• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Are Forgotten Memories Lost, or Just Irretrievable ?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Are Forgotten Memories Lost, or Just Irretrievable ?.Discuss. ============================================================= Introduction Memory is a great artist. For every man and for every woman, it makes the recollection of his or her life a work of art and an unfaithful record. (Maurois, 1929) Memories are events in our daily life that are either retained because they are personally significant or lost because of their insignificance. Retained memories may be of a vivid quality but their accuracy upon retrieval is questionable, containing minor or major errors. Substitution of the Old for the New Loftus (Loftus & Loftus,1980) provided evidence disproving the view that all memories are permanent and thus potentially recoverable. It was argued that when people are given new and misleading information about a previously seen incident, they are often unable to remember the original incident accurately and that the "forgetting" observed under these conditions is due to the loss of original memories once new information has been encoded. That is, substitution of the old information for the new has occured. This updating of old memories is assumed to be automatic and has the consequence of removing any previously existing knowledge that is contradicted by the new information. ...read more.

Middle

Incidents which cause considerable stress or physical injury may impair or prevent recall. However, studies which involve the use of hypnosis to enhance recall were not found to be significant. Forensic hypnotists have also consistently alleged that new information have been provided in most cases where hypnosis have been employed. However, further discussion have suggested that both accurate and inaccurate information are elicited during the forensic interview, probably due to a number of factors unrelated to the hypnotic intervention. The numerous differences between the typical hypnotic and non-hypnotic interview means that users of forensic hypnosis cannot know whether the hypnotic intervention was a factor influencing the performance of a witness. This consideration, and the likelihood that users of forensic hypnosis will selectively attend to and remember the successes, can adequately account for their strong beliefs in the efficacy of hypnosis. The empirical evidence pertaining to the effects of hypnosis on the recall of events after several months have elapsed is also somewhat inadequate, but suggests that hypnosis does not facilitate remembering under these circumstances. Hence, it is evident that hypnosis fails to offer any insight into the existence of "forgotten " memories. ...read more.

Conclusion

Any situation resulting in the false recognition of new information as previously experienced may be explained in terms of similarities in surface features and semantic properties between what is remembered and fact. Conversely, failure to remember an event would also be due to a simlarity effect because actual events merge into and become indistinguishable from generic "events" compatible with what the person thinks could have happened. Hence most autobiographical memories are true but inaccurate. These errors, though, may be mediated by an accurate "self-portrait" because not every memory can be accepted as one's own. The sense of familarity created by an event is associated with a judgement that the event is true to what most likely occured and consistent with what should have happened. Conclusion In conclusion, forgotten memories are probably neither lost nor irretrievable. The conditions on retrieval may possibly influence the process. The integration of other information may also affect and modify the original information. Also, personal judgement and self-depiction of the event may also distort the memory of the event. Hence, it is a host of inter-webbed factors that may cause the phenomenon of "forgetfulness" and not one explanation is totally satisfactory. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Are memories permanent and unalterable?

    4 star(s)

    During this electrical stimulation, Penfield discovered that by placing the stimulating electrode in certain parts of the brain and especially on the frontal lobe, caused some patients to have 'flashbacks' of past experiences. According to his beliefs, "It is clear that the neuronal action that accompanies each succeeding state of consciousness leaves its permanent imprint on the brain.

  2. Memory: Rote Rhearsal and Mental Imagery.

    This would have added to the effect of the extraneous variable. Participants were chosen by means of an Opportunity Sample largely because it was convenient and also because the experiment was to be done on a small scale.

  1. Report on Psychological Research into Eyewitness Testimony

    This suggests that although the victim was more likely to be traumatised by the event and find it more anxiety provoking, they were able to remember the details more precisely.12 In separate investigations into the effect of stress on a witnesses memory studies have been used to prove the Yerkes-Dodson

  2. A counselling Interview

    Incorporating micro-skills, I tried not only to understand and interpret Lee's verbal messages but also his non-verbal behaviours, which has relaxed as we moved deeper into his story. His arms had uncrossed and eye contact had improved. I felt at this stage I had entered an advanced empathy stage and

  1. Investigating the effects of organisation on learning

    This was unexpected, as it was hypothesised that those to whom information was presented randomly would remember less information than those to whom it was presented in categories. Figure 1 shows the median (14.5 for Condition A; 15 for Condition B), range (6 for Condition A, 10 for Condition B)

  2. Events forgotten.

    She told him her ear felt funny. Another little jolt and her foot twitched. And so on. Then something strange happened. He sent in a jolt and the patient reported she was back in childhood, hearing her mother call to her to come into the kitchen.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work