• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Are Forgotten Memories Lost, or Just Irretrievable ?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Are Forgotten Memories Lost, or Just Irretrievable ?.Discuss. ============================================================= Introduction Memory is a great artist. For every man and for every woman, it makes the recollection of his or her life a work of art and an unfaithful record. (Maurois, 1929) Memories are events in our daily life that are either retained because they are personally significant or lost because of their insignificance. Retained memories may be of a vivid quality but their accuracy upon retrieval is questionable, containing minor or major errors. Substitution of the Old for the New Loftus (Loftus & Loftus,1980) provided evidence disproving the view that all memories are permanent and thus potentially recoverable. It was argued that when people are given new and misleading information about a previously seen incident, they are often unable to remember the original incident accurately and that the "forgetting" observed under these conditions is due to the loss of original memories once new information has been encoded. That is, substitution of the old information for the new has occured. This updating of old memories is assumed to be automatic and has the consequence of removing any previously existing knowledge that is contradicted by the new information. ...read more.

Middle

Incidents which cause considerable stress or physical injury may impair or prevent recall. However, studies which involve the use of hypnosis to enhance recall were not found to be significant. Forensic hypnotists have also consistently alleged that new information have been provided in most cases where hypnosis have been employed. However, further discussion have suggested that both accurate and inaccurate information are elicited during the forensic interview, probably due to a number of factors unrelated to the hypnotic intervention. The numerous differences between the typical hypnotic and non-hypnotic interview means that users of forensic hypnosis cannot know whether the hypnotic intervention was a factor influencing the performance of a witness. This consideration, and the likelihood that users of forensic hypnosis will selectively attend to and remember the successes, can adequately account for their strong beliefs in the efficacy of hypnosis. The empirical evidence pertaining to the effects of hypnosis on the recall of events after several months have elapsed is also somewhat inadequate, but suggests that hypnosis does not facilitate remembering under these circumstances. Hence, it is evident that hypnosis fails to offer any insight into the existence of "forgotten " memories. ...read more.

Conclusion

Any situation resulting in the false recognition of new information as previously experienced may be explained in terms of similarities in surface features and semantic properties between what is remembered and fact. Conversely, failure to remember an event would also be due to a simlarity effect because actual events merge into and become indistinguishable from generic "events" compatible with what the person thinks could have happened. Hence most autobiographical memories are true but inaccurate. These errors, though, may be mediated by an accurate "self-portrait" because not every memory can be accepted as one's own. The sense of familarity created by an event is associated with a judgement that the event is true to what most likely occured and consistent with what should have happened. Conclusion In conclusion, forgotten memories are probably neither lost nor irretrievable. The conditions on retrieval may possibly influence the process. The integration of other information may also affect and modify the original information. Also, personal judgement and self-depiction of the event may also distort the memory of the event. Hence, it is a host of inter-webbed factors that may cause the phenomenon of "forgetfulness" and not one explanation is totally satisfactory. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Are memories permanent and unalterable?

    4 star(s)

    During this electrical stimulation, Penfield discovered that by placing the stimulating electrode in certain parts of the brain and especially on the frontal lobe, caused some patients to have 'flashbacks' of past experiences. According to his beliefs, "It is clear that the neuronal action that accompanies each succeeding state of consciousness leaves its permanent imprint on the brain.

  2. Memory: Rote Rhearsal and Mental Imagery.

    This would have added to the effect of the extraneous variable. Participants were chosen by means of an Opportunity Sample largely because it was convenient and also because the experiment was to be done on a small scale.

  1. A counselling Interview

    As we examined the possibility of reducing the 'pressure cooker' effect upon Lee, his non-verbal posture became more animated, leaning forward towards me, mimicking my SOLER. Also he began playing with his fingers as he spoke and increasing eye contact, showing a subconscious awareness of advanced empathy and therefore signifying a critical point in the session.

  2. Memory: Rote Rehearsal and Mental Imagery.

    with the use of mental imagery than rote rehearsal and therefore found it easier to imagine the word pairs interacting with one another. One participant in the experiment commented that she felt pressured by the large number in the distracter task.

  1. Report on Psychological Research into Eyewitness Testimony

    These findings allowed Loftus to conclude that the misleading question was the cause of correct information being replaced in the memory by false information. It was also claimed that over time the effect of misleading questions becomes more pronounced. This research is supported by other studies, and so the evidence provided is considered to be reliable.

  2. Investigating the effects of organisation on learning

    Nonetheless, organisation cannot be rejected as a key factor in remembering information. A trend was noticed in the participants assigned to Condition B to group together the words into the same categories that were listed in Condition A. Indeed, this appears to be the same phenomenon that Bousfield (1953)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work