• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13

Anti-Social Behaviour Orders have been promoted as 'mixing the best of the civil and criminal law'. Critically explore this legislative innovation with particular reference to its underlying ideology.

Extracts from this document...


Anti-Social Behaviour Orders have been promoted as 'mixing the best of the civil and criminal law'. Critically explore this legislative innovation with particular reference to its underlying ideology. As a fairly recently developed innovation, introduced less than six years ago on the 1st April 1999 under the Crime and Disorder Act 1998, the Anti-Social Behaviour Order (ASBO) remains a popular topic of discussion for politicians, the media and the broader general public alike. The Government has recently reiterated its intention to stamp out the problems cited under the somewhat broad heading of 'antisocial behaviour' by introducing new powers in the Anti-Social Behaviour Act 2003. It is clear that the Government considers this a priority in the field of dealing with crime, be that for ideological reasons or for political reasons. Firstly it is important to look at what anti-social behaviour is, and what the anti-social behaviour order aims to achieve, before it is possible to determine the success of the measure and assess the degree to which the aims have been achieved. The Crime and Disorder Act 1998 defined antisocial behaviour as acting in a "manner that caused or was likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress to one or more persons not of the same household". This definition appears to be somewhat unhelpful, in that it is wide open to opinion and interpretation. As pointed out in a report on findings of a recent Crime and Justice survey, "people have different expectations and levels of tolerance. What one person may find offensive or distressing, another person might view as innocuous"1. For example, a group of five or six youths on a street corner at 7 p.m. shouting and laughing may be intimidating to an elderly lady living on her own, but a twenty-five year old male may well think nothing of it. The British Crime Survey of 2000 stated that nine per cent of adults had experienced disorderly and antisocial behaviour in the last year. ...read more.


'naming and shaming', which may even lead as far as national newspapers. A British Government Social Survey revealed that whilst only ten per cent of youths ranked 'the punishment I might get' as the most important consequence of arrest, fifty-five per cent said either 'what my family' or 'my girlfriend' would think about it, with a further twelve per cent selecting 'the publicity or shame of having to appear in court'11. This idea is proposed by John Braithwaite, who argues that whilst punishment erects barriers between the offender and punisher by creating a relationship of power assertion and injury, whereas shaming produces a greater 'interconnectedness'12. This builds on the theories of Tittle, who argued that "the extent [to which] individuals are deterred from deviance by fear, the fear that is relevant is most likely to be that their deviance will evoke some respect or status loss among acquaintances or in the community as a whole"13. So in light of this theory, I believe the ASBO can be interpreted slightly differently, or rather it has a further aspect to its ideology. It is preventative in that it aims to stop repeat offenders by laying down what they cannot do, but it also aims to both stop repeat offenders and deter would-be offenders by saying if you are found guilty of the offence(s) and an ASBO is issued upon you, everyone will know about it - building on this idea that people fear the publicity and shame of courts and publicised Orders, perhaps in many cases more than punishment such as a short term of imprisonment or fine. Ultimately of course if this publicity does not act as a deterrent, repeat offenders will run the risk of criminal proceedings anyway - so the presence of two very different deterrents within the ASBO should act as some sort of double safeguard. The idea of deterrence, whether through the terms of the Order, the eventual threat of criminal proceedings or in the form of the 'naming and shaming' ...read more.


Finally it is important to note that as with any legislative measure, there is a degree of political influence. Whilst I have outlined the ideological elements behind the ASBO above, it is imperative to remember that as such a popular topic of discussion and concern amongst the general public, the issue of antisocial behaviour becomes one which is used by political parties to try to gain an advantage over their rivals. The importance of this issue to the country can perhaps best be identified by the fact that both major parties recognise a need for something to be done. Unfortunately, it is the political debate that has perhaps exposed the lack of true ideological concerns behind the ASBO, revealing it as a means of punishment as opposed to anything else. The Home Secretary (at the time) David Blunkett stated this quite clearly, "they [the 'specialist prosecutors'] will lead the response of the criminal justice system ... with a firm resolve to ensure offenders receive the punishments they deserve"15 and this desire was echoed recently following the afore-mentioned Birmingham ASBO case by the Conservative Party's vice-chairman, "this group of yobs deserve serious punishment ... this is happening all across Britain ... society is getting out of control"16. I believe that the ASBO does exhibit some of the ideologies expressed above, but perhaps most of all a keen desire to deter and to prevent antisocial behaviour being a precursor to criminal behaviour, as the report on the 2003 Crime and Justice Survey identifies, "given the link found between antisocial behaviour and other offences, tackling the former should help prevent young people progressing to more serious offending". As part of a wider antisocial behaviour policy, the ASBO is an effective preventative measure, but arguably the work is to be done in assessing the root causes of the particularly serious aspects the ASBO covers (drug abuse, prostitution, racial abuse) and dealing with them (education, upbringing, poverty). It may then be possible to truly nip antisocial behaviour in the bud, just as the ASBO attempts to do with crime. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Preventing and Reducing Crime

    3 star(s)

    (Blackburn, R.) The socialisation process accounts for this. For example, compliance with social rules especially the moral rules regulating interaction between people. Kurtines, Alvarez et al. [1990], Moral Standards and Behaviour have done studies on this area of interaction. Due to the lack of the socialisation process, criminal behaviour is

  2. Psychology of Crime

    Christie and Ellis aimed to compare the effectiveness of recall of faces with photofit techniques. They found that verbal recall is more accurate than photofit images. This means that identikits are not effective in identifying suspects as people tend to see the face as a whole, so results will be more varied and reducing the usefulness of identikits.

  1. Pro and Anti Social Behaviour

    However, if the temperature becomes very intense, then there is often less aggressive behaviour as people try to escape or simply become unreceptive. Baron and Bell (1976) supported their theory by studying the effects of heat on aggression. They did this by seeing how willing participants were to give electric shocks to other people (confederate).

  2. Enter Achilles (DV8) Review - Laura Mathis

    In front of a mirror, a circus of preening men fix their hair, fold their collars, dust their chests, each circling one another in a meandering formation as the pedestrian movements are taken out of their natural state. They strut, they smoke, they scrap - all stylized stereotypes of the modern man.

  1. Psychological Theories on Crime Prevention and Offender Treatment

    Jacobs work is not without its flaws and other researchers have found that the increased street activity found in these older communities increases street crime rates because it affords more opportunities for crime to take place. Newman (1972) agreed with the basis of Jacobs ideas but furthered her theory and created what he called his "Defensible Space Theory".

  2. Psychological Theories Of Crime

    He called this bond monotropy. Bowlby further argued that the long term consequences of maternal deprivation could cause delinquency, reduced intelligence, increased aggression, depression and affectionless psychopathy. But to prevent this, a child should receive the continuous care of this single most important attachment figure for approximately the first two years of life.

  1. Conformity discussion.

    Participants * 32 Participants were used in total all of whom were tutors * 16 were Males, and the other 16 Females * High answer condition: 8 Males, 8 Females * Low answer condition: 8 Males, 8 Females The tutors were chosen on an opportunist basis i.e.

  2. "Anti-Social Behaviour is caused by a person's family background"

    therefore look to other ways to achieve their goals, this might be through deviant behaviour or crime. It is argued that the absence of a father figure lacks family control of children and deprives boys of a male role model according to BBC news 2002.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work