• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Conformity and Obedience

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann stood trial in 1961 for his part in the execution of thousands of Jews in the Holocaust. His defence was that he was 'only obeying orders'. This prompted Stanley Milgram a psychological researcher at Yale University to conduct a laboratory experiment on 'Obedience to authority'. His hypothesis 'are Germans different'. Milgram's obedience studies were: "probably the most disturbing, most discussed, most critised and most notorious in the history of psychology" (McGhee, 2001) The experiment took place at the prestigious Yale University, forty participants were selected from replies to a newspaper advertisement offering $4 for an hours work to take part in an experiment on the effects of 'punishment and learning' they were also informed they were free to leave at any time. The real reason for the experiment was kept from the participants as this would have led to demand characteristics. The experiment went ahead and in turn each participant was greeted by a White coated researcher and another man Mr Wallace, unbeknown to the participant Mr Wallace was a confederate. The experiment required one of the men to be a learner and one a teacher, lots were drawn but rigged by the researcher so the learner was always Mr Wallace and the teacher the real subject. ...read more.

Middle

It is important to note that Milgram couldn't have predicted that outcome before the experiment as he didn't know them and he didn't conduct any research on the participants background before the experiment. One of the fiercest critics of Milgram's work was Baumrind (1964) claiming the experiment lacked ecological validity as the laboratory setting was too artificial, also the unfamiliar setting caused uncertainty in the participants which in turn would lead to more obedience. The claim that the laboratory setting and lack of realism influenced the results was shown to be incorrect when an experiment was conducted at a real hospital by Hofling et al(1966). A doctor who was a confederate spoke by telephone to a nurse and asked her to issue double the recommended dose of a drug to a patient, the doctor then stated he would sign the relevant papers later. Although this was strictly against hospital rules twenty one out of the twenty two nurses asked were ready to administer the medication without questioning the doctor. This illustrates how obedience in easily found in real life situations and establishments. It is however the social norm of nurses to issue drugs to a patient and at the time of the experiment they would have felt uncomfortable to question a doctors authority. ...read more.

Conclusion

He was a pioneer in conducting experiments on obedience and his work moved the study of Psychology further forward, as well as this he influenced others to conduct further experiments. The experiment also prompted many discussions on ethics and in 1978 ethical guidelines were introduced for research on human subjects. Researchers now have to have informed consent and explain in full the purpose of the experiment and the hypothesis. Identities must also remain confidential. Ironically the discussions on ethics bought about by Milgram's experiments are now used against him to criticise him and his work. The experiment whilst providing valuable information on obedience rejected his original hypothesis as Germans are no different to anybody else as Milgrams and other studies have discovered that obedience to someone perceived to be in authority is high in many parts of the world. However there were other possible reasons why Eichmann could have acted the way he did, which couldn't be tested in experiments. He may have feared for his own life had he not obeyed the orders. Since birth humans are bought up to obey orders, to develop morals and do as we are told. It is an evolutionary mechanism so a stable society can be maintained and this makes it possible to be able to function in a hierarchical society. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "Describe the main features of conformity and obedience analyse two conformity and obedience studies ...

    You will see them as higher class people and will want to be respectful and follow their orders. A great example of this is that within Milgram's study it was found that people were more likely to obey if the person in charge was looked more professional or more important,

  2. Conformity & Obedience to Authority.

    * A third factor was the presence of the experimenter in his lab coat. Milgram repeated the experiment and in situations where he left the room and issued instructions via the telephone the obedience level dropped to almost zero. In these cases the participant would pretend to press the button

  1. The Concepts Of Conformity And Obedience

    carried out at Stanford University. Zimbardo recruited male participants through a newspaper advertisement asking for student volunteers to participate in a two-week prison experiment. The aim of the experiment was to see the psychological effects of making an average person into a prisoner or guard.

  2. The Matching Hypothesis

    Whilst finding the pictures of real couples we used many websites and their 'success stories' section. However no actual proof or real data was displayed. We had to believe that the couples were genuine. However there is a possibility that the dating agency/company could have hired 2 random people or

  1. Were Milgram and Zimbardo unethical?

    This may be a membership group (family or peers), or it may be a reference group (pop or sports stars). This group can be either a majority or a minority group. Why people conform Two main processes have been identified in causing people to conform: Normative influence: This type of influence often comes from peer pressure.

  2. Psychology Questions Ansewered

    The eyewitness testimony study demonstrated problems that can occur because of the method humans choose to recall information. Often times we are called upon to retrieve information after a period of time has elapsed. In order to recollect we rely upon memory cues such as pictures, words or even smell to aid our memory.

  1. Investigation into Whether Gender Affects Conformity

    been instructed to the wrong answer unanimously on 12 out of 18 trials. The na�ve participant was seated so that they gave their opinion second to last out of the whole group. The results of Asch's experiment were that on 32% of the critical trials the na�ve participant conformed to

  2. Comparing Experiments into Obedience and Conformity

    failed to memorise the words. If the teacher hesitated to administer the shock then the researcher would persuade the participant to continue and told them that they are fully responsible for any harm, this was even more believable to the genuine participant as the researchers and Milgram wore a white lab coat as an authority symbol.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work