• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss how the primacy effects and recency effects AND central traits might influence impression formation. Refer to empirical evidence in your answer

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Discuss how the primacy effects and recency effects AND central traits might influence impression formation. Refer to empirical evidence in your answer (10 marks) The order of the information we receive about someone can be an important factor. There are two possibilities the first or the last. Common sense suggests we would wait until we have all the information and then make a judgement but in fact psychologists have learned not to follow common sense predictions but to conduct research instead. A primacy effect has occurred if the first piece of information presented had the greatest impact or longest influence on the impression formed about someone. A recency effect has occurred if the last piece of information presented had greatest impact or longest influence on the impression formed about someone. These effects are concerned with the order in which the information about a person is received. There is another factor which is central tendency and this is when some traits we discover about a person are more influential on the impression we form are more influential on the impression we form about that person than other traits might be. ...read more.

Middle

Jones felt that a recency effect might occur in a more realistic setting, participants watched a person solving maths problems, for every correct solution, they saw a green light switch on but when incorrect, they saw a red light. Overall there were 15 red and 15 green. The orders were: green lights at beginning then red lights and the exact reverse for group B. Participants were asked to estimate how many they got right, Group A on average participants said 21/30 and Group B said 13/30.Obviously this is evidence for a primacy effect and this is the opposite to what researchers expected. Asch in 1946 did another experiment, he pretended the following word list describing a person to participants and he asked them to rate the person on how pleasant they thought he might be (intelligent, industrial, skilful, --x --, determined, practical, and cautious. The middle words were "warm" "cold" "polite" "blunt". He found that polite and blunt had no impact on the impression formed but ratings were much more favourable for the "warm" group then the "cold" group. ...read more.

Conclusion

Both the Asch and the Luchins study show how easy impressions can be formed from limited information and it might be the case that once the impression has started to form, we ignore any later information that doesn't fit with our impression. Jones proved that first impressions really do count. Asch's second study measuring central traits was unrealistic as we rarely rate someone based on a list of words, but a real life setting study by Kelley confirmed Asch's study. Kelley provided evidence for a very strong support for the idea that some traits are central and do affect out impressions of someone. Whether traits are central or peripheral depends on the situation, if we have to decide whether someone is possible "friend" then warmth is important. But, for a salesperson we would be concerned that they acted with politeness rather than being blunt with us. This suggests that traits can be central or not depending on the situation. All the research indicates that we make snap judgements about people based on little information so we should be aware that we may misjudge people unless we wait before forming our impressions. ?? ?? ?? ?? Social Cognition ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Psychology First Impression

    The first information we receive is the most important and most likely to be remembered. Asch and Luchins used hypothetical people in their study. However, Jones et al (1968) used an actual person.Participants watched a video of a student solving a set of multiple choice questions with the frequency of

  2. An Investigation to see whether the halo effect is present when rating personality ...

    Participants were asked to rate them out of ten with the lowest being one and the highest being 10 before the scores were averaged out to give each picture a total out of 30 for each participant. A repeat measures design was used for this investigation so that fewer participants

  1. Describe and discuss social facilitation theory. Refer to empirical evidence in your answer.

    Researchers recorded the number of successful shots by six identified as average and six identified as below average. At the stage the players did not know that they were being observed. Four researchers then walked up to the tables of the players so that it was obvious that they were observing their game.

  2. Psychology Questions Ansewered

    and how we make social judgements (the sense we make of social behaviour). Using the studies from the list below, answer the questions which follow. Milgram (obedience) Tajfel (intergroup categorization) Haney, Banks and Zimbardo (prison simulation) Piliavin, Rodin and Piliavin (subway Samaritans)

  1. Relationship formation

    Walster et al (1966) tested the matching hypothesis in a dance study. In this study, 752 first-year undergraduates at the University of Minnesota were invited to attend a 'get acquainted' dance. They believe they had been 'matched' with their 'date' when in fact they were randomly assigned with partners.

  2. Focus Group Research gives the researcher access to tacit, uncodified and experiential knowledge in ...

    The main areas of disagreement are with the use of existing groups, which Krueger (1994) and Greenbaum (1998) actually refer to as 'The danger of existing groups.' 'People within these groups may have formal or informal ways of relating to each other that can influence their responses...

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work