• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically evaluate research concerned with decision making in groups. Give attention to minority and majority group influences

Extracts from this document...


Critically evaluate research concerned with decision making in groups. Give attention to minority and majority group influences Lewin (1948) states the definition of a group was "a dynamic whole based on interdependence", and Newcomb (1957), "Shared norms and interlocking roles". Both definitions share two common features of norms and independence. This suggests that a group works around some form of 'normality' and 'mutuality' and therefore it is presumptuous that group decision-making would show apparent signs of 'mutual' agreement and 'normal' outcome. It may be that those individuals exposed to decision making in groups may show these signs due to fear of ridicule and would therefore keep their true opinions to themselves. Or perhaps this 'mutual agreement' between the majorities has actually influenced the individual to change their opinion. Alternatively, can the minority influence the majority, and if so, how? Majority influence is the term used when talking about an individual conforming to a viewpoint of the majority, usually a group or organization that they follow. Studies done on the issue of majority influence are conducted to find how real the trend of 'conformity' is, and whether or not majority influence really does change the minds of individuals, or do individuals only agree overtly but keep their own views private. ...read more.


Others claimed that their reason for conformity was simply to avoid being seen as an 'outcast' even though they knew that the answer was wrong. From these findings we can see that both the groups despite having conformed and changed their judgements to those of the confederates still internally believed that their judgement was correct. As so the influence was not able to truly change their mind, however they did conform in public. Although it was found that when this same experiment was replicated only this time with 16 na�ve participants and 1 confederate, the answers given by the confederate were mocked and so the fear of being laughed at for giving the wrong answer had disappeared for the participants. It seems that the decision made by the individual when in a group depends on the environment and on the individuals themselves. By looking closely at the findings by Asch we see that there were participants who did conform at all throughout the entire experiment, whereas others conformed on every 'critical' trial, showing that decisions are also made depending on the individuals personality whether dependant or independent. It is found, however, that Asch's studys have been severly citisesed despite findings showing that individuals do conform to others judgements even when the answer may be wrong. ...read more.


The minority implies that the only solution to restore social stability and cognitive coherence is for the majority to shift towards the minority Moreover, Moscovici's studies appear to show that the shift in opinion brought about by minority influence is more enduring than that brought about by majority influence: "A minority .... can ... influence subjects to revise the very basis of their judgements, while a majority can make them almost all accept its point of view, if it is unanimous, without affecting the underlying perceptual-cognitive system. In other words, majority influence works on the surface while minority influence has deep-lying effects." [Studies in Social Influence III, Moscovici and Lage 1978 in European Journal of Social Psychology 8 quoted in Turner ( 1991)] In other words Moscovici is saying that a majority can certainly bring about compliance, i.e. people go along with what the majority want, but they don't necessarily believe in it. A minority on the other hand can bring about internalization, i.e. the individuals affected actually 'believe in' the minority's values. REFERENCE: Michael A.Hogg & Graham M.Vaugban (1995). Social psychology, An introduction. John W.McDavid & Herbert Harari (1968). Psychology & social behaviour. Studies in Social Influence III, Moscovici and Lage 1978 in European Journal of Social Psychology 8 quoted in Turner ( 1991) http://www.socialpychologyarena.com/journals.sample.as 1 Priya Khandpur ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Outline and Evaluate Psychological Research into Minority Social Influence

    From this it was concluded that in order for minority social influence to be effective the smaller group must be consistent, and the members of the minority group must be in concurrence with each other. Inconsistent minorities have very little influence over majorities, as the variation makes their opinions appear unfounded.

  2. The experiment conducted tested the theory of conformity under the influence of group pressure.

    Thus, the person can only really change the first two statements. He or she should come to like the group and/or the task more than he or she initially does. The theory is unable to predict for certain which of the two opinions will most likely change.

  1. Compare and contrast the effect of minority and majority influence on juror decision making ...

    The results in Asch study relates to jurors decision making by having a minority which conforms because of the fear being the odd one out and having the responsibility of putting the wrong person in jail - normative influence. However majority influence makes the juror's verdict unreliable.

  2. Focus Group Research gives the researcher access to tacit, uncodified and experiential knowledge in ...

    This kind of knowledge is often referred to as tacit knowledge.' I would also suggest that this definition includes experiential knowledge as the implication in Ursin's writing is that for knowledge to become 'embedded' it must be experienced and repeated, a form of learning from one's own mistakes and the actions of others.

  1. Theories of Asch and Tajfel

    This is the case even now, 6 months after his coming into FIMML. He did not adapt to the norm of the group. Perhaps this insinuates that Steve does not see IMML as one of the groups that form his social identity.

  2. To what extent are individual influenced by the majority and how can this be ...

    going along with is their in-group, individualists with a great deal of stress indeed. So the participants in Asch's experiment who yielded to the majority in judging line length were quite distressed but went along with the group nevertheless," Cited in Asch, 1952, chapter 11.

  1. investigating levels of majority influence

    were disgusting to not so disgusting. Once they finished rating the pictures we then chose 10 images that they chose to be disgusting. 20 male participants and 20 female participants from aged 16-18 were used in the investigation. The male and female participants were separated into two different rooms to measure the levels of conformity.

  2. difference between majority and minority influence

    The participants were required to state which of a variety of parallel lines were the longest. There was a degree of ambiguity as the lines were of similar length. In the control experiment, there were no confederates to distract the participant.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work