• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss one or more theories into the maintenance of relationships

Extracts from this document...


Discuss one or more theories into the maintenance of relationships (24 marks) There are no clear boundaries between the formation & maintenance of relationships. The Rewards/Needs satisfaction theory suggests long-term relationships are formed & maintained by meeting the needs of the other person, by providing rewards. Smith & Mackie supported the view of meeting biological, emotional & social needs, all which vary depending on the relationship at different progressions. Clark however, argues that rewards aren't exchanged tit for tat within a relationship, but to provide pleasure & increase well being of the other person. Economic theories explain how relationships are maintained & why they breakdown. Homan's social exchange theory suggests people aim to maximise rewards & reduce costs within their relationships. Rewards include; being cared for, companionship & sex, costs however include; effort, financial investment & missed opportunities with others. If the rewards are greater than the costs, then the relationship is seen as profitable, however if the opposite is true the relationship is costly, meaning that the people involved are likely to be dissatisfied, which may lead to a breakdown of the relationship. ...read more.


Simpson found support for this, with people in a relationship giving alternatives a lower rating, which may have been to improve the comparison level of their current relationship. The comparison level has been criticised because it assumes people are selfish & spend time thinking about the costs & rewards of their current relationships. Duck argued people only start to consider alternative relationships when they become dissatisfied with their current relationship. The theory also doesn't account for those who leave a relationship without an alternative, which the comparison level can't explain. People stay in abusive relationships despite the costs, which Argyle argued was because they have too much invested - a more likely reason. The investment model by Rusbult suggests commitment is important in maintenance of relationship & can determine if relationship will breakdown. Commitment demonstrates the level of satisfaction within a relationship, with the model believing that commitment is a reward within the relationship, which is better than the alternatives & substantial investment. ...read more.


The longitudinal method means that participant variables are consistent, & depicts sequence & continuity of the relationships rather than just a snapshot. However the questions about costs & benefits, from the research, could be influenced by researchers biased, as the study was conducted as an interview & the experimenter could have neglected other possible explanations. Hence the theory may be "artefact of the methodology". There is also a question as to whether the Equity theory can explain maintenance of western relationships. It is less effective in collectivist non-western cultures or cultures where freedom to leave the relationship is limited by laws & social norms. The economic theories of relationships are ethnocentric & an etic analysis or attempt to apply them in other cultures would be inappropriate. This suggests that how relationships are maintained is based on the nurture of the individual, with culture being a key factor. Duck argued focusing on narrow aspects of relationships at a particular point in time, rather than a more holistic view research, has misrepresented relationships. It would be better to study relationships as processes rather than states. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Outline one theory of the maintenance of relationships. The social exchange theory (Thibaut and ...

    3 star(s)

    This process may also involve a consideration of what might be available to them from their social network (e.g. more time to spend with friends) if they were not in a steady relationship. Evaluate two theories of the maintenance of romantic relationships (16 marks)

  2. Psychology Questions Ansewered

    However some psychology seems to have no use at all. Using the studies from the list below, answer the questions which follow. Loftus and Palmer (eyewitness testimony) Deregowski (perception) Samuel and Bryant (conservation) Hraba and Grant (doll choice) What do these studies tell us that is useful?

  1. Deindividuation theories.

    Further support arises from Johnson and Downing's KKK reinterpretation as mentioned earlier. Prentice-Dunn and Rogers induced deindividuation by instructing participants repeatedly to focus attention outwards (private self-awareness).

  2. AQA A2 Psychology Unit 3 Relationships: The Formation, Maintenance And Breakdown of Romantic Relationships ...

    - Perceptions of chances of getting something better (the `comparison level for alternatives` or cla). * The formula used to calculate relationship outcome is: OUTCOME = REWARDS - COSTS Relationships progress through a number of stages: 1.

  1. Theories on the maintenance and breakdown of relationships

    have a choice but to be selfish in their relationship and that they will keep an eye on the exchange of rewards and costs. This is an issue because not everyone will be selfish in their relationship. People do have a choice of whether or not be selfish and also

  2. Discuss explanations of the maintenance of relationships

    Despite the fact that many of the main assumptions of exchange theory were supported by research, it soon became clear that, for most people, profit was less important than fairness in relationships. This resulted in a modified version of the exchange theory, namely the equity theory (Walster et al 1978).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work