• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe what psychologists have learned about environmental disaster and/or technological catastrophe.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Essay on environmental disaster and catastrophe a) Describe what psychologists have learned about environmental disaster and/or technological catastrophe An environmental disaster is a natural disaster that few people will experience in their lifetime. These are relatively infrequent natural events that are the product of natural physical forces governing the earth and atmosphere. A technological catastrophe is a human made disaster, the result of some human error or miscalculation. These events are usually called disasters when there is a substantial degree of destruction and disruption and the events are uncontrollable either because they are natural disasters or because they represent the occasional loss of control over something which humans normally control very well. Psychologists have studied disasters and catastrophes in an attempt to ascertain what characterises a disaster and what the psychological effects of disaster and catastrophe. It has been found that the characteristics of a disaster effect how people react. One important characteristic is the amount of warning available. Fritz & Marks (1954) found that a lack of warning about a disaster can make the consequences worse, however Drabek & Stephenson (1971) found that the effectiveness of repeated warnings of flash floods was undermined by factors such as families being separated at the time of warnings - they showed more concern for locating each other than evacuating, and the method used to deliver warnings - the news media reached the most people but was least effective in producing appropriate responses. Psychologists have also studied people's awareness and perception of the risks they face from natural disaster. ...read more.

Middle

used interviews, questionnaires and observations to try to measure social cohesiveness in two communities where technological catastrophes had occurred. These measurements may lack validity, which is being sure that a measurement actually does measure the variable it claims to measure, and reliability, which means the measurement being reliable over time, since the methods used may suffer from problems of social desirability responses and observer bias. In COMPARISON the measurements used by Simms & Baumann were personality based questionnaires and interviews, and these may also lack validity and reliability, as these researchers used these measurements as an indication of perceived risk from natural disaster. In CONTRAST Davidson & Baum (1986) used a range of both physiological and self-report measures of stress, and these measurements were high in validity and reliability. The third evaluation issue is ethnocentrism, which means applying the norms found in one culture to the whole of the world. A great deal of research in disasters and catastrophes has been carried out in America and Europe, western cultures. For example Simms & Baumann's research was carried out in Illinois and Alabama, but these researchers used their results to make generalisations about personality and perception of risk from disaster. In COMPARISON Bowman's research with psychiatric patients was carried out in Alaska, however Bowman also made generalisations about social cohesiveness in responses to disasters. It could be argued that in some cultures collectivism is already much greater than in western cultures that tend to be more individualistic, and therefore this research may be of little use in predicting responses to disaster globally. ...read more.

Conclusion

but may decrease after technological disasters (Cuthbertson & Nigg 1987). It could therefore be suggested that in areas at risk of natural disaster people prepare by forming help groups which would be ready to provide assistance in the event of a disaster. This would then help capitalise on the immediate feelings of wanting to help which appear to be shown after a disaster. In the case of technological disaster it could be a good idea to provide information sessions for people living in risk areas or those who have been affected and advice lines and help groups set up in communities at risk or affected. This may help negate the effects found in research by Cuthbertson & Nigg, and in addition Sjoberg (1991) found that the more knowledge people had about exposure to toxins the less their perceived risk. Once a disaster or catastrophe has occurred research shows that those affected will need support for stress related problems and psychological disorders such as sleep disturbance and nightmares, (Wood 1992; Davidson & Baum 1986) therefore in known risk areas it may be advisable to train members of those communities in counselling skills in order to ensure a resource base for coping with any event. This would also be supported by a theoretical explanation of the effects of disasters, particularly stress, which argues that the extent to which people are able to conserve resources will determine the amount of stress suffered after a disaster (Hobfoll 1989) It can be seen that psychological research has contributed extensively to an understanding of the effects of disaster and catastrophe and measures which can be taken to minimise these effects. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

Summary

There is quite a lot of detail contained in this essay and the writer has used some very good references. There is quite a lot to cover under the title and the writer has managed to be concise and include all the pertinent and relevant information.

Score 4 *

Marked by teacher Linda Penn 26/07/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Discuss the use of animals in psychological research.

    3 star(s)

    Another ethical reason against the use of animals is the animal rights argument. In contrast to the Utilitarian argument, the animal rights argument says that research using animals should never be tolerated under any circumstances. The animal rights argument argues that animals have an inherent value and should not be treated as merely renewable resources.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Preventing and Reducing Crime

    3 star(s)

    A Social Psychology theory looks at whether criminality is a direct result of the individual or the social environment. For example, if an individual lives in a geographical area where there is large numbers of crime, then it could be argued that this will influence the individual into criminality as a way of making ends meet.

  1. Whistleblowing, The Problems and the Issue.

    psychologically, which includes tension between by colleagues, spreading of rumours, formal reprimands, transfer to positions with no work or too much work, demotion, dismissal and blacklisting (Martin, 1999, a). Secondly, they cannot gain trust from others. Usually, whistleblowers are hard working and conscientious employees.

  2. Identify a transition that may be experienced by a child or group of children. ...

    explains that some schools in Australia allow parents, and even grand parents to take part in a number of activities and games over a much longer period. This helps to ease the transition to school as the child is less anxious and more supported.

  1. "Anti-Social Behaviour is caused by a person's family background"

    meals, as this is how schools assess whether children are from a low-income family. There will also be a list of anti social activities where the participants will have to tick whether they have engaged in any of the activities, or witnessed any in their area.

  2. What are the main methods of investigation available to psychologists? Drawing on evidence from ...

    In some circumstances, participants may even decide to try to outwit the experimenter by giving the opposite response to their natural one, although the majority of participants tend to co-operate in order to be helpful. In a study performed by Milgram (1963, 1974), it is thought that Milgram himself inadvertently influenced participants, thereby rendering his results unreliable.

  1. Evaluation of Milgram's Obedience Study

    Smith & Bond carried out many other cross-cultural variations of Milgram's study. In 1968 they carried out the study in Italy using students, they found a higher obedience rate of 85%, however the maximum voltage was 330V, less than the voltage in Milgram's original study.

  2. Milgram Methodology and Alternative research

    them, and they could have guessed the aims of the research, knowing that the shocks weren't real, which would have flawed the effects of an authority figure.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work