• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe How Psychologists define and Explain substance abuse?

Extracts from this document...


Describe How Psychologists define and Explain substance abuse? In order for psychologists to endeavour to define substance abuse, 'Substance' itself must be defined an in the context of psychology a substance is defined as anything an individual may ingest that alters mood, cognition or behaviour. Therefore there is clearly a long list of substances including chocolate (known for changes in level of neurochemical Serotonin) or Coffee (Stimulant). Hence the term substance is more commonly referred to nicotine, alcohol, stimulants (i.e. cocaine and Ecstacy) and depressants such as Heroin and Ecstacy. There is distinction between Substance use and abuse. An individual who can enjoy an alcoholic drink, for example, but in a context where there is no dependency on the substance, such a scenario is regarded with social acceptance. Complexities lie in stating at what point an individual changes from using to abusing a substance. Substance abuse is therefore most commonly associated with addiction. Sarafino states an addiction to a substance usually consists of two elements: - Physical and psychological. Physical dependency refers to the body having adjusted to the substance and including it for 'regular' functioning of body tissue. This then induces two effects, the first being tolerance where the body adapts and requires larger dose of substance to achieve similar effect. ...read more.


The work By Lucas and Lloyd on 11-14 year olds is not generalisable as the sample population were between 11 and 14 years of age and so frame of mind will be very different. This assumption of peer pressure rests largely on self reports of smokers who may be reluctant to concede that their use was motivated by other perhaps abnormal sources and so produce more socially acceptable ones, e.g. Peer pressure. This induction of possible demand characteristics ultimately makes the research unreliable. However upon considering a Means - End analysis, this piece of research has proven to be a useful insight as to why children take up smoking and allows psychologists to develop a more specific way of combating the issue. Ethologists argue with the social learning theory, as it appears that it ignores innate built in biases in learning due to evolution making it more deterministic in defining and explaining substance abuse. The physiological approach in explaining substance abuse is reductionism, explaining substance abuse through solely the actions of neurones or genetics, this may result in ignoring other suitable levels of explanation and the interaction of causal factors. The bio psychosocial theories often over simplify the huge complexity of physical systems and their interaction with environmental factors. ...read more.


This may produce a fear within the audience and so make them less likely to take up smoking for fear of suffering the unfortunate consequences as discussed by our presenter. The most effective medium I feel is one to one communication as the reality of the situation produces far more impact on the individual and a more personal relationship can be assumed by the physical closeness achieved. The message should be absent of technicalities but simple, short clear and precise for according to the Yale Model the audience are far more likely to remember if information conveyed is short but with impact. Also again according to the Yale model the effects of persuasive communication tend to wear off over time, however the negative effects of smoking are apparently better remembered when audience participate therefore concluding with a group discussion may provide to be a very useful exercise. However we must take into account this issue of Social control, and hence although we are trying to prevent the islanders from taking up smoking, one should explain why people take up the habit and the positive reinforcement they achieve from doing so, but simultaneously be able to enhance the negativities associated with the activity. The people should be able to make the decision for themselves without social manipulation from the source from which they are learning. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Social Cognition

    3 star(s)

    A Category is a group of people who are perceived to have things in common e.g.

  2. Psychology Questions Ansewered

    This remained so regardless of whether it was the standard, the one judgement or the fixed array condition. The conditions the children were placed under impacted upon the outcome of the study. The children in the one judgement condition made less errors than children in either of the other two conditions.

  1. Conformity - psychologists view

    In-group members who conform strongly are core group members who are asserting the identity of the group, or peripheral members who are trying to impress the core members, perhaps to be accepted into the inner circle (which is in fact another group-within-the-group).

  2. social interaction

    This is more likely to be relevant to Ms Brown's case as at the first arrival to the new neighbourhood Ms Brown knew no one. The bobo doll experiment was well controlled. The experiment did include other toys for the children to play with, yet they chose to copy specific aggression towards the doll.

  1. Describe what psychologists know about leadership.

    According to Fiedler (1967), low-LPC task-oriented leaders are successful in either very favourable or very unfavourable situations because their take-charge style and focus on task success encourages the group to perform the job; whilst, in favourable circumstances with straightforward and structured tasks, and good relations between leader and worker, the

  2. What are attribution biases and when do they occur?

    expertise, which contestants were, unlikely to share, observers (as well as contestants themselves) nevertheless consistently rated quizmasters as genuinely higher in general knowledge than contestants. Again, people seemed reluctant to discount personal factors even when there were strong situational constraints on the other person's behaviour, and inappropriately assumed that internal characteristics were the main cause of performance.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work