• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe and evaluate models of memory.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Claire Harvey DISCRIBE AND EVALUATE MODELS OF MEMORY What is memory? Memory is involved in all aspects of our lives, is it a cognitive thinking process or a way of retaining information or is it a number of connected stores or even actual information retained. According to Reber (1985), it is possibly all of theses. Memory has not been defined as a single process or fact and several theories exist about its nature, character and structure. We have vast amounts of information stored in our memory systems which we are able to access quickly and effortlessly, this implies that knowledge stored must be highly organised to allow us to retrieve the appropriate information for a given situation. This organising will be determined by the way that information is encoded into memory. The way the knowledge is organised will determine the type of process required to access that information in the future. Atkinson and Shiffrin (1969) suggested that memory comprised of three separate stores. The sensory memory store, the short-term memory and the long term-memory each store has a specific and relatively inflexible function. This was called the multi-store model. There are two main memory stores short term memory (STM) ...read more.

Middle

Long-term memory is studied in the same way as short-term memory.Encoding, capacity and duration. Two types of encoding are thought to operate in long-term, declarative memory and procedural memory. Declarative memories evolves semantic memory, this is memory for meaning, and episodic memory, this concerns knowing when, where and what. It is linked to personal experiences. Procedural memory, is memories of how to do things, this is often automatic and is resistant to forgetting. Baddeley(1966)researched semantic encoding by presenting participants with four list to remember, list 1 contained similar sounding words and list 2 had now words of the same sounds, list 4 contained words with similar meaning and list 3 had no relevance to each other. They were then asked to recall as many words as possible immediately after and then again after 20 minutes.Baddeley found that immediate recall was better for list 2 than for list 1 and there was little difference between list 3 and 4. After 20 minutes he found they recalled list 4 better than list 3 and there was no difference between list 1 and list 2.This experiment showed that long-term memory tends to store information accounting to semantics rather then simply sound.Baddeley also used a laboratory experiment and can therefore be criticised in terms of ecological validity, although it has good reliability. ...read more.

Conclusion

It showed that encoding was not at all simple. This helped to widen the focus on seeing the ltm as just a simple storage unit to seeing it as a complex processing system. Craik and Lockhart's ideas led to lots of experiments, most of which confirmed the ideas of the deep semantic processing systems and led to lots of supporting evidence. Research today agrees that STM is made up of a number of subsystems; the working memory model explains a lot more than the multi-store. In conclusion all the research that has been carried out does not prove precisely how memory works.Reber (1985) according to the experiments shown is right. Memory is all three of these, a cognitive thinking process, a way of retaining information and actual information retained. Psychologists have put a lot of time into figuring out the mysteries of memory. It is a very complex subject and I am sure they will be researching it for years to come. Each individual person uses memory in a different way. Think of memory as a computer, the short-term memory is the ram and the long-term memory as the hard drive. As I have already said the brains ability is more powerful than the world's largest computer, more than anyone can imagine, I don't think we will ever really know all of its capabilities. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Describe and Evaluate 2 Models Of Memory

    4 star(s)

    STM is very limited; researched by Miller in 1956 it is supposed to be 7 items plus or minus 2. For example, you are processing the words you read on the screen in your STM. However, if I ask, "What is your telephone number?"

  2. SHORT TERM MEMORY

    Each participant has 1 pen and a scoring sheet (See appendix 5). This was handed out at the beginning of the investigation. As group 2 were tested after group1, they would reuse the pens. Bowls was also required because names of people in each sex were drawn out of each bowl.

  1. Categorisation in Long-Term Memory

    Therefore using the same words will reduce this effect. In the list of organised words it was obvious that the experiment was testing memory which led to demand characteristics. The experiment were standardised which meant it's easy to replicate. However, because participants were already told that they were taking part in a psychology experiment on memory, they knew what

  2. Cue dependent Forgetting. This experiment investigates Tulvings theory of cue dependent forgetting, with ...

    The conditions in the two contexts include some uncontrollable variables such as temperature, lighting, and noise levels that reduce the replicability of this experiment. To solve this problem, researcher should carry out this experiment in a laboratory where most confounding variables become controllable and thus increase the replicability of experiment.

  1. Investigating the short-term memory

    which included the idea that in order to recall information in the short term memory the information has to be first given attention in order to be passed on to short term. The recall result therefore depends on the amount of time rehearsed.

  2. "An experiment to see the effect of chunking on short-term memory recall".

    because of their appearance or maybe their personality, however because of this it means that the way in which the sample is obtained contains bias. Apparatus The apparatus that was used to complete this experiment consisted of a stop clock to measure the time allowed to complete each stage of

  1. effects of chunking and unchunking on short term memory

    All mobile phones were asked to be switched off at out of hands reach to minimise distraction. Communication between participants was prevented by explaining the importance of independent results at the beginning of the experiment. To avoid any ethical issues all participants were debriefed at the end of the experiment

  2. The effect of chunking on memory recall in STM.

    The hypothesis is in a test of short term memory recall involving 10 participants who had to remember and recall 5 chunked mobile phone numbers and 5 un-chunked mobile phone numbers. Participants who used the chunking method will score higher than participants who didn't use the chunking method.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work