Compare and evaluate two models said to describe the structure of memory.

Authors Avatar

Compare and evaluate two models said to describe the structure of memory.

Colin Crumpler, 191318, 30/10/02

        The short and long term memory stores are what most reflect upon when talking about the memory, yet the structure of the memory has proved to be more complex than originally thought.  There have been a few different models for the structure of the memory suggested including the multi-store model (Atkinson and Shiffrin, 1968), the working memory model (Baddeley and Hitch, 1974) and the connectionist model (Anderson, 1983; Collins and Loftus, 1975).  The two that will be concentrated on however will be the multi-store and working memory model, as these are the most influential models used so therefore will be the most relevant to discuss.  The two models will be discussed in turn and will follow by an examination of the differences between the two, concluding in the uses of the models.

        The first model of the structure of the memory to be looked at is the Atkinson – Shiffron Model (1968), also known as the ‘modal model’.  There are 3 main parts of the Atkinson – Shiffron model; first the sensory register, the short term memory and the long-term memory, and each have their own specific jobs to attend to.

        The sensory register (sensory memory) is where all the information from the senses (sound, touch, taste, smell and sight) is collected, and is then sorted for its importance.  Everything that we receive through our senses goes into the sensory register and then is either manually selected by ourselves or non-intentionally moved into the short term memory, where it is stored for longer and can be used further.  The information received is known to be ‘modality specific’; this means that the information received through the senses is sensitive to the sense in use.  For example if two visual stimuli have been received within short succession, the chance of the first one being stored in the sensory register is decreased and the information may be lost.  If however the second stimulus is sound or taste for example then both the visual and sound stimuli have a greater chance of being stored.

Join now!

        Experiments have shown that the sensory register holds information for up to 50 milliseconds (Sperling, 1960).  His experiment used arrays of letters (12 letters in total) and a subject was exposed to these letters for 50 milliseconds, and then asked to recall as many as possible.  The subjects could only recall 4 or 5 of the letters and when presented with the letters for less than 50 milliseconds only on occasion were any letters recalled at all.  This then proved that the sensory memory register needs 50milliseconds at least for information to be taken in and used, this process is ...

This is a preview of the whole essay