• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Assess the extent to which psychological explanations and research have established the factors in interpersonal attraction

Extracts from this document...


"Looks are everything" - Assess the extent to which psychological explanations and research have established the factors in interpersonal attraction There have been many differing explanations of the factors in interpersonal attraction. One such explanation is physical attraction, and it has been found that people who are more physically attractive enjoy a wide variety of benefits in a number of different societies. For example, Stewart (1980) found that in a courtroom, people who were more physically attractive got, on average, shorter sentences than those who were less attractive, supporting the assumption. Similarly, Landy & Segal (1974) found that essays were given a higher grade when a photograph of an attractive person was attached than when the same essay had a photograph of a less attractive person attached to it. The notion that attractive people are treated better than unattractive people is supported further by Stephan & Langlois (1984), who found that parents may treat attractive offspring better than others. ...read more.


Similarly, the studies attempted to rate attractiveness on a scale from "attractive" to "unattractive" with the assumption that everybody would find the "attractive" people attractive and vice versa for those who were "unattractive". It may be, however, that people are attracted to people on the same "level" as themselves in terms of attractiveness. Walster et al. (1966) proposed a "matching hypothesis" which describes this idea. In their study, college students were assigned dates at random for a dance, but were told that the assignment of partners was based on a questionnaire that they had filled in to find their perfect match. When asked if they liked their date, physical attractiveness was found to be the biggest factor in producing an affirmative response, irrespective of the person's own attractiveness. Although this does not support the matching hypothesis, it was criticised for its lack of relevance to real life, as people are often not assigned dates and can choose them for themselves. ...read more.


When girls go through puberty, their body shape changes such that fat is deposited in their lower body, making the size of the hips larger than that of the waist. Singh identified the optimum WHR as being 0.7, which he also noted as indicating health and fertility. Singh's 0.7 WHR theory has been tested in different countries and found still to hold, so it has cultural validity, but it may not be ecologically valid as the experiments relied on line-drawings as opposed to real photographs or seeing people 'in the flesh'. Nonetheless, the findings still held when Henss (2000) used photographs which were edited using computer software to indicate different ratios, supporting further the theory. Evolutionary theory suggests that women look for men who, again, are healthy and fertile, but who are also strong and can protect them and their children. Herzog & Franzoi (1987) in a study of American college students found that the most attractive quality in men is the upper body. Other studies have found broad shoulders and an 'upside-down triangle' shape is the most attractive: broad shoulders and a smaller waist. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Critically Compare the Factors that Affect Interpersonal Attraction and the Development of Relationships

    People expect people similar to them to like them therefore are more likely to initiate friendship. Individuals are most attracted to and become more involved with individuals that share similar backgrounds, educational levels, beliefs, and values. But what about the theory that opposites attract?

  2. The matching hypothesis

    Next forms produced with the photos on the back of the score sheet, with a rank of 1-10 (10 being the highest- most attractive, see appendix). There is an equal amount of participants, made sure the study was carried out in a suitable area with an equal number of male

  1. An Investigation to see whether the halo effect is present when rating personality ...

    who found that white university students were more likely to rate black defendants as more guilty than white defendants. This shows that the race of the defendants is important as matters such as discrimination and prejudice can affect the sentence of time given by participants.

  2. Physiological Arousal and its Effects on Females interpretations of physical attractiveness

    One very interesting field study of misattribution of arousal was conducted by Dutton and Aron (1974). In this study, an attractive female or male experimenter approached men as they crossed either a high, rickety suspension bridge or a low safe bridge at a popular tourist site in North Vancouver, British Columbia.

  1. The Matching Hypothesis

    as opposed to 22% in the couples who were not similar in physical attractiveness. Other support for the matching hypothesis also comes from Murstein's study (1972). In the study photographs of real couples (who were either engaged or in a stable relationship)

  2. Discuss interpersonal attraction

    the same beliefs and attitudes are more likely to form friendships than those who do not. These had led them to conclude that the more similar one's traits are with one another, the more likelihood to form relationships. This is because various things done by the person can be easily supported and understood by the partner.

  1. Outline two explanations of interpersonal attraction (e.g. matching hypothesis, evolutionary explanations) (12 marks). Evaluate ...

    These mechanisms are still active today, unconsciously guiding mating choices between men and woman. Evolutionary explanations of behaviour are based on the assumption that trends in behaviour can be accounted for by genetic predisposition.

  2. A Replication of the Study by Murstein Investigating the Matching Hypothesis

    This study provides strong support for the Matching Hypothesis. Silverman, (1971) conducted a field experiment which, like Murstein's investigation, provides indirect support for the Matching Hypothesis. Couples were covertly observed in naturalistic dating settings (bars, clubs, theatres) by two males and two females; unmarried and between the ages of 18 and 22.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work