• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

An investigation into the effects of generation on memory

Extracts from this document...


AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE EFFECTS OF GENERATION ON MEMORY LAB STUDIES: Hugh Miller By Jenni Pigeon Introduction Memory research is incredibly valuablethe modern world where we have more and more to remember, such as revision at school and university, shopping lists, prospective memory and knowledge of the world. We have generally become more interested in the ways we can improve our memory, including looking at the meaning and structure of how and what we remember and how we can reduce forgetting. Teachers and cognitive psychologists have come up with theories for improving memory but there is limited research. For example they have talked about Spacing Effect, Modality Effect, Bizareness Effect, Encoding-Difficulty Effect and Encoding-Context Effect and more. Strategies like mnemonics have been thought to help deeper processing and storage but they can only be used for unrelated material. Slamecka and Graf (1978) talked about the Generation Effect (in particular the Self Generation Effect). This effect happens when mnemonic aids are self generated which leads to deeper processing, increased meaning and more links to schemas which evidently leads to better memory. They presented subjects with words that were to be generated by themselves and then the same words that were just to be read. They also tried variations, such as timed and untimed, but across them all they found that performance was better in the generated word condition than the read condition. ...read more.


Most of the participants were students. Materials Two lists of words were produced, one with a list of words with the first letter of its opposite as a trigger for the generated word and the other with a list of words deliberately similar to the generated list. Participants recorded the words they remembered on a plain sheet of paper (see appendices). Design An independent groups design was used. There was no independent or dependent variable as an exploratory study was carried out. It was counterbalanced by presenting the two lists in an alternate order to each participant to avoid order effects. Procedure The investigation was carried out in quiet surroundings and participants were tested individually. They were informed briefly about the aim of the study, given standardised instructions (including having the right to withdraw at any time) and presented with the first list. After this, they were asked to do an interference task which involved counting backwards from 100. They then wrote down as many words as they could recall in as much time as they needed. The procedure was repeated for the second list. Participants were debriefed and data was collected. Results The results of the procedure: Read list Generate list 8 10 10 10 7 8 12 12 Task N Generate Read Amount of words t significant? ...read more.


This could be useful in a further replication. Another strength of this investigation was that counterbalancing was used to reduce order effects. Subjects were given the generated list and the read list in alternate orders. It should be brought to our attention that other confounding variables may have affected the accuracy of the results, such as subject variables and demand characteristics. This type of memory experiment is fairly common in psychology and participants may have deliberately changed their memory in accordance with what results were expected. The study was also not ecologically representative. Opportunity samples are generally more representative than other sampling methods, but mostly students were used. Students are not representative of the population and there is evidence that they are not good participants. It is likely that the primary and recency effects have occurred in this study and also in Slamecka and Graf's. The study could become more reliable and be improved by using more people (and a more representative sample) and perhaps by using a larger variation of words (different lists) and then calculating the mean. It is possible that the words we used we easier to remember than others. It could also be made more real to life. The study shows that memory does depend on processes at the time of learning and that if we are able to generate the material we need to remember more then it is more likely to be stored for longer or transferred to the long term memory. Jenni Pigeon 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays


    The results recorded for the investigation do support some aspects of the background studies mentioned in the introduction. Atkinson & Shiffrin proposed the idea of a multi-store model, which compares the mental procedures of human to that of computer operations.

  2. Primacy and Recency effect

    values it seems that the Recency have a higher recall rate than the Primacy and hence the difference is quite small between them. This overall shows us that the recall rates for the first few words and the last few words are better recalled than the middle words in a word list.

  1. Psychology Retrospective Interference coursework

    The experimenter will test you by having you write down the ten adjectives. You will then be asked to remember another list of ten adjectives. Please try to learn all of these in 5 minutes. You will be told when the time is up.

  2. Memory and Mental Imagery

    (See appendix). Each group consisted of ten males, and ten female and all participants were aged 18 or above. The independent variable in this experiment was one group's use of mental imagery, and the control group not using mental imagery.

  1. An investigation to discover the effects of retroactive interference on memory recall.

    This interference list is being used to test its effect on the recall of the primary word list. Dependent Variable The dependent variable in this experiment is the number of correctly recalled words remembered in a free recall memory test.

  2. Recall in Memory Using Mnemonics

    Also, Paivio in 1971 found the same results and concluded that the reason for the improved recall when associated with visual images is that the information is encoded in two separate ways, both verbally and visual which gives the person double the chance of recalling the information later.

  1. Stroop Effect

    One of the groups will do condition A first. This is naming the noun words first and then colour words, and the other group will do it vice versa. (Condition B) The independent variable in this investigation is the variable the experimenter manipulates. This is the condition of colour words and noun words.

  2. The Effects of Humor and Incongruence on Word Recall

    Thus, the when the effects of incongruence and humor are combined together, their effects intensify so the level with humorous sentences and nonmatching images would have a highest number of word recall relative to any other level. Method Participants Fifteen undergraduates from the University of California, Los Angeles participated in this experiment.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work