• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Conformity and Obedience

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann stood trial in 1961 for his part in the execution of thousands of Jews in the Holocaust. His defence was that he was 'only obeying orders'. This prompted Stanley Milgram a psychological researcher at Yale University to conduct a laboratory experiment on 'Obedience to authority'. His hypothesis 'are Germans different'. Milgram's obedience studies were: "probably the most disturbing, most discussed, most critised and most notorious in the history of psychology" (McGhee, 2001) The experiment took place at the prestigious Yale University, forty participants were selected from replies to a newspaper advertisement offering $4 for an hours work to take part in an experiment on the effects of 'punishment and learning' they were also informed they were free to leave at any time. The real reason for the experiment was kept from the participants as this would have led to demand characteristics. The experiment went ahead and in turn each participant was greeted by a White coated researcher and another man Mr Wallace, unbeknown to the participant Mr Wallace was a confederate. The experiment required one of the men to be a learner and one a teacher, lots were drawn but rigged by the researcher so the learner was always Mr Wallace and the teacher the real subject. ...read more.

Middle

It is important to note that Milgram couldn't have predicted that outcome before the experiment as he didn't know them and he didn't conduct any research on the participants background before the experiment. One of the fiercest critics of Milgram's work was Baumrind (1964) claiming the experiment lacked ecological validity as the laboratory setting was too artificial, also the unfamiliar setting caused uncertainty in the participants which in turn would lead to more obedience. The claim that the laboratory setting and lack of realism influenced the results was shown to be incorrect when an experiment was conducted at a real hospital by Hofling et al(1966). A doctor who was a confederate spoke by telephone to a nurse and asked her to issue double the recommended dose of a drug to a patient, the doctor then stated he would sign the relevant papers later. Although this was strictly against hospital rules twenty one out of the twenty two nurses asked were ready to administer the medication without questioning the doctor. This illustrates how obedience in easily found in real life situations and establishments. It is however the social norm of nurses to issue drugs to a patient and at the time of the experiment they would have felt uncomfortable to question a doctors authority. ...read more.

Conclusion

He was a pioneer in conducting experiments on obedience and his work moved the study of Psychology further forward, as well as this he influenced others to conduct further experiments. The experiment also prompted many discussions on ethics and in 1978 ethical guidelines were introduced for research on human subjects. Researchers now have to have informed consent and explain in full the purpose of the experiment and the hypothesis. Identities must also remain confidential. Ironically the discussions on ethics bought about by Milgram's experiments are now used against him to criticise him and his work. The experiment whilst providing valuable information on obedience rejected his original hypothesis as Germans are no different to anybody else as Milgrams and other studies have discovered that obedience to someone perceived to be in authority is high in many parts of the world. However there were other possible reasons why Eichmann could have acted the way he did, which couldn't be tested in experiments. He may have feared for his own life had he not obeyed the orders. Since birth humans are bought up to obey orders, to develop morals and do as we are told. It is an evolutionary mechanism so a stable society can be maintained and this makes it possible to be able to function in a hierarchical society. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "Describe the main features of conformity and obedience analyse two conformity and obedience studies ...

    He is introduced to a stern looking experimenter in a white coat and a rather pleasant and friendly co-subject. The experimenter explains that the experiment will look into the role of punishment in learning, and that one will be the "teacher" and one will be the "learner."

  2. Conformity & Obedience to Authority.

    or they would press the button for a lesser shock than they ought to. * Another important factor emerged. On a number of occasions the experimenter was asked if he would accept responsibility for what happened, and he was scripted to say yes.

  1. The Concepts Of Conformity And Obedience

    24 male college students, found to be all mentally sound when tested and with no criminal record, were selected. Each student was paid $15 per day. The volunteers were divided into two groups, prisoners and guards. This was determined by simply flipping a coin.

  2. Were Milgram and Zimbardo unethical?

    Minority influence A minority group can also strongly influence an individual, this is more likely when the minority are the 'in group', possibly due to social status or age, or they are acting out of principle and have made personal sacrifices in the pursuit of their beliefs.

  1. The Matching Hypothesis

    Whilst finding the pictures of real couples we used many websites and their 'success stories' section. However no actual proof or real data was displayed. We had to believe that the couples were genuine. However there is a possibility that the dating agency/company could have hired 2 random people or

  2. Psychology Questions Ansewered

    In this instance pictorial perception was different. Differences in perception doesn't have to be inter-cultural, it can be intra-cultural all you need is different experiences. These experiences impact upon how individuals perceive the world. The persons who were referred to in Deregowski's study were not from a Western culture so they had different experiences than Western persons.

  1. Investigation into Whether Gender Affects Conformity

    Asch and other psychologists have also performed variations on his original experiment. Morris and Miller (1975) and Asch found that levels of conformity dropped dramatically when one other participant dissented from the majority to support the na�ve participant. Morris and Miller found that when the dissenter's judgement was heard at

  2. Using research evidence, explain conformity and obedience

    The seating was arranged so that the 'real' participant was the last one to answer. A second group was tasked with taking the test individually. The results of the test showed that on 32% of tests in which the participants had given the wrong answer, the 'real' participant had agreed with them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work