• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"An experiment to see the effect of chunking on short-term memory recall".

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Psychology Coursework Introduction "An experiment to see the effect of chunking on short-term memory recall". Many psychologists studying memory suggest that there are different stages through which information must travel if it is to be remembered. According to Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968) there are three kinds of memory storage and these vary according to their function and the length of time information is retained. Sensory memory is the first storage. This refers to the initial momentary storage of information, which lasts only a short time. It is recorded by the persons sensory system as a raw non-meaningful stimulus. Short-term memory is the next storage. This can last from around 5 to 15 seconds. The difference between this stage and the sensory stage is that here the information is stored in terms of its meaning rather than as mere sensory stimulation. Repetitive rehearsal would retain the information in short-term memory for longer. The third type of storage is long-term memory. Here information is relatively permanent although it may be difficult to retrieve. Continual rehearsal would be needed here if the information were to be stored for a long time. However, it is said that sometimes the brain does not forget certain things such as a language; even without rehearsal people seem to remember languages for long periods of time. For this coursework I am going to be concentrating on short-term memory, i.e. the effects of chunking on short-term memory recall. Chunking refers to a process by which information committed to memory is restructured. The term was first used by George Miller in a famous 1956 review paper entitled " The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. " Miller discussed a memory span experiment conducted by S. Smith. Smith, measured the span of immediate memory for strings of binary digits (e.g. 110010110) and found the span to be about the same as for decimal digits. ...read more.

Middle

When told to stop memorising, turn the paper over and straight away start recalling as much as you can. You will have 30 seconds to do this and then be told to stop. Stop straight away, turn your papers over and put your pens down." After these instructions were given I asked all the participants if they understood the instructions clearly so as to avoid confusion. I then started the experiment. After the first test was done and the results were collected in I repeated the procedure explaining that they should repeat what they did with a different word list. The word list firstly given to one group was given to the other and vice versus. The papers were then collected in and the students were debriefed on what they were tested on and what we were looking for. This debrief consisted of "This experiment was testing short-term memory and the effects of chunking. You were tested on, un-chunked words, and chunked words. Thank you for taking part" After this they were asked a series of questions to help reduce the number of participant variables. Did you have any breakfast this morning? Has anyone had a late night and feel they didn't get enough sleep? Did anyone drink any caffeine? Controls Situational controls These were controlled so that nothing distracts the participants or affects the results. A "Do Not Enter" sign was placed on the door to make sure that no ones entered the room and interrupts the experiment. The experiment was done in the middle of the day. This makes sure that the participants are alert and capable of doing the test. This also ensured that the amount of light in the room is sufficient to read the data. The door will be shut during the experiment as to keep out as much noise as possible, and the room used was detached from the building so there was less noise from the other students. ...read more.

Conclusion

This is shown in the results as the results range from six to nine letters or numbers remembered. Miller also said that the amount of information that can be retained in the short-term memory can be increased through chunking and this is shown in my experiment because in Test A some people remembered up to all 10 chunks of information when they were chunked. I also discussed in the background research how Herbert Simon found that if he presented himself with a list of words and found he could not recall them properly after just one presentation unless they were chunked. This is also shown in my experiment because due to chunking the participants found it increasingly easier to remember the chunked words compared to the un-chunked words. De Groot also found that chunking affects the short term memory when related to chess players. I believe this can be related to my experiment because Generalisation Of Findings The experiment was done on a very small age group from 16-18 so it would be hard to generalise to younger children and also to adults or elderly people. This is because the results may vary depending on the age range. The participants were from different ethnicities and genders so you can generalise to them. This means that the results cannot be generalised to the larger population. Application of Study to Everyday Life You can apply this study to everyday life situations. For example if you looked up a phone number in the telephone book and you didn't have a pen so you had to remember it long enough to type it into the phone, you might chunk the numbers together to make it easier to remember. This would be chunking. Another example in a real life situation would be that sometimes people have trouble remembering how to spell words so they chunk the words together to make it easier to remember. For example, to spell 'altogether' you could chunk it into four words. 'All', 'to', 'get', 'her'. This would be another example of chunking. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The Memory Process. This paper will describe a memory test using numbers, letters, and ...

    3 star(s)

    I was able to recall 11 letters consecutively. When I attempted the next level and failed, it dropped back down a level. Consequently, each time I inaccurately recalled the series of letters, I had to drop down one level. As a result, after reaching 11 letters and again failed at 12.

  2. The Effect Chunking of Numbers has on Short-Term Memory Recall.

    He found that while the sizes of chunks vary accordingly to players' expertise, the average number of chunks that they could hold was 3 to 4. Rationale Past studies have shown results that chunking has improved memory recall. However, previous experiments tend to focus on organised information, which had meaning

  1. An experiment to investigate the effect of interference on memory recall

    It talks about 3 different levels of processing - * Structural level (Appearance) * Phonetic level (Sound) * Semantic level (Meaning) Craik and Lockhart (1972) tested this and found that there was more information processed at semantic level than acoustic level and that information processed at structural level was remembered least.

  2. The Stroop Effect

    This shows that the supervisory attentional system that Norman and Schallice identified does not always work; when people open the schema to identify and say the colour words contention scheduling does not stop the schema to read and say what the word says.

  1. Carry out an experiment on participants to investigate proactive interference on memory recall, using ...

    Word frequency was a possible extraneous variable. More common words trigger a stronger memory recall. For the experiment 80 words were randomly selected by the experimenter from their mind. Then to eliminate these being linked in a familiar story (for instance if the experimenter said 'dog', it is quite likely the next word to come to mind

  2. Investigating the short-term memory

    paying the required attention to the information we are meant to remember, therefore causing us to lose & forget the information. Brown & Peterson (1956) also proposed this idea. In their research, participants heard various tri grams. Immediately after, they were instructed to recall what they just heard, and to count backwards in 3 straight afterwards.

  1. Stroop Effect

    After they completed their time was recorded for both lists. In order for the experiment to be significant and valid, a Wilcoxon Matched Pairs Sign Rank Test was used with all the raw data to see if the results support the hypothesis and whether the data is significant.

  2. The Effects of Chunking and Distraction on Short Term Memory Recall

    One of the main ways to assess this has been to impose a distraction technique during or after the items which are to be memorized. For example Wolach and Pratt (2000) studied the effects of both phonological and noise ditracters on short term momory recall and showed that both distracters negatively affected the memorization process.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work