• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Britain In The Second World War - The Evacuation Of British Children- Source based work.

Extracts from this document...


2Victoria Newsum Exemplar Coursework Assignment Model A British History Britain In The Second World War The Evacuation Of British Children 1. Sources B and C are evidence about the start of the children's evacuation journey. Both can be described as useful but only to a certain extent. Source B is a photograph taken in September 1939 of the evacuees walking to the station in London. Photographs show exactly what is happening at a specific point in time. The photograph was taken in 1939 which was when evacuations were taking place. The photograph gives us information about how the children were evacuated and what they took with them. It also shows the expressions on the children's faces so we can see if they were happy or sad. Unfortunately the photograph does not show how the children were feeling so we don't know if they were smiling for the camera or if they were genuinely happy. The photograph is only of one part of the group of children so we don't know what the rest of the children were like ...read more.


However it is fiction which means it was made for entertainment and doesn't have any facts in it, it was written about 40 years after evacuation had taken place so the author can not be certain about events that took place and if it is meant for evidence about evacuees then does this story give an account of what all evacuees went through? I don't think this source is reliable for information about evacuees as it was written along time after the event, it is fiction not fact and it doesn't give a true impression of what all evacuees went through. 3. "Evacuation was a great success". Some people agree with this statement others do not. The main aim of evacuation was to take children to a safer place away from the bombing to reduce the amount of possible deaths. Evacuation can be seen as both a success and as a failure. It was a success as its aim was to remove children form possible, danger it achieved this by re-homing them in places such as the countryside, away from where the bombing was taking place. ...read more.


Also some of the foster parents just did it for the money and didn't bother to look after the children properly. Another example of pore organisation was the fact that the children were split from their families, their siblings would often be on the other side of the countryside and the children may have never seen their families again. Some of the foster parents had not been prepared for the state in which the evacuees were. They were shocked at the state they were in and didn't know how to cope. Two examples of this are source E and source F. The quote from source E "filthy habit of the children" and the quote from source F "common view of evacuees" show how the children were perceived as filthy, dirty and horrid children. As a conclusion to this, I don't think evacuation was a great success as they did not achieve a lot of what they wanted to achieve, a lot of the children had bad experiences, it was poorly organised and many of the foster parents didn't care about how they treated their children. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Developmental Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Developmental Psychology essays

  1. History - Evacuation

    At the start of the evacuation period, children were told that they were going to 'a holiday' and most children were happy enough to comply. But when these children were taken to be chosen and then moved into new houses and different cultures, the sense of suffering on their part began.

  2. Britain in the second World War: the Evacuation of British Children

    This was all very odd. I didn't like it. it was scary." This shows that even though this person was now living in better conditions, they were not happy were they were and they would rather be home. I think it depended on your host. If you liked them, then you would likely enjoy yourself.

  1. The idea for my coursework is the potential changing aspirations of teenage girls in ...

    The girls I interviewed in the mid 1980's were either unaware or embarrassed to talk about sex openly. They still saw marriage as eventually inevitable, though cohabitation before marriage was preferred by a number of girls.' ' Girls are realistic about the constrictions of.

  2. Which Source Is The More Useful As Evidence About The Start of The Children's ...

    I think that source C is the most useful, because it is quite possible that B is a piece of government propaganda, on the other hand C is definitely not propaganda as it was taken in 1988, and unlike a picture it describes how the children were feeling and behaving,

  1. Why do sources A to E differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    The advertisement is a piece of propaganda and the main message it conveys is that people would be helping if they put their names forward to become foster parents. This source is useful because it tells us that 20,000 people in Scotland have been looking after evacuated children.

  2. Britain in the Second World War: The Evacuation of British Children.

    There were mixed experiences for the children who were evacuated. Some were very happy, helping on the farms and eating better than they had ever done. This also affects the fosterers in the country whose job it was to look after the children when they moved to the country.

  1. Britain in the Second World War: The evacuation of British children.

    All men between 18 and 40 had to fight except a few who were exempt as they had certain specialised occupations and were needed in them. So, with the children gone the parents could really help out. Other reasons were for the children themselves.

  2. "Working conditions were terrible in 19th century Britain." Does the evidence support this view?

    In 1851 there were 30,000 street sellers on the streets of London. Most were children, some as young as six, not many women or men worked in the street selling trade though. There was a variety of street sellers, some sold bread and pies, while others offered services.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work