'Compare and contrast the contribution that behaviourist and psychodynamic theories have made to our understanding of the psychology of human behaviour'.

Authors Avatar

Andrew Ogden

Psychology

Page

‘Compare and contrast the contribution that behaviourist and

psychodynamic theories have made to our understanding of the psychology of human behaviour’.

This essay is going to discuss the behaviourist and psychodynamic theories that exist and the arguments for and against them. The behaviourist theory was first introduced by Watson (1913) in what was later to be known as the ‘Methodological’ form and then redefined by Skinner in the ‘Radical’ form. The psychodynamic theory was originally introduced by Freud (1900). The modern day psychodynamic approach is largely based on Freud’s theories but do include the theories of people such as Jung, Adler and Erikson whose theories are based on Freud’s but are not identical. The way I have decided to structure this essay is to describe each theory separately, starting off with a brief history followed by an account of their theories and how they have contributed to modern day psychology. I shall then make my comparisons between the two theories and finally conclude by mentioning some of the criticism aimed at these theories.

Behaviourism was born when the introspective theory (observing and analysing the structure of conscious mental processes) validity and usefulness was being seriously questioned. The main person doing this questioning was an American psychologist, John B. Watson.

Watson (1913) proposed that psychologists should only study behaviour because it is the only thing that is measurable and observable by more than one person.

Watson knew that for psychology to be accepted as scientific that it would have to imitate the natural sciences and adopt its own objective methods. Watson’s own definition of psychology was:

‘… that division of Natural Science which takes human behaviour – the doings and sayings, both learned and unlearned – as its subject matter’

(Watson, 1919 in Gross, R & McIlveen, R 1998).

Therefore the study of inaccessible, private and mental processes was to have no place in a truly scientific psychology.

Watson was waiting to totally transform the very subject matter of psychology from ‘mind’ to behaviour. This is often referred to as methodological behaviourism.

Skinner (1987) defined this as,

“ Methodological’ behaviourists often accept the existence of feelings and states of mind, but do not deal with them because they are not public and hence statements about them are not subject to confirmation by more than one person…’.

Join now!

However, in contrast to this, Skinner (1987) asserts:

‘…’Radical’ behaviourists… recognise the role of private events (accessible in varying degrees to self-observation and physiological research), but contend that so-called mental activities are metaphors or explanatory fictions and that behaviour attributed to them can be more effectively explained in other ways…’.

Skinner found that for him, these more effective explanations of behaviour come in the form of the principles of reinforcement derived from his experimental work with rats and pigeons.

Skinner used a type of puzzle box known as a Skinner box. The box has a lever (in the case of ...

This is a preview of the whole essay