• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Could or should psychology be called a science?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Could or should psychology be called a science? Hannah Richards The advantages of calling psychology a science are huge. It allows us to state that it contains objective facts, correct our mistakes and build on previous discoveries. However many refute giving psychology the tile of 'a science' believing that humans are far too complex in their processes to be explained in generalised terms. The key assumptions of 'science' are; Invariance, in science a set of laws don't change, Determinism, meaning that everything can be explained using these laws and that there is a reason for everything and finally Operationalism, trusting in an objective and accurate set of measured variables. Many psychologists believe that these key principals conflict with those of human cognitions; which are often complex and seem to fail to follow any set rules of nature. People inevitably change over time; this fact challenges the principal of 'Invariance' from the scientific point of view. ...read more.

Middle

However science might say that you can infer the thoughts and feelings of a person from their external behaviour. Many psychologists would state that 'psychologies inability to predict human behaviour could be taken as proof that psychology isn't a science because science works on the principals that if you observe something enough times you will be able to understand it and predict what will happen in the future.' Science however, began like psychology; without all the answers and indeed even modern medical science cannot predict all the answers e.g. Modern medicinal science doesn't know how to cure cancer because they don't know how it will react to different drugs. We would demand a far more complex analysis from a psychologist than we would from other scientists. We might ask a psychologist what a human will do, this question could be considered as broad as asking a physicist what will happen to a specific drop of water in the ocean. ...read more.

Conclusion

If psychology became a science then humans would have to be tested upon to gain more accurate results and to create complex laws about them. These experiments might be unethical, for example we have seen the research that Milgram did, however even though it was controversial the participants agreed that they were unharmed and that they were glad to have participated. There would also be strict ethical guidelines should humans be tested on. Many psychologists believe that the reason psychology shouldn't be a science is due to the mysterious and uncertain nature of it. The fact that we don't understand 'love' might make it seem more magical and exciting, something that appeals to human nature. The advantages to understanding something like love would mean that we could prevent areas such as divorce, break up and heartbreak, causing a less painful world for humans. The complexity of areas of psychology, such as love and hate, means that inevitably the mystery and human mis-understanding surrounding such phenomena would be unlikely to be removed. ?? ?? ?? ?? - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level The Psychology of Individual Differences section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level The Psychology of Individual Differences essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Behavioural Study of Obedience - Stanley Milgram

    5 star(s)

    the experiment and by making them believe they are administering real electric shocks to a real subject. We would have to balance any criticisms with a consideration as to the necessity of deception. The main problem is one of demand characteristics, whereby if a subject knows the true purpose of an experiment, he might behave differently.

  2. Free essay

    Discuss the range of methods available to the psychologist.

    The observer takes detailed and accurate notes and recordings. An advantage of using this method is that the observer does not interfere with the environment in any way which gives a more realistic and accurate result. It is also high in ecological validity as it can be easily repeated and can generate clear results about how often behaviour occurs.

  1. Consider the Problems Faced by Psychologists in the Definition of Abnormality

    they work best and are using this knowledge in order to achieve their full potential. By resisting stress they will be deviation from the 1st and 2nd criteria, but will be complying with the 3rd criterion. By accepting stress they will be complying with the 1st and 2nd criteria, but will be deviating from the 3rd criterion.

  2. The Perils of Obedience, By Stanley Milgram

    As the voltage increases, his protests become more vehement and emotional. At 285 volts, his response can be described only as an agonized scream. Soon thereafter, he makes no sound at all. For the teacher, the situation quickly becomes one of gripping tension.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work