• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

An experiment to support the assumption that there are two distinct memory stores in the multi store model of memory as propos

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

An experiment to support the assumption that there are two distinct memory stores in the multi store model of memory as proposed by Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968). Candidate's Name: Samantha Aloysius Candidate's Number: Instructor's Name: Sarah Carter School: United World College of South East Asia Subject: Psychology, Standard Level Date of Submission: 23.03.07 Word Count: 1422 Abstract This experiment was conducted in order to gather evidence to support the assumption made by Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968) that there are two distinct memory stores in the multi store model. Two groups of students from an international school in Singapore took part in this experiment. The aim was to see how well participants were able to recall the words in a list and if the position of the words affected their ability to recall the words. The obtained results show that most participants tend to recall the first and last words in the list better than the words in the middle of the list and this is similar to the results obtained from Glanzer and Cunitz (1968) in the free recall experiment that they conducted. Contents Abstract...................................................................i Contents..................................................................1 Introduction...............................................................2 Method....................................................................3 Design............................................................3 Participants......................................................3 Apparatus.........................................................3 Procedure..........................................................4 Results.....................................................................4 Discussion..................................................................6 References..................................................................7 Appendices.................................................................8 Appendix i.........................................................8 Appendix ii........................................................8 Appendix iii.......................................................9 Appendix iv.......................................................10 Appendix v........................................................11 Appendix vi.......................................................12 Appendix vii......................................................12 Introduction Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968) ...read more.

Middle

This was done by putting the words in the middle portion at the beginning and ends of the list, and vice versa. By doing this, we were able to find out if the way the two groups recall the list was similar to the serial position curve regardless of the way the words were positioned. If both the graphs of the groups show similar patterns to the serial position curve, then that would prove that the primary and recency effect is reliable. Ethical guidelines that have been taken into account: * All participants were informed before commencing the experimental study that they could withdraw at any time. * Participants were informed of the aims and objectives of the research. * Participants were debriefed at the end of the experiment. * Anonymity for each participant was guaranteed and all data collected was kept confidential. Participants Two groups of participants were used and chosen using opportunity sampling because it was more convenient as there were many students in the school. 30 students from an international school in Singapore with ages ranging from 16-17 years of age took part in the experiment. Apparatus * Consent form. (Included in appendix i) * 2 lists of words. (Included in appendix ii & iii) * Debriefing letter. (Included in appendix vi) ...read more.

Conclusion

The limitations to this experiment was that there may have been demand characteristics, however counterbalancing was used to control for order effects as explained earlier on. The results may tend to be biased because some of the participants that took part in the experiment have done similar experiments before, therefore they may already know what to expect even though the list of words are different and the aim and objectives differ. Changes that could be made in the future when carrying out this experiment could be ensuring that the participants have not done any experiment similar to this so as to ensure more validity of results. Also, the list of words could be lengthened to see how well people can recall the words, and this might make the graph more distinct in peaks and dips because of the number of words used. Repeats could also be done so as to increase the reliability of the results. Conclusion In this experiment, the obtained results tend to show that participants do recall the first and last words better than the words in the middle portion, so this supports the primacy and recency effect shown in the serial position curve obtained by Glanzer and Cunitz (1968) which thus supports the assumption that there are two distinct memory stores in the multi store model of memory as proposed by Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. SHORT TERM MEMORY

    background noise that is occurring while the experiment is taking place can provide possibility of a distraction in the rehearsal. To control this, an empty classroom was used, with all doors and windows closed, providing an absolute silent. The participants themselves were asked to keep silent through the testing period.

  2. Investigate into the Primacy and Recency effect

    The participants were then given a blank sheet of paper. The participants were told that they had exactly one minute to write down as many words from the list that they could remember. The paper was then collected by one of the experimenters 5.

  1. Primacy and Recency effect

    remember the first few words known as the primary effect and the last few words which are known as the recency effect. Glanzer and Cunitz theory (1966) also supports the multi store model, which shows that the participants remember the first few words, which is due to rehearsal and the

  2. Recall in Memory Using Mnemonics

    The null hypothesis can be rejected and therefore the alternative hypothesis is retained. There is never certainty about whether the results were simply a fluke and so a type one error may have occurred. This means that a mistake may have been made in rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true.

  1. Investigating the short-term memory

    Here the mean score was calculated to be 8.5, which clearly reflects the high recalls scored. Alan Baddeley (1966) came up with the idea that coding in short term memory was based on the sound of the word or Acoustic memory, which was concluded after his study.

  2. 'Organisation in Memory'.

    There are many different models and theories that suggest that memory is organised or structured. Craik and Lockhart (1972) developed the 'Levels of Processing Theory.' They argued that deep processing needs to occur for information to be transferred from the short-term memory (STM)

  1. Stroop Effect

    * Consent: This ensures that all participants must have given their consent to participate in the study Due to the nature of the study, informed consent was not given and as a result, the participants were deceived. If they knew the nature of the study, then they will alternate their behaviour and distort the findings.

  2. "An experiment to see the effect of chunking on short-term memory recall".

    This graph clearly shows that the results on Test A were noticeably better than on Test B. This is consistent with the summary table above. This graph also shows that in general the scores on Test A range from 6-8 whereas with Test B they range from about 0-4.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work