• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Could or should psychology be called a science?

Extracts from this document...


Could or should psychology be called a science? Hannah Richards The advantages of calling psychology a science are huge. It allows us to state that it contains objective facts, correct our mistakes and build on previous discoveries. However many refute giving psychology the tile of 'a science' believing that humans are far too complex in their processes to be explained in generalised terms. The key assumptions of 'science' are; Invariance, in science a set of laws don't change, Determinism, meaning that everything can be explained using these laws and that there is a reason for everything and finally Operationalism, trusting in an objective and accurate set of measured variables. Many psychologists believe that these key principals conflict with those of human cognitions; which are often complex and seem to fail to follow any set rules of nature. People inevitably change over time; this fact challenges the principal of 'Invariance' from the scientific point of view. ...read more.


However science might say that you can infer the thoughts and feelings of a person from their external behaviour. Many psychologists would state that 'psychologies inability to predict human behaviour could be taken as proof that psychology isn't a science because science works on the principals that if you observe something enough times you will be able to understand it and predict what will happen in the future.' Science however, began like psychology; without all the answers and indeed even modern medical science cannot predict all the answers e.g. Modern medicinal science doesn't know how to cure cancer because they don't know how it will react to different drugs. We would demand a far more complex analysis from a psychologist than we would from other scientists. We might ask a psychologist what a human will do, this question could be considered as broad as asking a physicist what will happen to a specific drop of water in the ocean. ...read more.


If psychology became a science then humans would have to be tested upon to gain more accurate results and to create complex laws about them. These experiments might be unethical, for example we have seen the research that Milgram did, however even though it was controversial the participants agreed that they were unharmed and that they were glad to have participated. There would also be strict ethical guidelines should humans be tested on. Many psychologists believe that the reason psychology shouldn't be a science is due to the mysterious and uncertain nature of it. The fact that we don't understand 'love' might make it seem more magical and exciting, something that appeals to human nature. The advantages to understanding something like love would mean that we could prevent areas such as divorce, break up and heartbreak, causing a less painful world for humans. The complexity of areas of psychology, such as love and hate, means that inevitably the mystery and human mis-understanding surrounding such phenomena would be unlikely to be removed. ?? ?? ?? ?? - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level The Psychology of Individual Differences section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level The Psychology of Individual Differences essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Behavioural Study of Obedience - Stanley Milgram

    5 star(s)

    Nisbett provides evidence to suggest we view the actions of others as though they are guided by their disposition; yet we view our own actions as being the result of the situation we were in. The main conclusion, however, simply is that people tend to obey others in authority.

  2. The Perils of Obedience, By Stanley Milgram

    It is not a game for him: conflict is intense obvious. The manifest suffering of the learner presses him to quit: but each time he hesitates to administer a shock, the experimenter orders him to continue. To extricate himself from this plight, the subject must make a clear break with authority.

  1. Free essay

    Discuss the range of methods available to the psychologist.

    The observational method is a standardized approach and consists of planned watching, recording and analysing observed behaviour as it happens within some setting. There are two types of observational methods. These are the naturalistic and controlled observation. The naturalistic observation observes the participants in a natural environment.

  2. Consider the Problems Faced by Psychologists in the Definition of Abnormality

    In Western culture, someone who was hearing voices or talking to a dead relative would be seen as abnormal and would be thought to have a psychological disorder. In other cultures it is normal to continually talk to those who have passed on, as they remain with the family in spirit.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work