Part of The Student Room Group

  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Case Studies relating to the Multi Store Model of Memory.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Case Studies The multi store model is the process of long term and short term memory. It explains what each type of memory is. Short term memory is memories which are less important, while Long term memory is memories which are very important. In a case study, nearly every aspect of the person's life and history is analyzed to search for patterns and causes for behaviour. The hope is that learning gained from studying one case can be generalized to many others. On the other hand, laboratory experiments are carried out in a laboratory where variables are controlled. Therefore it does not apply to the real world, which means that it has a low ecological validity. The case studies relating to the multi-store model are Clive Wearing and HM case studies. Clive Wearing contracted a virus in 1985; the virus attacked an area of the brain crucial for memory, which left him, leaving with amnesia. He has no memory of any event or memory in his life. Clive Wearing can remember: - * his wife not his children or any other family members * how to play the piano - but he is unaware of it * key numbers and names ...read more.

Middle

A case study is a study of a individual therefore it will be about that individual only however, the information found from one case study can be used to find out information about another case study which is similar to that case study. For example - the case study of Clive Wearing and HM are similar because they are both related to the multi store model therefore both case studies can be used to collect more information. Case studies can be trusted because it is a study of a individual therefore they will know what's happened to them and other information which makes the findings useful and trustworthy. The laboratory experiments which have been conducted have supported the multi store model because the cause and effect can be determined and that there is good control over the variables. The experiments I have looked at are the experiments carried out by Glanzer and Cunitz, and by Sperling. Sperling's experiment consisted of three rows with four letters in each row, he presented this to a group of participants for fifty milliseconds. After the participants were asked to report as many letters from the display as they could. ...read more.

Conclusion

As the experiment takes place in a laboratory, the experiment does not relate to the variables that exist in the real world which shows the lack of external validity. The experimenter creates a artificial nature to give the participants a feeling of the environment which the experiment is related to. Laboratory experiments can be tested again in the future to make sure the data found before were correct and to add further information to it; however, as the participants are told what the experimenter is experimenting for they might try to please the experimenter (demand characteristics). This means that the results are likely to be biased. In conclusion, I agree that case studies provide better evidence for the multi-store model than laboratory experiments because they have a high ecological validity and provide a detailed article of how the individual felt, what caused the individual problems, where it happened, what was affected and other information. Laboratory experiments have a low ecological validity therefore it does not relate to the real world. Also the artificial nature the experiment is carried out in, the environment is made up which means that it doesn't relate to real life. This means that case studies provide better evidence for the multi-store model. ?? ?? ?? ?? 18-10-2010 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

or


Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. SHORT TERM MEMORY

    By 30 seconds, the word list has all been read out. The 10 words were read out again at the same pace, and altogether, 60 seconds was used in calling out the words. The stopwatch was stopped after the words were all called out.

  2. Investigate into the Primacy and Recency effect

    This test was chosen as, firstly the investigation was of an independent measures design, as different participants were used in each condition. In addition the investigation was looking for a difference in the recency effect from the two conditions. The value of both N1 and N2 was 20 (number of participants in each condition).

  1. Primacy and Recency effect

    as the other words as longer words might take more space than shorter words. Another extraneous variable that was controlled in the experiment was any participants having the knowledge of psychology were not used in this experiment. This was due to the fact that they might cause demand characteristics as

  2. Investigating the short-term memory

    Overall these added would help give a better conclusion for forgetting and how different factors like age affect it. REFRENCES TEXT BOOKS Pennington, D (2000) 'Introducing Psychology', Hodder Arnold, Oxon. WEBSITES www.wikipedia.org/atkinson&shiffrin www.wikipedia.org/alanbaddeley APPENDIXES APPENDIX 1 Working out of averages for Group 1 Mean Male > 8 + 8 +

  1. Outline and Evaluate the Multi Store Model of Memory and One Alternative Model

    from the other two groups to demonstrate the effects of the experiment). Hyde and Jenkins tested the participants' recall of the original 24 words, finding that the differences between the intentional and incidental learning groups were minimal- indicating that the results were not affected by knowing whether or not recall would be required after hearing the words.

  2. Psychology Report

    Poorest recall for those in the middle. However, for participants who recalled the distracter task, this prevented rehearsal of words, so the recency effect disappeared. The primary effect was unaffected. Recency effect demonstrates recall from STM, primary effect demonstrates recall from LTM.

  1. Psychology Retrospective Interference coursework

    Debrief by saying, "You have just participated in a psychological experiment on forgetting in long-term memory. This experiment examines on retro-interference theory which indicates that later memories disrupt earlier memories. After learning the original list of adjectives, the participants were divided into three conditions in this experiment.

  2. An experiment to support the assumption that there are two distinct memory stores in ...

    The dependent variable was how many words the participants recalled in the list. Counterbalancing was used to control the order effects by changing the position of the words in the 2nd group.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work