• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe and evaluate models of memory.

Extracts from this document...


Claire Harvey DISCRIBE AND EVALUATE MODELS OF MEMORY What is memory? Memory is involved in all aspects of our lives, is it a cognitive thinking process or a way of retaining information or is it a number of connected stores or even actual information retained. According to Reber (1985), it is possibly all of theses. Memory has not been defined as a single process or fact and several theories exist about its nature, character and structure. We have vast amounts of information stored in our memory systems which we are able to access quickly and effortlessly, this implies that knowledge stored must be highly organised to allow us to retrieve the appropriate information for a given situation. This organising will be determined by the way that information is encoded into memory. The way the knowledge is organised will determine the type of process required to access that information in the future. Atkinson and Shiffrin (1969) suggested that memory comprised of three separate stores. The sensory memory store, the short-term memory and the long term-memory each store has a specific and relatively inflexible function. This was called the multi-store model. There are two main memory stores short term memory (STM) ...read more.


Long-term memory is studied in the same way as short-term memory.Encoding, capacity and duration. Two types of encoding are thought to operate in long-term, declarative memory and procedural memory. Declarative memories evolves semantic memory, this is memory for meaning, and episodic memory, this concerns knowing when, where and what. It is linked to personal experiences. Procedural memory, is memories of how to do things, this is often automatic and is resistant to forgetting. Baddeley(1966)researched semantic encoding by presenting participants with four list to remember, list 1 contained similar sounding words and list 2 had now words of the same sounds, list 4 contained words with similar meaning and list 3 had no relevance to each other. They were then asked to recall as many words as possible immediately after and then again after 20 minutes.Baddeley found that immediate recall was better for list 2 than for list 1 and there was little difference between list 3 and 4. After 20 minutes he found they recalled list 4 better than list 3 and there was no difference between list 1 and list 2.This experiment showed that long-term memory tends to store information accounting to semantics rather then simply sound.Baddeley also used a laboratory experiment and can therefore be criticised in terms of ecological validity, although it has good reliability. ...read more.


It showed that encoding was not at all simple. This helped to widen the focus on seeing the ltm as just a simple storage unit to seeing it as a complex processing system. Craik and Lockhart's ideas led to lots of experiments, most of which confirmed the ideas of the deep semantic processing systems and led to lots of supporting evidence. Research today agrees that STM is made up of a number of subsystems; the working memory model explains a lot more than the multi-store. In conclusion all the research that has been carried out does not prove precisely how memory works.Reber (1985) according to the experiments shown is right. Memory is all three of these, a cognitive thinking process, a way of retaining information and actual information retained. Psychologists have put a lot of time into figuring out the mysteries of memory. It is a very complex subject and I am sure they will be researching it for years to come. Each individual person uses memory in a different way. Think of memory as a computer, the short-term memory is the ram and the long-term memory as the hard drive. As I have already said the brains ability is more powerful than the world's largest computer, more than anyone can imagine, I don't think we will ever really know all of its capabilities. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays


    Each participant has 1 pen and a scoring sheet (See appendix 5). This was handed out at the beginning of the investigation. As group 2 were tested after group1, they would reuse the pens. Bowls was also required because names of people in each sex were drawn out of each bowl.

  2. effects of chunking and unchunking on short term memory

    An additional drawback was the attitude towards the researchers, some of the participants knew the researchers and therefore answers would not be true, but skewed to please the researcher. This can be avoided by asking a person of authority, such as a teacher, reading the instructions and explaining the importance of concentration and silence.

  1. Investigating the short-term memory

    PREDICTIVE HYPOTHESIS When a distraction is added, less word will be recalled. This is due to the information not being directly rehearsed and therefore slightly forgotten. NULL HYPOTHESIS There will be no difference in the amount of words recalled between groups 1 and 2.

  2. Categorisation in Long-Term Memory

    The participants were aware they were taking part in a psychology experiment so the results could have been affected by demand characteristics. Suggestions for improving validity Participants were aware they were talking part in a psychology experiment which could have created demand characteristics and possible experimenter bias.

  1. 'Organisation in Memory'.

    Noise was a problem in my experiment as too much noise could have affected recall. I attempted to overcome this by conducting my experiment in a classroom where very little background noise was occurring. This is because in general people who entered the classroom were very considerate and understood that experiments were occurring so were quiet.

  2. "An experiment to see the effect of chunking on short-term memory recall".

    When I had obtained all of the participants I took them into an empty classroom and randomly split the participants into two groups of 10. I then placed them at opposite ends of the room and gave them a piece of paper and a pen.

  1. Does chunking help with memory?

    These figures show what an obvious effect organization imposes on memory. It seems to apparently increase memory capacity. Short-term memory has a limited capacity of approximately 7? 2 slots of information. This is supported by the fact that an average of 6 words were recalled from the disorganized list.

  2. Explain and evaluate the three models of memory.

    Once information is passed onto the STM, it is then passed to the LTM whereby it is stored with regard to its encoding, whether this is acoustic/visual/semantic. This presents us with one key idea, the more attention the individual pays to something, the more semantic meaning or relevance it will

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work