory.This experiment studies the effects that organised and unorganised lists have on the performance ...

    Design Participants were chosen through opportunity sampling, with an equal number of males to females, aged between 15 and 65. The lists were constructed by choosing 12 different countries that the experimenters had visited, and twelve countries that they would like to visit in the future.

  2. "An experiment to see the effect of chunking on short-term memory recall".

    This is why I will be counter balancing. This is when you split the participants into two groups so that half the participants complete Test A and then do Test B, while the other half do Test B and then Test A.

  1. Investigating the short-term memory

    far from reliable because it's not close to the mean average calculated. Predictive hypothesis supports the fact that when a distraction is added to group 2's experiment, their result would be affected in some way. The result derived from the experiment supports the predictive hypothesis as the distraction did affect

  2. Does chunking help with memory?

    * Dependant variable The dependant variable is what is affected by the independent variable, it is also measurable. This is how successfully people remember. I can measure the dependent variable by recording how many words are recalled. *The two lists contain the same words, Universal words were chosen for the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work