• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

An experiment to test the existence of the rehearsal loop using interference with numbers.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Contents Title Introduction Rationale Aim Hypotheses Design Independent Variable Dependent Variable Sampling and Participants Apparatus Procedure Summary table and commentary Conclusion Bar Chart Implications of Study Generalisation of findings Validity Reliability Application of study to everyday life References Appendices Title An experiment to test the existence of the rehearsal loop using interference with numbers. Introduction This study is based on the area of cognitive psychology, in particular, theories of memory. William James (1890) argued that one must distinguish between two types of memory - primary and secondary. We now refer to these as short-term memory (STM) and long-term memory (LTM) respectively. This leads onto the Atkinson and Shiffrin model of memory which was one of the earliest information processing models to be based on James's distinction. Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968,71) claimed that memory consisted of three memory stores which were the sensory store, the short-term store and long-term storm. A stimulus received by our senses (such as reading words) passes through the stores in that order with some information being lost en route. Any new information retained will always pass through in this way. According to the Atkinson and Shiffrin model, whether or not information passes into the LTM from STM depends on whether it is rehearsed. If you want to remember something, you repeat it several times in your head therefore increasing the likelihood that it will be transferred into LTM. The main emphasis on this multi-store model of memory is on structure rather than process - concentration is on the way in which our memory is structured, not how it is processed. ...read more.

Middle

the affects of parties, coffee, lessons etc. which might have affected their results. > Ethically I met the guidelines of the B.P.S. RESULTS Table showing how many trigrams each participant recalled Participants without interference Participants with interference 7 4 11 6 8 4 5 5 Number of trigrams recalled out of 15 6 3 9 6 10 4 6 3 7 5 9 2 Mean 7.8 4.2 Range 6 (11-5) 4 (6-2) Mode 9,7,6 4 The results show that more trigrams were recalled from participants who had no interference to contend with. This can be shown most clearly by the mean (7.8) and mode (9,7,6) which have considerably higher numbers than the mean (4.2) and mode (4) of participants who had interference. Another good indicator of the difference between results is the highest value. This value is five higher (11) in the no interference group compared to with interference (6). The lowest value is three higher (5) compared to 2. Apart from that '5' value in the no interference group, there does not appear to be any anomalies. The bar chart, however, is the clearest portrayal of the results. The chart compares the two mean values of the groups and because one (7.8) is 3.6 values higher than the groups with interference (4.2), this is very obvious on the chart. The value 7.8 is just over half of the maximum number of trigrams that could be recalled; 4.2 is just over a quarter of the maximum number of trigrams that could be recalled. ...read more.

Conclusion

Neither could the mood of the participant, as some were happy to perform the experiment whereas others were not and they found it tedious - this could have affected the results. I was able, though, to make sure the participant had no previous exposure to the experiment because I used independent groups instead of repeated measures. Generally though, the fact that my procedure is so clearly stated makes the study easy to replicate. Improving the reliability comes down to the setting of the experiment, which is not accessible to the general public. It would be useful therefore to have performed the experiment in a quite place other than that in a common room, as this would not be available to most people. Application of the study to everyday life Certainly the experiment itself is totally unrealistic and therefore can't be applied to everyday life. However, the concept of testing the rehearsal loop can be applied. This is the basic reason behind every exam - to discover how well the candidate has been able to transfer information between the memory stores. Problems with the rehearsal loop could result in a lack of information being transferred to LTM and therefore poor revision techniques and poor results. The use of different forms of interference would have been interesting as well. The use of television and music as ways of distraction would have shown to what extent people are affected by everyday forms communication and entertainment. This could be linked to people who drive with very loud music playing and are therefore often the cause of many road crashes through their negligence of those around them. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. SHORT TERM MEMORY

    The purpose of the study is to establish whether a distraction will affect this process, and how many words from the lists given will be remembered with or without a distraction. The study is being conducted as the head experimenter and a teacher of the Psychology Department at the Brinsworth Sixth Form College.

  2. Memory: Rote Rehearsal and Mental Imagery.

    Standardised instructions (see appendix) and a casual seating arrangement were used to minimise the 'experimenter effect'. As the experimenter expectations could have influenced the results through body language or though slight modifications to the instructions. All the word cards were written in the same font, times new roman, size 14, on Microsoft Word.

  1. Stroop Test Experiment

    For example, blue would be written in red ink and red would be written in yellow ink. There will also be a control, where the words will match the ink colour that they are written in.

  2. Describe the application of behaviorist perspectives in health and social care. Describe the application ...

    The cognitive psychological approach was formed in the 1960s. This approach consists of the understanding of attention, memory, perception, information processing, problem solving, thought, language and other aspects of cognition. Piaget who was a Swiss psychologist researched on how to measure intelligence of an individual.

  1. Psychology Retrospective Interference coursework

    This may be a confounding variable which would affect the validity of this experiment because it cannot be generalized in other age groups. However, it is convenient and easy to get access to the target population. Another extraneous variable is that opportunity sampling was chosen for this experiment.

  2. How interference affects memory recall

    Variables My IV is whether participants listen to music for 1min 30 seconds after they have learnt the list of words or whether they recall the words straight away. My DV is the number of words recalled. Participants and Sampling My target population is students age 16 to 17 years old.

  1. Investigating the short-term memory

    far from reliable because it's not close to the mean average calculated. Predictive hypothesis supports the fact that when a distraction is added to group 2's experiment, their result would be affected in some way. The result derived from the experiment supports the predictive hypothesis as the distraction did affect

  2. An investigation to discover the effects of retroactive interference on memory recall.

    This method again was criticised by many cognitive psychologists as they claimed that the taking the experiment away from the laboratories meant that you couldn't control the variables. Aim * The aim of my experiment is to investigate the effects of retroactive interference on memory recall.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work