Commentary on the play "Stolen".

Authors Avatar

Commentary on the play “Stolen”

It is not difficult to understand the worries of a mother whose child goes missing for a day, but how about not seeing her child for twenty-six years? That seems so far-fetched, but yet it is also an incontrovertible chapter of Australian history. From 1910 until 1970s, the Australian government carried out an assimilation policy, under which Aboriginal children, referred as the “Stolen Generation”, were brutally removed from their aboriginal family and taken to children homes, awaiting to be adapted by a white family. The idea of “assimilation” sounds promising, but beneath it are hidden countless of emotionally taxing stories, families broken apart, hopeless victims put a period to their lives.

Jane Harrison tasted it all, as she herself is one of the stolen children. Being a victim

under the policy, she knows clearly what cruelty the policy had to offer. Therefore she wrote the play “Stolen” which tells of five Aboriginal children in Cranby Children’s Home, who were stolen from their families. Through writing the hardship that the five characters have gone through, Harrison reveals the devastation of the policy caused to her people. I shall investigate her criticism by exploring three of the characters’ experiences.

Join now!

Ruby is the aboriginal girl who is both physically and sexually abused by white people and ends up in a mental institute. All her life she longs for her family, yet when they finally come and visit her, she has already descended into madness and no longer able to recognize them. In the scene “cleaning routine 2”, Ruby asked sarcastically what the aboriginal children can be when they grown up. In unison the children sing to the tune of “We are happy little vegemites” --- “we love to work like slaves, we all adore to work like slaves”. Through ...

This is a preview of the whole essay