• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe and evaluate the Multistore Model of Memory.

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Describe and evaluate the Multi-Store Model (MMS) of memory. The MMS, described by Atkinson and Shiffrin, states that memory is made up of the sensory store, the short term memory and the long term memory. The sensory store is made up of the eyes, ears, fingers, nose, tongue etc and the corresponding areas of the brain. The sensory stores are constantly receiving information but most of this receives no attention and remains in there for a very brief period. If attention is paid it is transferred to the STM, where it is held in a fragile state and will disappear unless rehearsed. The STM has a very limited capacity (approximately 4 chunks). ...read more.


also shows evidence for separate stores. People with Korsakoff ?s syndrome provide support for the model as they can recall the last items in a list (unimpaired recency effect), suggesting an unaffected STM. However, their LTM is very poor. The model has been criticised for being too simplistic as it assumes there is only one long term and one short term store, which has been disproved by evidence from brain damage patients, suggesting several different short term and long term stores. It does not explain some observations, for example the fact that memory does not just pass in one direction ? LTM also affects the chunking of information in the STM; Miller & ...read more.


Simple rehearsal of information may not be the predominant process for acquiring information and other factors may affect memory formation, e.g. emotional (flashbulb memory), motivational levels, learnt methods for memorisation. Conversely, information is not always rehearsed in real life yet they still transfer it into the LTM, and some memories like smells can?t be rehearsed so rehearsal is not always needed for information to be stored. Other models suggest more complex memory functions which cannot be explained by the MSM such as the Working Memory Model (Baddeley & Hitch) and the Levels of Processing Model (Craik & Lockhart). The MSM may not reveal the full extent of memory function, or the complexity of memory. Finally, many studies supporting the MSM used laboratory experiments and therefore have low ecological validity and demand characteristics. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Describe and evaluate the Multi-store Model of memory.

    3 star(s)

    It also places emphasis on the amount of information that can be processed rather than its nature. Some things are simply easier to remember others, perhaps because they are more interesting, more distinctive, funnier etc. The multi-store cannot account for this.


    The standard deviation shows how far away or how close the results are to the mean thus showing the reliability of each set of results. The closer the standard deviation is to zero, the better and more reliable the result is.

  1. Primacy and Recency effect

    having a mean recall of 9.4 which was better than the mean recall rate found for the middle words (11-20) having a mean recall rate of 5.4. As seen from the results it seems like the theory of Primacy and Recency effect does occur.

  2. Does chunking help with memory?

    paper * Pen * Stopwatch Ethics * Participants must be over 16 years of age. * Participants should give informed consent to take part. * Confidentiality is of the utmost importance - no names will be recorded * Subjects are free to withdrawn from the study at any point, even

  1. Outline and Evaluate the Multi Store Model of Memory and One Alternative Model

    One example of an investigation to substantiate this idea is Hunt and Elliott's (1980) experiment, where it was found that participants could recall more words that had distinctive patterns of tall and short letters than words that appeared to have no distinctive patterns.

  2. Explain and evaluate the three models of memory.

    They suggested that maintenance rehearsal might be enough to keep information in the STM while elaborative rehearsal was used to transfer information to the LTM. The next model was proposed by Baddeley and Hitch (1974), they began by criticising the multi-store model by believing that it played a much more

  1. Describe and evaluate models of memory.

    Schulman's research suggests that Conrad was incorrect in saying all encoding were acoustic. Schulman, presented participants with visual list of ten words. They were then asked to recall them. Recall was tested using cue or probe words. The first probe word were homonyms, words which sound the same but have different meaning, like ball and bawl.

  2. Investigating the serial position effect in memory

    Rationale The issue to be investigated in this study is the serial position effect in memory. Glanzer and Cunitz's study demonstrated the effects of delaying recall on the recency effect. Repeating the experiment with a completely new set of words (using words that are of one syllable)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work