• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss ethical issues involving human participants in psychology

Extracts from this document...


Discuss ethical issues involving human participants in psychology In most psychological experiments, human participants are used and sometimes this is unethical. This can range from not being allowed basic human rights (e.g. Zimbardo's experiment) to being told they are going to die e.g. an experiment in the 1960s which told people on a plane that the engine was about to fail. Milgram's experiment on obedience attracted a lot of criticism due to his treatment of the participants. It psychologically harmed many participants and this was evident from their reactions during and after the experiment, with many participants crying and harming themselves e.g. my digging their nails into their hands. Milgram claimed that this was justified because he did a follow up a year later to check that the participants were okay. However, this could be criticised because those participants who were still suffering probably wouldn't want to be associated with Milgram or the experiment anymore and so wouldn't have taken part in the follow up, thus missing their results out. ...read more.


Although the participants all consented to take part in the experiment, they were unaware of what the exact aim was and they were told that it was an experiment into learning techniques. This was an example of active deception as participants were misled about the purpose of the experiment and their role in it. Milgram argued that, if the findings had been different and it was found that the participants were not so socially obedient then there would have been little ethical issues raised. Milgram argues that all participants were given the right to withdraw. On the other hand, when participants tried to leave the experiment room or asked to stop, the experimenter encouraged them to continue, saying that the whole experiment would be ruined if they left. This was an example of verbal coercion because he was making the participants feel like they couldn't leave even though they could and it can be argued that this was also unethical. ...read more.


The findings of the experiment and their application to society must outweigh any ethical issues for participants, and it seems that both Milgram and Zimbardo weren't valid enough to reach conclusions. Psychologists have criticised Zimbardo's experiment, suggesting that it held demand characteristics and people just acted as they do in films rather than in a real-life prison. This indicates that they weren't justified. Another study that holds serious ethical issues is Humphrey's study into understudied relationships. He pretended to be a 'watchqueen' in a 'tearoom', a public toilet where homosexual men meet for sex. Humphreys made a note of the license plate numbers of the visitors to the tearoom. He then accesses the addresses of the car owners and interviewed them at home, claiming to be a health services worker. This study is unethical because, not only is it undertaken on a very sensitive issue but the participants had no idea they were in an experiment; there was lack of informed consent, deception and invasion of privacy. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level The Psychology of Individual Differences section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level The Psychology of Individual Differences essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Behavioural Study of Obedience - Stanley Milgram

    5 star(s)

    If the learner performs at chance level, then he should get one in every four answers correct. If the learner gets it right then the next question is given without any punishment. If the learner gets the answer wrong, then he is administered a shock that is 15 volts higher than the voltage of the last shock delivered.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Compare and Contrast the five main perspectives in psychology

    3 star(s)

    Here interest turns to the formation of heterosexual relationships. As a summary Freud's key theory is that the individual is shaped by early experiences. The psychodynamic approach rejects the idea that people have free will.

  1. Are transgender operations ethical

    At birth an infant will be assigned as male or female often purely from external genitalia, and it is not hard to see that this can lead to an error as there is evidence for a few abnormalities in the foetus's development that can lead to a mis-assignment.

  2. The geographical article chosen for the purpose for this assessment is an essay by ...

    However, he pointed out that this should not be taken as a complete picture of a person's personality. Everyone has unique traits and any personality profile should be accompanied by a description of these unique traits. His 16PF is widely used often accompanied by an interview.

  1. The Perils of Obedience, By Stanley Milgram

    The upper left-hand corner of the generator is labelled SHOCK GENERATOR, TYPE ZLB. DYSON INSTRUMENT COMPANY, WALTHAM, MASS. OUTPUT 15 VOLTS -- 450 VOLTS. Each subject is given a sample 45 volt shock from the generator before his run as teacher, and the jolt strengthens his belief in the authenticity of the machine.

  2. Discuss issues of bias in diagnostic systems

    However, rates of diagnosis for Afro-Caribbean?s are not as high elsewhere in the world as they are in the UK. Another alternative explanation for the high diagnosis rates in the UK may be that members of minority ethnic groups

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work