• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Conformity- Testing Asch Results

Extracts from this document...


Contents Abstract 2 Introduction 3 Aim and Hypothesis 3 Methodology 4 Results 5 Discussion 7 References 8 Appendix Contents 9 Abstract: This research aimed to find out if people conformed due to normative influences or informational influences. An opportunity sample of 15 participants, 8 males and 7 females aged between 16 and 19 years, studying at Fullbrook Sixth Form. A lab experiment was used where the participants were also interviewed at the end of the experiment. The results showed that there is a difference in the number of times people conform when in a group compared to a control where they were tested individually. The answers from the interviews suggest that the people conformed because they wanted to fit in (normative influences.) The Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test showed that the results are significant because the calculated value for W (-120) is less than the expected value (30) at a 0.05 level of significance for a one tailed test as a result the experimental hypothesis is supported. Introduction: In a group we find ourselves in the minority occasionally. Generally we seek groups with interests similar to our own. ...read more.


The participant saw the picture and was asked a question (see appendix 1). The participants had to say the answer out aloud. The 'real' participant was the last person to say his answer so that he could hear the confederate's answers first. However he was told this was because he was seated at the end. The answer was recorded by the experimenter. Then they moved on to the next question. After 2 questions the confederates all gave the same incorrect answer. The experimenter carried on writing the participants' response to see if he conformed. This was repeated until all 10 cards were shown and the responses were written. After this the participant was interviewed where the key question was why the participant changed the answer. After this the participant was debriefed. (see appendix 3) Controls: * Location (See Appendix 6) * Standardised instructions (see appendix 1) * Questions on main test (see appendix 1) * Experimenter (Sairah Ahmed) * Debrief (see appendix 3) * Ethics: Although the participants were not told the true aim of the experiment at the start, when the experiment finished they were debriefed (see appendix 3). ...read more.


This makes the results hard to generalise as it may only be that specific age group who conform more readily. To improve the experiment, a larger sample needs to be used which includes people of different ages for example the general public. It may be that older people may be more confident about giving the correct answer. Also the participants were around the common room and study room and so this restricts the type of people being studied. To improve on this many locations could have been used such as the canteen or outside of school. Another weakness is that fellow students may have wished to help my research and so be subject to demand characteristics. When Crutchfield did his experiment he found that participants did not want to spoil the results and so they agreed with the incorrect answer. This could have been the case in my experiment because the people I was testing were a part of the school I attend and so they wanted to make sure that I get the results I expected. Another reason as to why the participants conformed could be that they saw the experimenter as being in charge and so they behaved mindlessly because they thought that the experimenter would step in if there was an absurd answer. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Describe and Evaluate Studies on Conformity. (Key study Solomon Asch)

    5 star(s)

    This suggests that many people engage in public compliance rather then private acceptance. Conformity therefore does no necessarily mean agreement. Also, the research should be made broader not just to a particular sex as in his experiment he used male college students.

  2. The aim of this experiment is to find out if people will conform without ...

    (Appendix 3+4). Also used, was a computer to type up and print out all materials used making them clear and readable for the participants. Pens and a plain piece of paper for the control group to write their answers on were also provided.

  1. The matching hypothesis

    It seems socially acceptable for a female to say 'oh yeah she's pretty', however for a male to acknowledge another man's attractiveness would be frowned upon, in that they would be perceived as holding homosexual tendencies, or this may be due to them being oblivious to what woman find attractive in men.

  2. Matching Hypothesis

    The scatter graph did not show a positive correlation between males and female levels of physical appearance and does not support the hypothesis. Participants did not agree on levels of physical appearance in the couples, the standard deviation was large and shows a lot of disagreement between the participants.

  1. Psychology Questions Ansewered

    If you qualify it like that you will be okay. Thigpen and Cleckley interviews, psychometric testing, self reporting measures, second hand observation. Interviews the therapy session was an interview. Psychometric testing remember inkblot, iq test, and memory tests. Self report for this we again qualify it, hypnosis was used to gather information from eve about herself.

  2. The experiment conducted tested the theory of conformity under the influence of group pressure.

    However, the reactions to opinions and abilities differ because people cannot react to the two categories of beliefs in the same way. People can rank abilities on a scale from "good" to "bad." It is clear that a person must move toward the "good" direction on the ranking scale in order to improve.

  1. The Matching Hypothesis

    and also 20 males (10 single males and 10 from the real couples that the 10 females came from). When the images were collated we firstly labelled the 10 real couples, letters from A to J (see Appendix III). We then split the image of the couples so we ended up with 10 males and 10 females.

  2. Theories of Asch and Tajfel

    that are as foreign to us as the BBA's, we feel more comfortable working with IMML's because they have the same behavioural characteristics as us, as well as sharing common goals. Tajfel suggests that a reason for this is the need to treat the 'team's values as our own'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work