• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically evaluate research concerned with decision making in groups. Give attention to minority and majority group influences

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Critically evaluate research concerned with decision making in groups. Give attention to minority and majority group influences Lewin (1948) states the definition of a group was "a dynamic whole based on interdependence", and Newcomb (1957), "Shared norms and interlocking roles". Both definitions share two common features of norms and independence. This suggests that a group works around some form of 'normality' and 'mutuality' and therefore it is presumptuous that group decision-making would show apparent signs of 'mutual' agreement and 'normal' outcome. It may be that those individuals exposed to decision making in groups may show these signs due to fear of ridicule and would therefore keep their true opinions to themselves. Or perhaps this 'mutual agreement' between the majorities has actually influenced the individual to change their opinion. Alternatively, can the minority influence the majority, and if so, how? Majority influence is the term used when talking about an individual conforming to a viewpoint of the majority, usually a group or organization that they follow. Studies done on the issue of majority influence are conducted to find how real the trend of 'conformity' is, and whether or not majority influence really does change the minds of individuals, or do individuals only agree overtly but keep their own views private. ...read more.

Middle

Others claimed that their reason for conformity was simply to avoid being seen as an 'outcast' even though they knew that the answer was wrong. From these findings we can see that both the groups despite having conformed and changed their judgements to those of the confederates still internally believed that their judgement was correct. As so the influence was not able to truly change their mind, however they did conform in public. Although it was found that when this same experiment was replicated only this time with 16 na�ve participants and 1 confederate, the answers given by the confederate were mocked and so the fear of being laughed at for giving the wrong answer had disappeared for the participants. It seems that the decision made by the individual when in a group depends on the environment and on the individuals themselves. By looking closely at the findings by Asch we see that there were participants who did conform at all throughout the entire experiment, whereas others conformed on every 'critical' trial, showing that decisions are also made depending on the individuals personality whether dependant or independent. It is found, however, that Asch's studys have been severly citisesed despite findings showing that individuals do conform to others judgements even when the answer may be wrong. ...read more.

Conclusion

The minority implies that the only solution to restore social stability and cognitive coherence is for the majority to shift towards the minority Moreover, Moscovici's studies appear to show that the shift in opinion brought about by minority influence is more enduring than that brought about by majority influence: "A minority .... can ... influence subjects to revise the very basis of their judgements, while a majority can make them almost all accept its point of view, if it is unanimous, without affecting the underlying perceptual-cognitive system. In other words, majority influence works on the surface while minority influence has deep-lying effects." [Studies in Social Influence III, Moscovici and Lage 1978 in European Journal of Social Psychology 8 quoted in Turner ( 1991)] In other words Moscovici is saying that a majority can certainly bring about compliance, i.e. people go along with what the majority want, but they don't necessarily believe in it. A minority on the other hand can bring about internalization, i.e. the individuals affected actually 'believe in' the minority's values. REFERENCE: Michael A.Hogg & Graham M.Vaugban (1995). Social psychology, An introduction. John W.McDavid & Herbert Harari (1968). Psychology & social behaviour. Studies in Social Influence III, Moscovici and Lage 1978 in European Journal of Social Psychology 8 quoted in Turner ( 1991) http://www.socialpychologyarena.com/journals.sample.as 1 Priya Khandpur ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Outline and Evaluate Psychological Research into Minority Social Influence

    of the participant, but however is due to the social influence of others. This is important as it shows a more realistic application to everyday life and human behaviour than when an ambiguous task is used- most situations in real life will be unambiguous, so by using an unambiguous stimulus we are provided with a more accurate representation.

  2. Compare and contrast the effect of minority and majority influence on juror decision making ...

    The results in Asch study relates to jurors decision making by having a minority which conforms because of the fear being the odd one out and having the responsibility of putting the wrong person in jail - normative influence. However majority influence makes the juror's verdict unreliable.

  1. investigating levels of majority influence

    Before starting the experiment all the participants were told they had a right to withdraw at any time. A copy of this script can be seen in appendix B. The participants were then shown images through a slide-show, with one experimenter controlling the slide-show and asking the participants for their opinions.

  2. difference between majority and minority influence

    The participants were required to state which of a variety of parallel lines were the longest. There was a degree of ambiguity as the lines were of similar length. In the control experiment, there were no confederates to distract the participant.

  1. Theories of Asch and Tajfel

    "As long as individuals see themselves as more important than the group, then the latter cannot function effectively".6 Steve joining the French group lowered our self-awareness and heightened our group awareness. The group has had no influence over his behaviour and showed animosity to him by for example sighing or laughing when he talks.

  2. To what extent are individual influenced by the majority and how can this be ...

    going along with is their in-group, individualists with a great deal of stress indeed. So the participants in Asch's experiment who yielded to the majority in judging line length were quite distressed but went along with the group nevertheless," Cited in Asch, 1952, chapter 11.

  1. The experiment conducted tested the theory of conformity under the influence of group pressure.

    People may conform because the group succeeds in persuading or pressuring them to do so. Some researchers have proposed that people also conform as a result of a psychological need to evaluate themselves. The theory is that people want to know whether their beliefs and opinions are what they should be.

  2. Focus Group Research gives the researcher access to tacit, uncodified and experiential knowledge in ...

    What is tacit, uncodified and experiential knowledge? Tacit and uncodified knowledge are often embedded within action and as such are often unrecognised or unrecognisable; they are also subjective and thus have often been discounted as a 'viable' or 'reliable' source of knowledge from positivist interpretations.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work