• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare, Contrast and Evaluate the Nativist and Empiricist Views of Infant Perception

Extracts from this document...


Compare, Contrast and Evaluate the Nativist and Empiricist Views of Infant Perception Before going on to discuss the differing nativist and empiricist viewpoints, it is important to firstly establish what is meant by the terms 'infant' and 'perception'. Infancy can be described as the period from birth to 24 months of age. Perception refers to the brain's interpretation of the various sensory inputs it receives from the environment, such as light, sound, smell, touch and taste, and allows us to achieve an understanding about the world around us. The question of whether our basic perceptual understanding of the world is in-built and present from birth, or develops as a result of learning and experience, has been of much debate. Nativists hold the former view, that many perceptual abilities are present at birth. In contrast, empiricists take the latter position, arguing that there is a minimum level of experience necessary to support the development of the perceptual systems. Therefore both perspectives agree that development occurs subsequent to birth, but disagree on how much capability is present at birth. This essay will examine, using studies to gain insight, the evidence for each viewpoint. Infants cannot tell us what they can see, hear and discriminate; therefore this information has to be inferred from their behaviour. Researchers have devised several subtle techniques that allow us to measure infants' perceptual abilities, including the preference technique, study of the processes of habituation and dishabitiuation, and the use of the principles of conditioning. The preference technique involves presenting infants with two different stimuli (pictures or objects), and measuring how long they look at each. ...read more.


was shown to the infant. It was found that 3- and 4- month-old children showed renewed interest to the figure showing a different pattern, but not to the figure showing the same pattern. The rationale behind their study comes from research on what infants look at - in the first two months of life, most visual attention is devoted to where objects are in the infant's environment. When an object is located, searching stops and the edge of that object is scanned. At two to three months of age, however, there appears to be shift from the focus on where an object is, to what an object is. At this stage, entire objects, rather than just their edges, are scanned by infants - more time is spent looking at the internal features of objects and patterns are noticed. This progression through stages, however, provides support for the empiricist perspective. Infants also possess the ability to recognise and discriminate between more complex patterns, such as faces. Fantz (1961, cited in Smith, Cowie & Blades, 2003) showed infants three stimuli based on a face - one with features arranged correctly, one with jumbled up facial features and a control with the same overall brightness as the other two (containing no facial features but a black/white contrast). Infants from a few days old up to six months of age were tested, and it was found in all cases that the longest time was spent looking at the correct facial arrangement, somewhat less time spent looking at the jumbled up face, and considerably less time spent looking at the control. ...read more.


Meltzoff and Borton (1979, cited in Bee, 2000) gave four-week old babies a dummy with either a smooth, or knobbly surface to suck on. On presentation of pictures of these different dummies, it was found that the infants preferred to look at the picture of the dummy they had previously sucked on. The above research suggests that there may be some innate connections (not all young infants are capable of such linkage of senses), with experience of specific objects and combinations aiding this process of intermodal perception. To sum up, it is clear that infants are, even before birth, armed with a number of perceptual capabilities. Visual perception, although initially not of the same quality as adults, is sufficient and rapidly improves, and auditory perception is remarkably accurate even before birth. Infants are also capable of combining sensory information from a young age, with depth perception developing a little later (some say three months, others say six). We have discussed many arguments for both the nativist and empiricist perspectives; the presence of visual and auditory discrimination from birth (or prior to birth in the case of auditory perception) gives a strong case for the nativist perspective. The empiricist viewpoint can be supported by evidence showing the later onset of depth perception, and improvement of vision, and the effects of environmental deprivation on the senses. In conclusion, a combination of both the influence of learning and biological preparedness is perhaps the best, most informative option to take. It can be suggested that infants are born with the tools needed to make, for example, visual discriminations, but that the environment shapes the specific discriminations learnt - the basic system adapts to the specific environment of the infant. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Developmental Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Developmental Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Behaviourist Perspective

    3 star(s)

    Children at any early age who tend to fail to learn skills that they need, for example, social and emotional skills, tend to be aggressive and tend to have not learned to control destructive feelings'.

  2. Investigate the stages that infants go through when developing attachments.

    This method was favoured as it gave them maximum control over variables, meaning the results had high reliability but low ecological validity. They also believed that what applied to animals also applied to humans, so most of their research was carried out on animals: rats, cats and dogs.

  1. Levels Of Processing

    The actual sample experimented on were 20 16-17 year old students, 9 females and 11 males. Participants were assigned to the conditions randomly; in this case every other participant was given a different word list (visual or semantic). Apparatus/materials The materials consisted of two questionnaires including word lists with 10

  2. A2 perceptual thoeries

    Studies of perceptual adaptation/readjustment demonstrate the flexibility of human perception although it is not always clear whether the adaptation is perceptual or motor.

  1. Psychology Cae Studies

    Do we follow each other? Does the laboratory accurately reflect what occurs in real life? Will results stay the same once we move from the laboratory to real life? Do laboratory concepts actually exist? What this study demonstrated is that even though laboratory concepts may be reliable they may not

  2. How has the use of new research methods contributed to a greater understanding of ...

    Fantz reasoned that visual fixation duration for one stimulus over another was affirmation that babies can perceive a difference. His studies confirmed that infants have reasonably acute pattern vision and a preference for 'face type' stimuli (Fantz 1962). Further testing on younger subjects of 10 hours old suggested that these abilities are innate (Fantz 1963).

  1. Investigaiting the aquisition of numerical ability

    a number she was able to select the number nine and build a tower of cubes independently. This child is able to recognise small numbers without counting but just by looking otherwise known as subitising the recognition of number symbols.

  2. "Estimation improves with age".

    Line Estimation Children Adult Lower Quartile (Q1) 45 49.25 Upper Quartile (Q3) 59 55.75 Inter-Quartile Range 14 6.5 Angle Estimation Children Adult Lower Quartile (Q1) 45 45 Upper Quartile (Q3) 53 55.25 Inter-Quartile Range 8 10.25 The IQR results show that overall the Adults are better at estimating length of the line, due the IQR being smaller

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work