• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17

An experiment to investigation the effect of sorting words by their meaning and sorting words by their font style on the number of words correctly recalled.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Title An experiment to investigation the effect of sorting words by their meaning and sorting words by their font style on the number of words correctly recalled. Contents Page Abstract 3 Introduction 3 - 4 Method 4 - 5 Design 4 Participants 4 Materials and Apparatus 4 Task 5 Procedure 5 Ethical Issues 5 Results 6 Summary of data 6 Discussion 6 - 7 Conclusion 7 References 7 Appendices 7 - 11 Appendix 1 8 Appendix 2 9 Appendix 3 10 Appendix 4 10 Appendix 5 11 Abstract This investigation is based on Craik and Tulvig's research (1975) into Craik and Lockhart's (1972) "Levels of Processing" theory. They asked participants questions about either the meaning, sound of appearance of a list of 60 words and they found that participants correctly recognised more of the words in the 'meaning' condition than in the 'sound' or 'appearance' condition put together. The aim of this study was to investigate whether words sorted by their meaning are better recalled, than the same words sorted by their appearance. The experimental hypothesis was "The participants who sort the words according to the meaning of the word will recall significantly more words than the participants who sort the words according to font style." The research method chosen was a field experiment using an independent groups design, where one group had to sort the words by their meaning and the other group had to sort the words by their font style. The target population was Y9 King Ecgbert School students in Sheffield, they were selected by opportunity sampling, and there were 10 participants in each group. Participants who sorted the words according to the font-style correctly recalled a mean number of 1.9 words, whereas the participants who sorted the words according to their meaning correctly recalled a mean number of 8.2. The experimental hypothesis was accepted and the researcher concluded that the amount of information correctly recalled can be increased if the level at which the information is processed is increased. ...read more.

Middle

* A set of 20 cards were made on the computer by the researcher. The cards were designed so that each one had a different word typed on it and they were all written in black text, size 18 so that the words were clear and there was no chance of participant mistaking handwriting. 5 of the 20 words were written in font Bauhaus 93, 5 in Curlz MT, 5 in Lucida Handwriting, and the other 5 in Poor Richard, for the participants in condition 1 to sort the words by font style. 5 of the words were fruits, 5 cities, 5 occupations and the other 5 colours, for the participants in condition 2 to sort the words by the meaning of the word. I decided to use these specific words because they are all common words that I felt would be familiar to the students and so decrease the risk of participants not being able to recall words because they did not know them. * A stop-clock was used by the researcher in order to accurately keep time limits on the participants sorting and recall times. * 20 pieces of lined paper and pens were used for the participants to record the words that they could recall. On 10 of these pieces of paper the researcher had written the number "1", to give to the participants in condition 1 and on the other 10 pieces of paper the researcher had written the number "2", to give to the participants in condition 2. The 20 words and the pieces of paper with "1" and "2" on are available in the appendix. Task The basic task of the experiment was for the participants to sort a set of 20 words into four categories, each category containing five words, in 60 seconds. Participants in condition 1 had to sort the words by font style and participants in condition 2 had to sort the words by meaning of the word. ...read more.

Conclusion

One limitation of this experiment was that the participants were selected through opportunity sampling so the participants were not a very good representative sample of the entire population and researcher bias could have had an influence (e.g. the researcher could have selected participants that they thought would provide them with the best results). To improve the experiment the researcher could use quota sampling by researching the percentage of males and females in the target population and then select a sample of participants for the experiment that contains the number of males and females that is proportional to the target population. This would mean the sample better represents the entire population. An idea for further research would be to ask half of the participants to place the words into complex sentences e.g. "Any good (Photographer) will tell that in order to capture the perfect photograph you need to have good lighting". And to ask the other half of the participants to place the words into simple sentences e.g. A "Photographer" takes photographs, to investigate whether further increasing the depth of processing, further increases the number of words recalled. This will make the experiment more realistic, since students are more likely to read and write sentences, rather than simply sorting words, so this will increase the ecological validity. In everyday life, we often have to process information that we need to remember later, and we often remember this information if it means something to us. Therefore, the results of this experiment do relate to real life because we often try to remember information by linking it with information that we already know. However, we must remember that we can forget information, even if we believe that it has been deeply processed because it is simply not immediately accessible for recall. Conclusion This experiment shows that information that we process deeply is better stored in the memory and so more likely to be remembered correctly, than information that is processed shallowly. This is known as the Levels of Processing, (Craik and Lockhart, 1972). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Craik and Lockhart believed that depth is a critical concept for levels of processing ...

    4 star(s)

    in memory: the route you take to get home, what your primary school used to look like, the names of what people you know etc.... There is probably some limit to how many brain cells you can use but it seems likely that we never reach this upper limit in long term memory.

  2. Primacy and Recency effect

    As from this experiment 20 participants were used so if this experiment was to be done again the participants used would be increased to 40. It will increase reliability significantly and give more generalisability to the target population. Then again, the number of subjects participating is and extraneous variable as it is difficult to determine how many will show voluntarily.

  1. Images are recalled better than words

    were synonyms (different words with same/similar meaning, for example: talk and speak).Thirdly some of the probe words used were identical to the ones on the original stimulus list. Similar numbers of errors of recall from the stimulus list was made for homonym and synonym probes.

  2. Stroop Effect

    Sample: The researcher was made sure that adequate knowledge was required to replicate Stroops original study. A 17 year old male was the researcher. Ten participants were selected in total with specific ages between 14-18 years and 20-35. Opportunity sample was used.

  1. The Stroop Effect

    For this research 20 participants were used; 12 of these were boys while 8 were girls Procedure The researcher printed off six colour lists; three inconsistent and three consistent with the words. They then printed off the "answers" to the word list (to ensure the participant is saying the correct colours).

  2. Carry out an experiment on participants to investigate proactive interference on memory recall, using ...

    Also, less participants were needed which in the circumstances of this experiment was beneficial. The independent variable is the technique used, and the dependent variable is the results produced. In this experiment the independent variable is that in the second condition, condition 1 attempts to cause proactive interference.

  1. Will participants have a better recall of words when they are presented in an ...

    They also carried out the same experiment but with organised lists of words. Again recall was greater in the groups that had been asked to impose their own organisation on the lists suggesting that recall will be greater when the learner has some input into the organisation of the material.

  2. Evaluate 3 Approaches to treating Mental Disorders: Psychodynamic, Biological and Behavioural Approach.

    They include chlorpromazine (Thorazine), thioridazine (Mellaril) and haloperidol (Haldol) and usually begin to take effect a few days after they are administered. Antipsychotic drugs reduce sensitivity to irrelevant stimuli by limiting the activity of the neurotransmitter dopamine. Many antipsychotic drugs are most useful for treating positive symptoms of schizophrenia, such as hallucinations and delusions.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work