• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe and evaluate at least two theories of forgetting.

Extracts from this document...


Sarah Andrews. Describe and evaluate at least two theories of forgetting . [18 marks] In this essay I have chosen to look at Freud's motivated theory of forgetting and cue - dependent forgetting. I have chosen these because they both report convincing arguments to try to explain why we forget. Freud's motivated theory of forgetting states that the ego represses unpleasant memories into our subconscious in order to avoid anxiety in the event of recall. Freud says that techniques such as dream analysis are the only way to access the repressed memories. Herman and Schaton[1987] carried out a study which supports Freud's theory. They found that when questioned, 28% of females affected by incest showed a memory deficit as a child. This is a sign of repression during childhood, to block out any unpleasant memories. ...read more.


A further study by Godden and Baddley [1975] tested deep sea divers on their recall both on land and underwater. They observed that the divers recall was best in the environment the information was learnt. For example words learnt underwater were recalled best underwater. This study supports both cue - dependant and context dependent theory. Freud's theory of motivated forgetting intuitively seems to be reasonable. Repressed memories [if in existance] could have an effect on our behaviour. However, one main weakness of his theory is the inexplanation of why we forget pleasant memories. The study by Herman and Schaton [1987] showed a 28% result. This is by no means definitve. It could have been the case that some subjects in their experiment did not talk about their negative memories because of embarrassment or to protect their privacy. ...read more.


If the memory is not accessible, how can it be proven that the memory has been encoded. However, the supporting studies do have definitive results. They clearly show subjects' recall is far more enhanced by the use of close cues [ the encoding specify principle]. This theory can be used effectively by anyone wishing to remember information. Effective use of cue cards enhances memorability and encourages semantic encoding. Freud's theory of motivated forgetting and cue - dependent theory of forgetting are both intuitively believable concepts. However cue - dependent theory does seem to have more evidence to support it. It is also a lot more scientific than Freud's theory and has more definitive results. In conclusion both cue - dependent theory of forgetting and Freud's theory have many strong points about why we forget. However cue - dependent theory of forgetting seems to have the stronger evidence and scientific evidence to back up it's theory. 588 words - 1hr 15 mins. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Psychology Retrospective Interference coursework

    10 7 8 Median 9 6.5 7.5 Standard deviation 1.1 1.9 1.1 (Calculations- View appendix) Graph: Subsequently, an appropriate graph was constructed to show and compare the average mean of the number adjectives recalled in each condition. In this experiment, a bar graph was chosen.

  2. This study is based on the theory of cue dependent forgetting - more specifically, ...

    Rationale Like Godden and Baddeley, this investigation uses location as a context for recall. The basis for this investigation is Godden and Baddeley's study of divers, which is replicated with the use of a classroom as the environment for learning. Like Godden and Baddeley, an experimental method has been used.

  1. Cue dependent Forgetting. This experiment investigates Tulvings theory of cue dependent forgetting, with ...

    These are also called external cues, example such as a particular classroom. (Cox 2001) In Abernathy's research, he concluded that participants were able to recall more words with better accuracy in the same environment of where they learned the words.

  2. Memory and forgetting

    The findings clearly showed that the mere passage of time was not the factor, which determined how well team names, could be recalled. Forgetting appeared to be due to interference rather than trace decay. If interference is the main cause of forgetting then people should remember material over a long time period, provided no interference occurs.

  1. Psychology Report

    Items from the beginning of the list were recalled quite well relative to those in the middle ( the primary effect), but not as well as those at the end.

  2. Evaluate two theories of forgetting.

    At which point information is completely forgotten. The idea of trace decay extends through to LTM, in the form of decay through disuse. This is if certain knowledge or skills are not used or practised for long periods of time, the memory trace linked to them will fade and hence they will be forgotten.

  1. To What Extent Is motivated Forgetting Produced By Failure Feedback?

    Also we're checking to see if we can replicate similar results to D'Zurilla. It's not an exact replication of D'Zurilla's study but we're checking if failure feedback could affect memory. Aims Our aims are to find out if motivated forgetting occurs when failure feedback is used during a memory test.

  2. Cue-dependent forgetting theory by Tulving

    proactive interference long-term memory by looking at retention rates of material over 24 hours. Proactive interference is where material you leaned first, interferes with material that you learn later. Participants were shown lists of nonsense words over a set time.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work