• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe and evaluate two or more theories of the formation of romantic relationships. (24 marks)

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Describe and evaluate two or more theories of the formation of romantic relationships. (24 marks) Jan?11 By looking at the process by which people enter into a romantic relationship, psychologists have come up with various theories and hypotheses to explain the formation of a romantic relationship. There are 2 theories that help explain why people choose one person over another, or why some fail before even starting. One of these theories is the ?Filter Model? (FM) which was proposed by Kerchoff and Davis in 1962. This theory argues that relationships develop through 3 filters so different factors are important at different times. There are many potential partners but slowly we narrow it to potential partners that we could realistically form a romantic relationship will; so basically we come up with a small field of desirables. The first filter looks at demographic or social variables. So we discard those people who we will never come into contact during our lives. Therefore this leaves us with the people who we tend to mix with: go to school/ work, live in the same area or do the same activities or sports. As we can?t meet everyone in the world, millions are automatically filtered out as it would be impossible to establish a relationship with them. ...read more.


There is another element of bias as questionnaires were used. As it was an opportunity sample the students may have responded in a way that they thought would benefit the researcher and in a way that was regarded by social norms. Therefore all these factors show that there was social desirability bias, demand characteristics and population validity. The second theory is the reward/need satisfaction (RNS) theory, which states that we form friendships and relationships to receive rewards or reinforcement from others. In order for a relationship to progress, both partners must be motivated to continue getting to know each other. The theory also stated that a relationship is more likely to be formed if a person meets the needs of the partner and they provide rewards. Relationships provide rewards such as sex, love, money etc which satisfy our social needs, e.g. self-esteem, dependency etc. So in terms of operant conditioning, the relationship is being positively reinforced because it?s rewarding. Both needs and rewards need to be fulfilled for a relationship to work. This theory agrees with the FM as both stresses the importance of satisfying each other?s needs. However, they have different views on when they should be met. For example, the FM states it should be during filter 3, once they have already met those who are similar to them in terms of attitudes and values, and where they have filtered out those who are very different. ...read more.


This may represent a narrow view of factors important in forming a relationship, with other factors for example economic level or physical condition. However, both the FM and RNS have ignored individual differences. In the FM there are some couples who have nothing in common but their relationship is as strong as others who have everything in common. Sometimes it?s better to have fewer things in common than everything because couples can get bored of each other when everything they do is the same. In the RNS model there are some individuals who don?t like being rewarded but like satisfying their partner?s needs, so there is no need to have a balance in needs and rewards as they will be happy in their relationship. This leads us to the last point of cultural bias. Both these theories are culturally specific as it has been researched in a particular culture and country. The psychologists haven?t taken into account cultural relativism as they have only studied one culture and disregarded the idea that all cultures are different but they are equally worth studying. There is an element of ethnocentrism as the findings from the research has been generalised to all other cultures. In the RNS model this is greatly criticised as many cultures focus on the needs rather than receiving rewards, so in these relationships there won?t be a balance. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Describe and evaluate research into the formation and maintenance of relationships

    3 star(s)

    There are problems with this model. Many social relationships which are more commonly found in nonwestern, collectivist cultures shall little concern for the receipt of reinforcements. For example, Hill told that kinship bonds are very influential, resilient and not dependant upon reinforcement. There is evidence of gender as well as cultural differences with this morning.

  2. Outline and Evaluate two or more theories of the formation of relationships

    A good example is Hill found kinship bonds are a lot more important then any satisfaction of ones individual needs. So this theory mainly only applies for western cultures where 'goods' and physical possessions are important. A second model could be the social exchange theory.

  1. Relationship formation

    This and many experiments (e.g. Cunningham, 1998) have shown that positive effect (feeling/emotion) can lead to attraction. However this experiment didn't take into account individual differences as participants may like the unpleasant music just as much as the pleasant music.

  2. Describe and evaluate the theories of attraction and relationship formation.

    as many women as possible, as this increases the chances of his genes being handed down as copiously as possible into the next generation. The reasons for this lie in the vast number of sperm that the man is capable of producing.

  1. Describe and Evaluate two theories of the formation of romantic relationships

    In 1962 Kerckoff and Davis presented another form of relationship formation theory known as the filter model. They believed that we have three filters that are important at different times before we can enter a relationship. We start with a field of availables, those who are free for relationships and

  2. Outline and evaluate one theory of the formation of romantic relationships. (4+8 marks)

    This supports the theory because it argues that different factors are important at different times in the relationship. In the initial stages, in order for the relationship to progress the couple must share things in common in order to be able to communicate with each other.

  1. Outline and evaluate 2 theories of relationship formation

    Further evidence supporting the match hypothesis was conducted at a later date (1971) by Silverman. The procedure involved observing unmarried couples (18-22 years of age) in a naturalistic dating setting (e.g. bars, social events, restaurant) and getting two male and female observers rated the opposite sex on a 5 point scale.

  2. Discuss research into the breakdown of romantic relationships (24 marks)

    Due to this, the theory could potentially generate new hypotheses and therefore expand the range of knowledge on this topic. Psychologists could begin to find out which costs or rewards are more involved in the maintenance of relationships. The SET is a humanistic theory as it has intuitive credibility as

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work