• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Discuss psychological research into interpersonal attraction

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

DISCUSS PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH INTO INTERPERSONAL ATTRACTION The main explanations relating to interpersonal attraction are physical attraction, attitude similarity and proximity (frequency of interaction). Many studies have been carried out to find out what people may find attractive and why people may date someone similar to themselves in terms of physical attractiveness. Singh(1993) claims that the more curvaceous the female the more attractive she is perceived, due to a portrayal of fertility and 'child bearing hips'. Gangestad claimed that the more symmetrical the face the more attractive it is perceived to be, as people get older they become less symmetrical so this could be a sign of youthfulness. The Sociobiological theory says that for men youth and attractiveness are important in women as they are good signs or healthy reproductive potential. Ellis found that taller men are perceived as more desirable dates than shorter men in western societies however there have been many powerful leaders who have been shorter and not all cultures see height as attractive. ...read more.

Middle

Physical attraction is not just important at first, Murstein & Christy(1976) found that married couples were more similar in attractiveness than dating couples. People tend to like others who are similar to themselves on a range of factors including age, religion and attitudes. Duck & Barnes (1992) found this to be true for all ages. Evidence suggests that the critical similarities are those concerning beliefs, attitudes and values. Newcombe (1961) recruited students and gained information about their beliefs and attitudes to determine who would share rooms. Some were paired with someone with similar attitudes, some with a person with different attitudes. Friendships were more likely to develop between students who shared the same beliefs and attitudes than those who did not. Byrne et al(1961) found that attitude similarity had much more of an effect on attraction when the attitudes were of importance to the individual. Caspi & Herbener(1990) found that married couples tend to be similar on all personality dimensions. Rubin (1973) ...read more.

Conclusion

It seems that people get to like someone the more times they are exposed to them. However frequency of interaction can also produce more disliking. So it may be that it results in greater intensity of feelings which can be positive or negative. Newcombe found that students became friends with their room-mates even when there was an inconsistency in attitudes, supporting that familiarity may be more important than attitude similarity in friendships. A problem is that much research in this area has been artificial and leaves out most of the things people do in everyday life. It is impossible to control the important factors which influence relationship formation, except in highly artificial situations which lack ecological validity. Much of the research has focused on thoughts or attitudes rather than actual social interaction. There has also been a focus on a limited variety of relationships often between young students in America and so there is a danger generalizing from such a limited population. Also there has been too much emphasis on romantic relationships at the expense of other important relationships. ?? ?? ?? ?? Sarah Warbrick 20/9/04 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Social Psychology essays

  1. A Replication of the Study by Murstein Investigating the Matching Hypothesis

    "Evidence for assortative mating among humans seems well established. Human's mate assortatively regarding age, IQ, height, weight, nationality, educational and occupational level, physical and personality characters" (Alvarez et al. ,2004) It therefore seems inappropriate to reduce attributions of attractiveness to just one reward factor when many others are also important in mate selection in such a complex organism.

  2. The matching hypothesis

    The table above shows the results. For couple 3, all participants said 'Yes', couple 1 match the least according to the participants. Discussion: Aim of research: The aim of this investigation was to find out if couples are rated as having similar attractiveness, and if they are suited as a couple.

  1. The Matching Hypothesis

    I expect to find similar findings to those found by Murstein in the real couples being similar in physical attractiveness. If the ratings are similar between real couples then this would provide support for the matching hypothesis. Alternative Hypothesis There will be a statistically significant, positive correlation between the ratings of physical attractiveness for real couples.

  2. social interaction

    "Whilst frustration and aggression are related, frustration does not always lead to aggression." Gross R et al (2000:67) Aggression can be reinforced where as frustration is a natural emotion. Aggressive behaviour can be aroused by other aspects then frustration. How could this effect Ms Brown's situation.

  1. Discuss interpersonal attraction

    The huge no. of supporting studies has ensured that similarity is a factor not to be ignored. As indicated by Rubin, similarity allows us to carry out activities more comfortably as it allows others to understand what/why you are doing more easily.

  2. Assess the extent to which psychological explanations and research have established the factors in ...

    In addition, those from individualist cultures rated such people as being assertive and strong, and those from collectivist cultures rated them as being sensitive and generous (Markus et al., 1997). This is an indication of how the halo effect exists across cultures, but can differ in its interpretations.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work