• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe and evaluate the research methods used by the behaviourist approach

Extracts from this document...


Question: Describe and evaluate the research methods used by behaviourism Behaviourism is a belief that the environment causes and affects our behaviour. The approach accepts determinism and believes that all behaviour can be explained in terms of, behaviour is a direct result of environmental stimuli that can be predicted. Empiricism is accepted and behaviourism rejects 'abstract' terms such as 'id', 'ego' etc. Lab based experiments have taken place in the field of behaviourism to come up with empirical evidence to support theories, experiments such as, Pavlov's dogs, The skinner box, Bobo the doll and Little Albert are among them. This is an advantage as it means results are reliable, meaning that they can be repeated and still achieves consistent results making the research valid. Behaviourism did experiments on both humans and animals. In using humans, the experiment is at risk of obtaining false results because as humans we have a conscious thought and can tell the experiment is not real. The 'Hawthorne Effect' suggests that we, as humans, perform better when being watched. ...read more.


Watson and Rayner struck an iron bar with a hammer behind the child's head whenever he touched the rat and not surprisingly, Little Albert began to cry and show fear as he has heard this noise. (Watson said this was an innate response to loud noises) Watson and Rayner repeated this several times for nearly 2 months and what Watson found was that Little Albert became distressed whenever the rat was just in the room and no loud noise was needed to generate this response. What had happened, was Little Albert had associated the white rat (conditioned stimulus) with the loud noise (unconditioned stimulus) and shown a fear response, the original innate unconditioned response to the loud noise had now become a conditioned response to the white rat. Stimulus generalisation became apparent after the experiment as Little Albert also showed fear responses to non-white rabbits, cotton wool, a Santa Claus mask etc. An advantage of this experiment was that it has given us more understanding in modern-day psychology and we now have 'aversion therapy' based on these classical conditioning principles to help stop a number of maladaptive behaviours such as smoking, alcohol abuse, nail biting, stealing and many more. ...read more.


The third group (the control group) were exposed to a passive adult that showed no aggression and was neither rewarded nor punished after. The next stage of the experiment was to take each group of children into a room with an identical set up to that in the video and monitor how each behaved. The first group, nearly all the children copied the aggression. The second, were also aggressive, even though they saw the adult punished, however, there was slightly less aggression than the first group. The third group showed no aggression towards the toys. An advantage is that it shows aggression can be learned through imitation regardless of the consequence, for example, the children who saw the adults receive punishment were still aggressive. A disadvantage is that the experiment was conducted on toys and not real people. It is said to be lacking in ecological validity. One can not really conclude that violent films etc, can have an effect on a child's aggression towards others. Some psychologists argue that Bobo the doll is designed to spring back up when knocked over and is therefore, designed as a 'target.' Naomi Harding - Psychology ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)


The writer has discussed some experiments that have been carried out by behaviourists and has explained them very well. It may have been better however, to cover more experiments but in less detail in order to show an understanding of behaviourists' research methodology. Also, in order to increase the rating, the writer needs to think more carefully about the introduction and conclusion.

Score 3*

Marked by teacher Linda Penn 26/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Critically evaluate whether Milgrams research on obedience was ethical

    4 star(s)

    The BPS guidelines however state that the participant should be reminded of their right to withdraw if it is a lengthy experiment, particularly if they seem distressed; therefore, this would also be an unethical point in modern times. As informed consent was not obtained for the experiment, it follows that deception was also present in Milgram's research methods.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Outline and evaluate biological explanations of aggression

    4 star(s)

    Harrison's study only used male participants and then generalised the results to the whole population - these is beta bias, as it is assuming that there are no real differences between men and women. Also men have higher levels of testosterone than women - so how does it affect women?

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The effect of the Level of Processing on the amount of information recalled

    4 star(s)

    However, this type of sampling is unrepresentative of the population at large, and biased. There were thirty-eight participants in the sample. It was not known whether English was the first language of all participants.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Discuss the use of animals in psychological research.

    3 star(s)

    Another ethical reason against the use of animals is the animal rights argument. In contrast to the Utilitarian argument, the animal rights argument says that research using animals should never be tolerated under any circumstances. The animal rights argument argues that animals have an inherent value and should not be treated as merely renewable resources.

  1. Peer reviewed

    Outline the strengths and weaknesses of the social approach .

    5 star(s)

    The first weakness of the social approach is research has ethical issues, particularly protection from harm. Protection from harm means that any individual who is a participant from research should be protected from any harm both physical and mental they would not be subject to in their everyday life.

  2. "Anti-Social Behaviour is caused by a person's family background"

    There was also a clear difference generally with the amount of crimes committed amongst males compared to females, with anti social behaviour being more common amongst males. A further difference was noticed amongst males from single parent families who were working class living with their mother compared with other participants,

  1. Psychological Theories Of Crime

    Another personality theory was proposed by Eysenck (1977). Eysenck attempted to give some insight to why some people are more likely to disobey rules based on their personality. Eysenck's theory looks at the subtle differences in the central and autonomic nervous systems of individuals. He argued that personality is determined by inherited biological constitution.

  2. Describe and evaluate the interview as a research method in psychology

    Some quantitative data may also be collected during the interview , such as age, length of time at a job or other personal information and this quantitative data can be shown in numbers or percentages. If the interview is very structured, then it is more likely that quantitative data will

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work