• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

An experiment to test the existence of the rehearsal loop using interference with numbers.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Contents Title Introduction Rationale Aim Hypotheses Design Independent Variable Dependent Variable Sampling and Participants Apparatus Procedure Summary table and commentary Conclusion Bar Chart Implications of Study Generalisation of findings Validity Reliability Application of study to everyday life References Appendices Title An experiment to test the existence of the rehearsal loop using interference with numbers. Introduction This study is based on the area of cognitive psychology, in particular, theories of memory. William James (1890) argued that one must distinguish between two types of memory - primary and secondary. We now refer to these as short-term memory (STM) and long-term memory (LTM) respectively. This leads onto the Atkinson and Shiffrin model of memory which was one of the earliest information processing models to be based on James's distinction. Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968,71) claimed that memory consisted of three memory stores which were the sensory store, the short-term store and long-term storm. A stimulus received by our senses (such as reading words) passes through the stores in that order with some information being lost en route. Any new information retained will always pass through in this way. According to the Atkinson and Shiffrin model, whether or not information passes into the LTM from STM depends on whether it is rehearsed. If you want to remember something, you repeat it several times in your head therefore increasing the likelihood that it will be transferred into LTM. The main emphasis on this multi-store model of memory is on structure rather than process - concentration is on the way in which our memory is structured, not how it is processed. ...read more.

Middle

the affects of parties, coffee, lessons etc. which might have affected their results. > Ethically I met the guidelines of the B.P.S. RESULTS Table showing how many trigrams each participant recalled Participants without interference Participants with interference 7 4 11 6 8 4 5 5 Number of trigrams recalled out of 15 6 3 9 6 10 4 6 3 7 5 9 2 Mean 7.8 4.2 Range 6 (11-5) 4 (6-2) Mode 9,7,6 4 The results show that more trigrams were recalled from participants who had no interference to contend with. This can be shown most clearly by the mean (7.8) and mode (9,7,6) which have considerably higher numbers than the mean (4.2) and mode (4) of participants who had interference. Another good indicator of the difference between results is the highest value. This value is five higher (11) in the no interference group compared to with interference (6). The lowest value is three higher (5) compared to 2. Apart from that '5' value in the no interference group, there does not appear to be any anomalies. The bar chart, however, is the clearest portrayal of the results. The chart compares the two mean values of the groups and because one (7.8) is 3.6 values higher than the groups with interference (4.2), this is very obvious on the chart. The value 7.8 is just over half of the maximum number of trigrams that could be recalled; 4.2 is just over a quarter of the maximum number of trigrams that could be recalled. ...read more.

Conclusion

Neither could the mood of the participant, as some were happy to perform the experiment whereas others were not and they found it tedious - this could have affected the results. I was able, though, to make sure the participant had no previous exposure to the experiment because I used independent groups instead of repeated measures. Generally though, the fact that my procedure is so clearly stated makes the study easy to replicate. Improving the reliability comes down to the setting of the experiment, which is not accessible to the general public. It would be useful therefore to have performed the experiment in a quite place other than that in a common room, as this would not be available to most people. Application of the study to everyday life Certainly the experiment itself is totally unrealistic and therefore can't be applied to everyday life. However, the concept of testing the rehearsal loop can be applied. This is the basic reason behind every exam - to discover how well the candidate has been able to transfer information between the memory stores. Problems with the rehearsal loop could result in a lack of information being transferred to LTM and therefore poor revision techniques and poor results. The use of different forms of interference would have been interesting as well. The use of television and music as ways of distraction would have shown to what extent people are affected by everyday forms communication and entertainment. This could be linked to people who drive with very loud music playing and are therefore often the cause of many road crashes through their negligence of those around them. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To retain recall, which is more beneficial, rote rehearsal or imagery?

    4 star(s)

    to see whether imagery (elaborative) or maintenance (Rote rehearsal) is most likely to aid recall. In the Null Hypothesis there will be no significant difference between the twenty numbers of noun words recalled between group A (control) or group B (experimental) and any difference that was found will be due to chance alone.

  2. SHORT TERM MEMORY

    The purpose of the study is to establish whether a distraction will affect this process, and how many words from the lists given will be remembered with or without a distraction. The study is being conducted as the head experimenter and a teacher of the Psychology Department at the Brinsworth Sixth Form College.

  1. Memory: Rote Rehearsal and Mental Imagery.

    This was like a distracter task. Then the participants were asked to write as many words from their list as they could with no regard to the order, spelling or time. (See appendix). Each group consisted of ten males, and ten female and all participants were aged between 16-18 as

  2. Stroop Test Experiment

    The sample was approached in and around the sixth form block, including the common room, study room and sixth form canteen. MATERIALS: The stroop experimental list is a word list in which each word is a colour name, but always written in a different ink colour.

  1. Investigating the short-term memory

    in the 2nd condition the standard deviation was high which refers to the mean not being reliable and therefore results being far from it. A less wide spread of data would help us come to more detailed conclusion in which less mistakes would have occurred.

  2. Describe the application of behaviorist perspectives in health and social care. Describe the application ...

    This can explain why a person may show signs of delinquent behaviors as they see theme selves outside of society so forming to what society does is something that they will not what to do due to them having a feeling of no role in life.

  1. How interference affects memory recall

    all the extraneous variables such as the word list, amount of time participants have to study word list and the time they have to recall wordlist and the amount of time they have to listen to the music. Another advantage is that a laboratory experiment ha ecological validity as my

  2. Psychology Retrospective Interference coursework

    This means that each participant in each group experiences only one condition of the independent variable, therefore, controlling individual differences is left to chance. However, it was not considered as a significant confounding variable that needed to be eliminated because independent groups design avoids order effects.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work