• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  22. 22

An experiment to investigate the effect of interference on memory recall

Extracts from this document...


TITLE: An experiment to investigate the effect interference has on Memory Recall. Alice Foster Coursework Aim: To determine the effect that interference will have on Memory recall. Hypothesis: Interference will cause an effect on memory recall. IV: Interference DV: Successful Memory Recall Introduction What is memory? Cara Flanagan (97) gives the following definitions of memory, * The mental function of retaining data i.e. learning. * The storage system which holds the data. * The data that is retained. We use our memory all the time without even realising it. We remember how to read, write, open doors, shut doors etc, for normal every day things. In order for us to remember information, memory goes through 3 stages: * Encoding * Storage * Retrieval Encoding is how we store information into our memories and can be done in 3 forms: - * Visual - You see the image you are trying to recall * Acoustic - You hear the information in your mind * Semantic - You understand and remember the meaning of information stored Storage is the information that we have encoded, in our minds, until we need it. Retrieval is when we use the information that we have encoded and stored. There are 3 main theories to explain Memory. Richard Atkinson and Richard Shiffrin (1968) proposed the Multi-Store Model. They suggested that memory was a series of processes. Sensory memory is where information is stored for a few seconds, until it is encoded. If information is not encoded it will fade from the sensory memory. ...read more.


* The researcher will thank everyone for taking part and will debrief everyone after the experiment is complete. PARTICPANTS: As the researcher was carrying out the experiment during a band rehearsal, it was more convenient to use opportunity sampling as participants were easily accessible as they all belonged to the band. "Anyone who is available, and agrees to take part in research can become a participant." (B Woods 2004) This type of sampling was economical and very quick. In order to have a bigger and more accurate representative of the population, Random Sampling may have been used, but opportunity sampling proved to be more appropriate to this experiment. 10 adults participated in this experiment. MATERIALS: Cue cards for the researcher Two lists of fifteen words Twenty sheets of A4 paper Ten pens A radio A mobile phone Notes on Debriefing A stopwatch An assistant to help with interference (As previously arranged) PROCEDURE: Before the experiment began, the researcher set up the room by spacing 10 single desks around the room and placing an A4 page and pen on each desk. The experiment was carried out in a separate room, in the same building of the band rehearsal. When everyone was seated, the researcher thanked everyone for agreeing to take part in the experiment. The researcher also reminded everyone that they were free to leave at anytime. The researcher then read out a list of standardised instructions. The researcher asked the participants if they wanted these instructions read out again. The participants agreed that this was not necessary. ...read more.


This can also be known as the Serial Position effect. Evaluation The participants responded well to the study. The researcher had everything set up and planned out in advance which helped the experiment to go smoothly. The participants all understood the instructions but unfortunately some participants did begin to make up words when they couldn't remember anymore, even though the researcher did emphasise that it was not a 'race or competition'. As the researcher mentioned previously, it may have been better to have used random sampling in order to give a more accurate representative of the population. But this was not possible due to time restraints. It may have been interesting to have carried out this experiment again by giving participants the words to see when learning. This may have changed results as participants would have been encoding the information visually as opposed to acoustically. The results could have been hampered due to nerves as participant would not know what this experiment is for until debriefing. Conclusion This experiment supported the Hypothesis that was Interference will cause an effect on memory recall. As only a small sample was used, the researcher would not be confident about generalising the results although the researcher's results were consistent with theories and other studies. The only problem the researcher found was that participants were extremely nervous before they began. When they began condition B, the participants may have relaxed or possible guessed what the experiment was for therefore could bias the results. The researcher learned through further reading for this study the importance and vast affect that rehearsal and interference may have on Memory recall. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Investigate into the Primacy and Recency effect

    The participants were then given a blank sheet of paper. The participants were told that they had exactly one minute to write down as many words from the list that they could remember. The paper was then collected by one of the experimenters 5.

  2. Primacy and Recency effect

    remember the first few words known as the primary effect and the last few words which are known as the recency effect. Glanzer and Cunitz theory (1966) also supports the multi store model, which shows that the participants remember the first few words, which is due to rehearsal and the

  1. Cue dependent Forgetting. This experiment investigates Tulvings theory of cue dependent forgetting, with ...

    The randomness of the list of words given in this experiment is another undesired confounding variable as the words have variety of characteristics among themselves, the complexity of words include being plural/singular (students seem to make more mistakes on forgetting a particular word being plural, which still counted as wrong

  2. The Stroop Effect

    Standardised instructions (see appendix 2) Score sheet for researcher (see appendix 3) Results Table showing the mean and standard deviation of the consistent and inconsistent lists Inconsistent List Consistent List Mean 11.615 6.365 Standard Deviation 2.631144 1.321632 The above results show a clear distinction in the time taken between the consistent and inconsistent list; the

  1. Carry out an experiment on participants to investigate proactive interference on memory recall, using ...

    There are many different theories and approaches to psychology, the scientific study of behaviour and experience. One example is the cognitive approach, and this is concerned with the internal mental processes, and it's interest lies between S-R, (stimulus and response), this came as a reaction to the behaviourists disregard for

  2. Memory: Rote Rehearsal and Mental Imagery.

    This was like a distracter task. Then the participants were asked to write as many words from their list as they could with no regard to the order, spelling or time. (See appendix). Each group consisted of ten males, and ten female and all participants were aged between 16-18 as

  1. Investigating the short-term memory

    This consent form was given out to participants to read and decide if they want to participate in the investigation, because they've got the right to make any objection at any time. And it explains what the participants will be agreeing to, if they give us their consent to participate.

  2. Evaluate 3 Approaches to treating Mental Disorders: Psychodynamic, Biological and Behavioural Approach.

    The most unusual part of the treatment involves the therapist waving his or her fingers back and forth in front of the client's eyes, and the client tracking the movements while focusing on a traumatic event. The act of tracking while concentrating seems to allow a different level of processing to occur.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work