• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Case Studies relating to the Multi Store Model of Memory.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Case Studies The multi store model is the process of long term and short term memory. It explains what each type of memory is. Short term memory is memories which are less important, while Long term memory is memories which are very important. In a case study, nearly every aspect of the person's life and history is analyzed to search for patterns and causes for behaviour. The hope is that learning gained from studying one case can be generalized to many others. On the other hand, laboratory experiments are carried out in a laboratory where variables are controlled. Therefore it does not apply to the real world, which means that it has a low ecological validity. The case studies relating to the multi-store model are Clive Wearing and HM case studies. Clive Wearing contracted a virus in 1985; the virus attacked an area of the brain crucial for memory, which left him, leaving with amnesia. He has no memory of any event or memory in his life. Clive Wearing can remember: - * his wife not his children or any other family members * how to play the piano - but he is unaware of it * key numbers and names ...read more.

Middle

A case study is a study of a individual therefore it will be about that individual only however, the information found from one case study can be used to find out information about another case study which is similar to that case study. For example - the case study of Clive Wearing and HM are similar because they are both related to the multi store model therefore both case studies can be used to collect more information. Case studies can be trusted because it is a study of a individual therefore they will know what's happened to them and other information which makes the findings useful and trustworthy. The laboratory experiments which have been conducted have supported the multi store model because the cause and effect can be determined and that there is good control over the variables. The experiments I have looked at are the experiments carried out by Glanzer and Cunitz, and by Sperling. Sperling's experiment consisted of three rows with four letters in each row, he presented this to a group of participants for fifty milliseconds. After the participants were asked to report as many letters from the display as they could. ...read more.

Conclusion

As the experiment takes place in a laboratory, the experiment does not relate to the variables that exist in the real world which shows the lack of external validity. The experimenter creates a artificial nature to give the participants a feeling of the environment which the experiment is related to. Laboratory experiments can be tested again in the future to make sure the data found before were correct and to add further information to it; however, as the participants are told what the experimenter is experimenting for they might try to please the experimenter (demand characteristics). This means that the results are likely to be biased. In conclusion, I agree that case studies provide better evidence for the multi-store model than laboratory experiments because they have a high ecological validity and provide a detailed article of how the individual felt, what caused the individual problems, where it happened, what was affected and other information. Laboratory experiments have a low ecological validity therefore it does not relate to the real world. Also the artificial nature the experiment is carried out in, the environment is made up which means that it doesn't relate to real life. This means that case studies provide better evidence for the multi-store model. ?? ?? ?? ?? 18-10-2010 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. SHORT TERM MEMORY

    By 30 seconds, the word list has all been read out. The 10 words were read out again at the same pace, and altogether, 60 seconds was used in calling out the words. The stopwatch was stopped after the words were all called out.

  2. Primacy and Recency effect

    participant number 2, participant number 19 e.t.c. so that nobody was aware whose results were whose. The participants were notified before the experiment that they had the right to withdraw from the experiment if they insisted at any time during or before stating the experiment. Specifically in the debrief the participants were told specifically that they had the right to withdraw their results (see appendix 3)

  1. Psychology Retrospective Interference coursework

    6 Participant 27 6 Participant 8 10 Participant 18 3 Participant 28 7 Participant 9 9 Participant 19 5 Participant 29 9 Participant 10 8 Participant 20 4 Participant 30 6 Calculations of Mean, Mode, Median, and Standard Deviation Participant Scores of Resting condition Mean-score Mean-Score squared Participant Scores of

  2. Investigating the short-term memory

    It can also be noted that the words on the list are too similar sounding which could be why participants of the 2nd condition still managed to score high recalls. Another weakness of the research is that the results obtained are of too a widely spread of data for example

  1. Investigate into the Primacy and Recency effect

    It is therefore clear to see that if rehearsal is taken away, as it is through an interference task, then there will be no recency effect. Experimental hypothesis If given a list of words to remember, involving an interference task, when recalled there will be a strong primacy effect, and little, if no recency effect.

  2. The effect of primacy and recency on recall

    group B's findings suggested that the recency effect disappears if individuals are distracted. The researchers reasoned that this was because information in the STM is in a delicate state and can easily be displaced by other incoming information. A similar study was conducted by Murdock (1962)

  1. Outline and Evaluate the Multi Store Model of Memory and One Alternative Model

    Whilst half the participants were informed they would be required to recall the words afterwards (the intentional learning group) the other half were unaware (the incidental learning group). The control group of participants learnt the words without performing any of the orienteering tasks (this was to compare with the results

  2. Psychology Report

    Items from the beginning of the list were recalled quite well relative to those in the middle ( the primary effect), but not as well as those at the end.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work