• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Briefly outline findings from studies of majority influence (conformity) and consider the value of such studies.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Psychology Essay Lorraine Yates 'Most studies of majority influence (conformity) have been carried out in labs and thus might not tell us much about the way people conform in the real world.' Briefly outline findings from studies of majority influence (conformity) and consider the value of such studies. Conformity or majority influence as it can also be called is a form of social influence where people adopt the behaviours, attitudes and values of other members of a group. Crutchfield and Zimbardo both set out to study the issue of majority influence. However, they both had different methods of doing so and both came out with different findings. Crutchfield used an efficient and ethical study; it was much more practical because more participants could be tested quickly on a large variety of tasks Studying conformity in private meant that the study was more ethical because they were not put in an embarrassing situation. Although, like in all studies the participants were deceived as to the purpose of the study. After testing 600 participants, in a 3day assessment programme, these were Crutchfields findings; * Participants were asked to compare the size of a circle and a star, the circle being much larger of the 2. ...read more.

Middle

Crutchfields study also provides an insight into the effect of personality on conformity however, Crutchfield did find that there was a lack of evidence to suggest that there was a 'conforming personality'. Yet, Crutchfield found that participants with a high score in intelligence and leadership ability displayed less conformity. Is this because they aren't intimidated by the lab surroundings or because they are happy with their answers and believe what they say is right? Another psychologist who studied conformity was Zimbardo. Zimbardo set out to study whether people conform to the influence of social roles. He did this by setting up a mock prison in the basement of Stanford University. There were 3 main cells, a solitary confinement cell and an observation room for the guards. He then asked for volunteers (all male) to act as prisoners or guards. The prisoners were arrested in their own homes, handcuffed and blindfolded then transported to the mock prison. Over a period of 6days the study became out of control and had to be terminated. ...read more.

Conclusion

These roles shaped their attitudes and behaviour. In comparison to Crutchfields study, Zimbardo made his study relate more to the real world as being arrested and imprisoned, whether guilty or not, could happen to anybody. There is lack of personality shown in this study because the participants are conforming to a different social role meaning they act out of character to conform and be like the person they are expected to 'play'. Another important factor is also that the 'prisoners' showed obedience to authority. They only rebelled once and then began to conform. They stopped fighting back and did as they were told to do. Even if it meant cleaning the toilets with their bare hands, as some were forced to do by the acting guards. In conclusion to these studies, we know that the ecological validity wasn't very good however we realise that the participants have to give informed consent to the study as psychologists would have to stalk their unknowing participants to be able to watch their behavioural patterns to some extent. There is a limit on how far psychologists can go to study the general public as there are privacy issues surrounding these studies. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Psychology Coursework - Conformity

    4 star(s)

    30 to 40, 10 males and 10 females will cause there to be more reliability as you will be able to control the amount of general knowledge between participants better. As a result compare the difference in conformity levels between males and females better.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    "Describe the main features of conformity and obedience analyse two conformity and obedience studies ...

    He is introduced to a stern looking experimenter in a white coat and a rather pleasant and friendly co-subject. The experimenter explains that the experiment will look into the role of punishment in learning, and that one will be the "teacher" and one will be the "learner."

  1. The aim of this experiment is to find out if people will conform without ...

    Design An experiment method was chosen for this study of faceless conformity. An experiment is an arrangement of conditions and procedures controlled by the researcher for the purpose of testing some hypothesis. The experiment involved the manipulation of variables.

  2. Consider whether the findings from social influence research (e.g. Asch, Milgram, Zimbardo) can justify ...

    Demand characteristics would have been an issue if Milgram had told the participants the true aim of the study and this is undesirable. Although there were issues based on informed consent, people argued that the study helped people review their value systems and made them aware of the destructiveness of obedience.

  1. conjugal roles

    The practicality of this research method is that it is quick and immediate rather than booking interviews with people. This will allow me to collect quantitative data, which means the data collected will be numerical. I will be doing questionnaires because although designing the questionnaire and performing the pilot studies

  2. The experiment conducted tested the theory of conformity under the influence of group pressure.

    to be self-moving or unstable because the darkness provides no frame to capture and stabilise the light source. The participants were placed in a dark room; Sherif instructed them that a light will appear and that it will move around (expectation effects?).

  1. Describe what psychologists know about leadership.

    Vroom and Yetton's decision-making model (1973) is another contingency theory that matches situational attributes with leader's decision-making strategies. The work situation is defined using seven answers to simple yes-no questions such as whether a high-quality decision is required and whether the leader possesses sufficient information to make it alone.

  2. Analyse the Studies into the Accuracy of Eyewitness Testimony

    (Tony malim,1998) Leading Questions Loftus and Palmer (1974) conducted an experiment on eyewitness testimony. In the experiment participants in the study were shown a film of a multiple car accident. Afterwards they were asked to describe what happened in their own words however, they were asked specific questions.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work